Development strategy of social forestry by the forest village community institution in the kayutangi forest management unit

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2018
Views (891)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Development strategy of social forestry by the forest village community institution in the kayutangi forest management unit

Novia Novariani, Hamdani Fauzi, Basir
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 13(1), 93-101, July 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Social forestry is the answer to poverty alleviation and also to mitigate climate change. Through the HKm (community forest), Village Forest, HTR (community forest plantation) and Partnership schemes, so we will get the implication and the community will gain economic benefits by proposing surrounded forest area to become a Social Forestry area in Rantau Bujur Village and Pakutik Village. The purpose of this research is to describe the implementation of social forestry, identify the role of forest village community institutions in social forestry, and also formulate a strategy of social forestry development in the kayutangi forest management unit. The method that has been used in this study is likert scale, qualitative descriptive analysis and SWOT analysis. This study had an identification of village communities by using 28 respondents and 4 key informants. Implementation of LMDH (Forest Village Community Organization) Asuhan murni is 77.14% and LMDH (Forest Village Community Organization) Sinar baru is only 56.42% because of the lack of information on social forestry and the lack of counseling from the Office/KPH to the community, and also the lack of community experience in organization. .The strategy that was chosen in the Rantau Bujur Village is Strength-Opportunities/SO (Strength-opportunities), which the strengths that we have can be used optimally, while in the Pakutik Village used Weakness-Opportunities /WO (Strength-opportunities), to maximize the opportunity factors to reduce weakness. This study produced each of three social forestry development strategies.

Awang, S. 2010. Politik Kehutanan Masyarakat. Kreasi Wacana, Yogyakarta.

Bappeda Kalsel. 2006. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Tahun 2005-2025. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarmasin.

BPDAS Barito. 2009. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Gerakan Rehabilitasi Hutan dan Lahan di Kalimantan Selatan. Balai Pengelolaan DAS Barito, Banjarbaru.

Fauzi H. 2010. Pembangunan Hutan Berbasis Kehutanan Sosial. Karya Putra Darwati, Bandung https://www.pengertianmenurutparaahli.net (Diakses 6 Juni 2017).

Fauzi, H. 2010. Kehutanan masyarakat (1st ed., p. 274). Pustaka Banua. Banjarmasin.

Mardikanto et al. 1996. Penyuluhan Pembangunan Kehutanan. Pusat Penyuluhan Kehutanan Departemen Kehutanan RI dan Fakultas Pertanian UNS. Jakarta.

Rangkuti F. 2005. Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis Reorientasi Konsep Perencanaan Strategis untuk Menghadapi Abad 21. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Saputra, Mulyana A. 2010. Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat Studi Modal Sosial dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Desa Karang Tengah Kecamatan Madang Kabupaten Bogor.Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta  Sukardayati, (2006). Strategi Perhutanan Sosial.

Related Articles

Effects of ethanolic extract of Raphia hookeri fruits on chilled ram semen characteristics

Pamboundom Alassa*, Augustave Kenfack , Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 29(2), 1-15, August 2026.

Effect of different cutting ages of Jali (Coix lacryma-jobi L.) on dry matter production, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and lignin contents

Oktavia Desi Nirga, Markus Miten Kleden*, Tara Tiba Nikolaus, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 29(1), 21-28, July 2026.

The role of vegetal cover in soil erosion control in Esan West Local Government Area, Edo State, Nigeria

A. E. Ilenre*, Y. H. Tashok, S. Ayo-Odifiri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 29(1), 10-20, July 2026.

Characterization of the production systems and local initiatives for the conservation of traditional seeds of neglected crops: The case of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) in Boulkiemdé Province

Samuel Fogné Drabo*, Félix Yameogo, Rahim Romba, Sidnomwendé Rebecca Ouedraogo, Salifou Ouedraogo, Olivier Gnankine, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(6), 39-47, June 2026.

Main actors, marketing channels, harvesting practices, and constraints in the Penja white pepper value chain, Cameroon

Louis Njie Ndumbe*, Audrey Pascale Ndokon, Maximillian Njie Mojemba, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(6), 28-38, June 2026.

Characterisation of Trichoderma spp. and rhizobacteria strains isolated from the rhizosphere of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) in the Menoua Division, Western Cameroon

Francine Tchinda Nindie*, Asafor Henry Chotangui, Kouam Idriss Djoko Frank, Mvondo Awono Jean Pierre, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(6), 19-27, June 2026.

Larval development of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens Linnaues, 1758) on organophosphate-treated cabbage

Septer C. Sucdad*, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(6), 9-18, June 2026.