Develop sustainable coffee-based farming model using cash crops production

Paper Details

Research Paper 15/01/2026
Views (199)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Develop sustainable coffee-based farming model using cash crops production

Maribel L. Fernandez, Roje Marie C. Rosqueta*, Diosa G. Alasaas, Boyet C. Pattung, Jaylord Dalapo, Janette Empleo
Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 134-142, January 2026.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2026; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was conducted February 2022 to March 9, 2023, to determine effects of levels of vermicompost on peanut intercropped in coffee plants. The study aimed to determine the best treatment using the following parameters: growth, yield performance, and Cost and Return Analysis (ROI). The different treatment in the study was: T1- Farmers Practice, T2- RR+700kg of vermicompost/ha, T3- RR+750kg of vermicompost/ha, T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha. and layout in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). Significant results were shown 30 days after planting (DAP) on the height of peanut plants. The number of peanut root nodules at 20, 40 and 60 DAP, T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained highest mean of 25.80 cm, 36.58 cm, and 53.65 cm respectively. While T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained highest number of leaves, and T1- Farmers Practice obtained lowest. The to weight of pods, developed pods, and number of seeds per pod shows that T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained the highest mean. T1- Farmers Practice obtained the lowest number of undeveloped pods with a mean of 10.15g.  Moreover, T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha remained the highest yield/ha with a mean of 1,543 kilograms. The application of T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained the highest ROI gaining 259.13%. The study revealed that NSIC Pn 09 applied with different levels of vermicompost as organic fertilizer influenced the plant height, root nodules, leaves, developed and undeveloped pods, seed number and pod weight. While, T4- RR+800kg of vermicompost/ha obtained highest plant height, root nodules, leaves, developed pods, seeds per pod, yield/ ha and ROI.

Abdzad G, Noorhosseini A, Niyaki SA. 2010. Effects of iron and nitrogen fertilizers on yield and yield components of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Astaneh Ashrafiyeh, Iran. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science 9(3), 256 – 262.

Adinya IB, enun EE, Ijoma JU. 2010. Exploring profitability potentials groundnut production through agroforestry practices a case study in Nigeria. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 20(2), 123 – 131.

Alcantara EN. de, Nobrega JCA, Ferreira MM. 2009. Methods of weed control in coffee affect soil chemical properties. Ciência Rural 39(3), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009000300017

Ali AAG, Mowafy SAE. 2003. Effect of different levels of potassium and phosphorus fertilizers with the foliar application of zinc and boron on peanut in sandy soils. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 335-358.

Arya SS, Chauhan S, Salve A. 2016. Peanuts as functional food: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 53(1), 31–41.

Espíndola JAA, Guerra JGM, Almeida DL de, Teixeira MG, Urquiaga S. 2006. Decomposition and nutrient accumulation in perennial herbaceous legumes intercropped with banana. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa 30(2), 321-328.

Favero C, Da, Jucksch I, Alvarenga RC, Costa LM da. 2001. Changes in the population of weeds in the presence of green manures. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília 36(11), 1355-1362.

Habtamu Deribe. 2018. Review on Effect of weed on coffee quality yield and its control measures in Southwestern Ethiopia International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences 2018, 4(10), 7-16.

Masa, Maria Rasa. 2023. Coffee farming in the Philippines.

Pacheco LP, Pires FR, Monteiro FP, Procópio S. de O, Assis RL. De, Carmo ML. do, Petter FA. 2008. Performance of cover crops in overseeded in soybean crop. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 43(7), 815-823.

Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V. 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: A critical review. Plant Growth Regulation 41, 75–88.

Tarawali A, Quee D. 2014. Performance of groundnut varieties in two agroecologies in Sierra Leone. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9(19), 1442 1448.

Taru VB, Khagya IZ, Mshelia SI, Adebayo EF. 2008. Economic Efficiency of resource use in groundnut production in Adamawa State of Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Science 56, 4896-900.

Taru VB, Kyagya IZ, Mshelia SI. 2010. Profitability of groundnut Production in Michika Local Government Area of Adamawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science 1(1), 25–29.

Vara Prasad PV, Vijaya Gopal K, Hari DU. 2009. Growth and production of groundnut, in Soils, Plant Growth and Crop Production. In: Encyclopedia of Life               Support Systems. (Ed. Willy H. V.), United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization, Eolss. 11- 27p.

Weiss A, Van Crowder LM, Bernardi M. 2000. Communicating     agrometeorological information to farming communities. Agricultural Forest Meteorology 103, 185–196.

Yakubu H, Kwari JD, Tekwa JA. 2010. Nodulation and N2- fixation grain legumes as affected by Boron Fertilizers in Sudano – Sahelian Zone of Northeastern Nigeria. American Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science 8(5), 514–519.

Related Articles

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.

Valorisation of table waste and fruit waste by black soldiers (Ullicens hermetica)

Ayaba Adéline Hounnou, Vanessa Chabi, Jomini Marc Sène Alitonou, Franck Sokenou, Mickael Vitus Martin Kpessou Saïzonou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo, Guy Alain Alitonou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 123-128, April 2026.

Murraya koenigii (Linn.) Spreng.: An opulent source of fatty acid

Shahin Aziz*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 116-122, April 2026.

Design and architecture of an IoT-enabled bamboo resource management system: Data-driven approach for sustainable agriculture

Charlot L. Maramag*, Dorothy M. Ayuyang, Richard R. Ayuyang, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 107-115, April 2026.

Physicochemical and microbiological characterization of flours from the local variety of purple corn (Zea mays L.) produced and marketed in Katiola (Côte d’Ivoire)

Moumouny Traore*, N´Zebo Desiré Kouame, Pepiesin Marie Ange Melem Soro, Zamblé Bi Irié Abel Boli, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 98-106, April 2026.

In the shadows of governance: Exploring youth participation in local peacebuilding initiatives

Juramie R. Rubia, Benny R. Rubia, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 85-97, April 2026.

Evaluation of the agronomic performance, beta-carotene content and dry matter content of 228 sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) genotypes in Burkina Faso

Nattan Gamsore*, Koussao Some, Djakaridja Tiama, Pauline Bationo_Kando, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 73-84, April 2026.

Geomatics tools for agricultural and farm disaster risk management and reduction: A survey of farmers in South-South coastal communities, Nigeria

G. O. Nwodo, O. J. Ugwu, E. U. Onah, A. Ugwuoti, E. Elijah Ebinne*, O. P. Nogheghase, S. I. Ogbaa, U. E. Ahuchaogu, T. O. Ogbuji, C. P. Owuamalam-Chidi, C. O. Osuagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, O. E. Mbakaogu, J. U. Chikaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 59-72, April 2026.