Diversified sericulture products: Mulberry fruit wine and wine vinegar
Paper Details
Diversified sericulture products: Mulberry fruit wine and wine vinegar
Abstract
This study explored the production of diversified sericulture products, wine and wine vinegar utilizing mulberry fruits that were analyzed and evaluated. The mulberry fruit wine had sweet, alcohol-like odor while the mulberry wine vinegar had light pungent odor and both possessed dark purple color. The wine’s chemical properties – pH, total acidity, volatile acids, ethanol and methanol were within the Philippine standards so with wine vinegar that included pH, total acidity and ash content except for the total solids attributed to the accumulated impurities which could be corrected through filtration. Sensory evaluation of the wine was described as “Good” in terms of appearance, aftertaste, aroma & bouquet, taste and texture while the wine vinegar was generally “Liked” in terms of appearance, color, texture, flavor, taste and acceptance. It implied that mulberry fruit wine and wine vinegar are potential and viable sericulture diversified products which can be adopted as source of additional income for sericulture farmers along with cocoon production and in sustaining and accelerating the development of sericulture industry.
Acharya SK, Pradhan K, Choudhuri P, Sharangi AB. 2015. Introduction. In: Sharangi A., Datta S. (eds) Value Addition of Horticultural Crops: Recent Trends and Future Directions. Springer, New Delhi.
Albert Mas, María Jesús Torija, María del Carmen García-Parrilla, Ana María Troncoso. 2014. Acetic Acid Bacteria and the Production and Quality of Wine Vinegar, The Scientific World Journal vol. 2014, Article ID 394671, 6 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/394671.
Buhroo ZI, Bhat MA, Malik MA, Kamili AS, Ganai NA, Khan IL. 2018. Trends in Development and Utilization of Sericulture Resources for Diversification and Value Addition. International Journal of Entomological Research 6(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.33687/entomol.006.01.2069.
Chuanguang Qin, Yang Li, Weining Niu. 2009. Analysis and Characterisation of Anthocyanins in Mulberry Fruit. Czech Journal of Food Sciences 28(2). DOI: 10.17221/228/2008-CJFS.
Dias DR, Duarte RF, Schwan RF. 2017. Methods of Evaluation of Fruit Wines. Science and Technology of Fruit Wine Production. M. Kosseva, V.K. Joshi, and P.S. Panesar (Eds.) Academic Press, Elsevier Inc. ISBN:978-0-12-800850-8.
Fang Lian, Fang Zhuorong, Teng Zhaowen, Yang Li. 2015. Mulberry Fruit Vinegar and Its Preparation Method. Patent No. CN 103981078A, Nov. 11, 2015.
Fiscal, Rainer and Chave, Aimee Concepcion Carino. 2016. Wine Potential of Different Philippine Fruits. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 5(10), 1049-105. DOI: 10.21275/ ART2016.
Food and Drug Administration. 2010. PNS/FDA 30:2010 – Tropical Fruit Wines – Specification.
Food and Drug Administration. 2013. Annex J, Summary of Current Food Standards as of April 04, 2013 and Minimum Requirement for Analysis of Finished Product.
Hoq MS, Raha SK, Sultana N. 2012. Value Addition in Vegetables Production, Processing and Export from Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research. 2012/10 Vol. 37; Iss.3.
Kosseva MR, Joshi VK, Panesar PS. (Eds.) 2017. Science and Technology of Fruit Wine Production. Elsevier Inc pp. 33-38.
Koyuncu F. 2004. Organic Acid Composition of Native Black Mulberry Fruit. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 40. 367-369. 10.1023/B:CONC.00000 48249.44206.e2.
Kraft Jack (ed) nd. 2017. Wine Chart-American Wine Society AWS Wine Evaluation Chart. Retrieved from https://americanwinesociety.org/wine-chart/ on December 28.
Liang L. 2012. “Chemical composition, nutritional value, and antioxidant activities of eight mulberry cultivars from China”, Pharmacognosy Magazine 8(31), 215-24.
Liu Xueming. 2006. Study on the Comprehensive Development and Industrialization Technology of Mulberry. Proceedings on International Wprkshop on Silk Handcrafts Cottage Industries and Silk Enterprises Development in Africa, Europe, Central Asia and the Near East, pp. 533-539. Bursa, Turkey.
Starcher, Sharon. 2016. Sustainability Strategies for Value-Added Agricultural Producers in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Ph. D Thesis, 167 pp. Walden University, USA.
Suman Vikas bhat, Rehana Akhtar, Tawheed Amin. 2014. An Overview on the Biological Production of Vinegar. International Journal of Fermented Foods: V.3.n.2 pp.139-155.
Tanase DB, Constatinescu M, Ichim M, Petkov N, Petkov Z. 2006. Mulberry Fruits for Food Industry. Proceedings on International Workshop on Silk Handcrafts Cottage Industries and Silk Enterprises Development in Africa, Europe, Central Asia and the Near East pp. 540-545. Bursa, Turkey.
Velić D, Daniela Amidžić Klarić, Natalija Velić, Ilija Klarić, Vlatka Petravić Tominac, Ana Mornar. 2016. Chemical Constituents of Fruit Wines as Descriptors of their Nutritional, Sensorial and Health-Related Properties. Descriptive Food Science, Chemical Constituents of Fruit Wines as Descriptors of their Nutritional, Sensorial and Health-Related Properties. Valero Díaz, Antonio, María García-Gimeno, Rosa. DOI: 10.5772/ intechopen.78796.
Velić D, Klarić DA, Velić N, Klarić I, Tominac V, Mornar A. 2018. Chemical Constituents of Fruit Wines as Descriptors of their Nutritional, Sensorial and Health-Related Properties. In A. V. Díaz, & R. M. García-Gimeno (Eds.), Descriptive Food Science. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78796.
Velic D, Velic N, Amidzic Klaric. 2018. The production of fruit wines – a review. Croatian Journal of Food Science and Technology, DOI:CJFST.2018.10.2.19.
Elizabeth P. Obra, Lilia A. Ancheta, Merlita A. Dacayanan, Crestilyn N. Damasco, 2022. Diversified sericulture products: Mulberry fruit wine and wine vinegar. J. Biodiv. Environ. Sci., 20(4), 65-71.
Copyright © 2022 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.