Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | May 1, 2016

| Download 1

Development of a simple and efficient protocol for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) transformation by floral injection method

Syed Hassan Shahid, Mahmood ul Hassan, Irfan Iqbal, Noreen Fatima, Tayyuba Kousar, Zahid Ikram, Shaukat Ali

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.8(5), 50-59, May 2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/8.5.50-59


IJB 2016 [Generate Certificate]


Agrobacterium-mediated transformation has been widely used in various crops for development of varieties better in quality and adaptation against biotic and abiotic stresses. Chickpea plant shows limitation towards in vitro regeneration during course of transgenic plant development therefore it is the need of hour to develop a protocol independent of pre-culture, co-cultivation and regeneration steps. Therefore, in the present study a modification has been done in floral dip method of transformation in chickpea to examine the effect of genotypes, optical density of bacterial culture and floral bud stage. Six varieties (Parbat, Punjab-2008, Dasht, CM-2008, NCS-0709 and Noor-2009) were grown. Overnight culture of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harboring binary vector pCAMBIA1301 containing GUS gene was injected into the floral buds at two different stages. Transformed seeds were harvested at plant maturity and plants were subjected to GUS assay. Effect of genotypes, culture concentrations and floral bud stages on transformation efficiency was calculated. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s Multiple Range Test (TMRT) were applied to data by using MSTAT-C software. Among all of the genotypes studied; DASHT genotype at hooded floral bud stage with Agrobacterium cell density of 0.5 OD600 has exhibited the highest transformation efficiency percentage.This method of plant transformation is more economical and feasible in chickpea because it doesnot involve regeneration stages.


Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Development of a simple and efficient protocol for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) transformation by floral injection method

Akbulut M, Yücel M, Öktem HA. 2008. Analysis and optimization of DNA delivery into chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seedlings by Agrobacterium tumefacience. African Journal of Biotechnology 7, 1011-1017. Anon. 1994. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Organization. Rome, Italy.

Aslam M, Mahmood IA, Mehmood T, Sultan T, Ahmad S. 2000. Inoculation approach to legume crops and their production assessment in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 3, 193-195.

Basavanna. 2003. In planta and in vitro transformation studies in pigeonpea (CajanuscajanL. Millsp.). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.

Clough SJ, Bent AF. 1998. Floral dip a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal 16, 735–743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x

Ellis RH, Covell S, Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ.  1986.  The  influence  of  temperature  on  seed germination rate in grain legumes II. Intraspecific variation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at constant temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 1503-1515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/37.10.1503

Dobhal S, Pandey D, Kumar A, Agrawal S. 2010. Studies on plant regeneration and transformation efficiency of Agrobacterium mediated transformation using neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) and glucuronidase (GUS) as a reporter gene. African Journal of Biotechnology 9, 6853-6859.

Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12, 13‐15.

Eshel Y. 1968. Flower development and pollen viability of chickpea (Cicerarietinum L ). Israel Journal of Agricultural Research, 3 1 – 3 3.

Feldmann KA, Marks MD. 1987. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of germinating seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana a non-tissue culture approach. Molecular and General Genetics 208, 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00330414

Gu XF, Meng H, Qi G, Zhang JR. 2008. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the winter jujube (Zizyphus jujube Mill.).Plant Cell Tissue and Organ culture 94, 23-32.

Gunes A, Inal A, Adak MS, Alpaslan M. 2007. Mineral nutrition of wheat, chickpea and lentil as affected by mixed cropping and soil moisture. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 78, 83-96.

HassanG, Khan N, Khan H. 2003. Effect of zero tillage and herbicides on the weed density and yield of chickpea under rice-based conditions of D.I. Khan [Pakistan]. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research (Pakistan) 9, 193-200.

Jefferson RA. 1987. Assaying chimeric genes in plants, the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 5, 387–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02667740

Joyce P, Kuwahata M, Turner N, Lakshmanan P. 2010. Selection system and co-cultivation medium are important determinants of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane. Plant Cell Reports 29, 173-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-009-0810-3

Kahrizi D, Hatef SA, Zebarjadi AR. 2007. Effect of plant genotype, explant and Agrobacterium strain on transformation efficiency in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Modern Genetics Journal 2, 53-62.

Kaiser WJ, Hannan RM. 1985. Effect of planting date and fungicide seed treatment onthe emergence and yield of kabuli and desi chickpeas in eastern Washington state. International Chickpea Newsletter 12, 16-18.

Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR. 1986. Somaclonal variation- a novel source of variability from cell cultures to plant improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 60, 197-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02342540

Lee KW, Choi GJ, Kim KY, Yoon SH, Ji HC, Park HS, Lim YC, Lee SH. 2010. Genotypic variation of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Italian ryegrass. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 13, 8-9.

Martinez-Trujillo M, Limones-Briones V, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Herrera-Estrella L. 2004. Improving transformation efficiency ofArabidopsis thaliana by modifying the floral dip method. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 22, 63-70.

Reddy SY. 2007. In Planta transformation studies in chick pea (Cicerarietinum L.).(Unpublished) M.Sc. thesis, University of India 65 p.

Saxena MC. 1984. Agronomic studies on winter chickpeas. Pages 88 – 96 in Proceedings of the International Work shop on Chickpea Improvement. 28 Feb – 2 Mar 1979, ICRISAT Center, India. Patancheru, A.P. 502 324, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi –Arid Tropics.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey D. 1997.Principles and Procedure of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach 3rd Ed. McGrawHill Book Co. Inc., New York. 352-358.

Yenchon S, Te-chato S. 2012. Effect of bacteria density, inoculation and co-cultivation period on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of oil palm embryogenic callus. Journal of Agricultural Technology 8, 1485-1496.

Thomas M, Vyas SC. 1984. Nodulation and yield of chickpea treated with fungicides atsowing. International Chickpea Newsletter, 37-38.

Yang M, Xie X, Zheng C, Zhang F, He X, Li Z. 2008. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of Acacia crassicarpa via organogenesis. Plant cell, tissue and organ culture 95, 141-147.

Zia M, Arshad W, Bibi Y, Nisa S, Chaudhary MF. 2011. Does Agro-injection to soybean pods transform embryos?. Plant Omics 4, 384-390.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background