Diversity and distribution of anuran in two islands of Parnaíba River Delta, Northeastern Brazil

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2016
Views (281) Download (16)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Diversity and distribution of anuran in two islands of Parnaíba River Delta, Northeastern Brazil

Etielle Barroso de Andrade, José Roberto Souza Almeida Leite, Gilda Vasconcelos de Andrade
J. Bio. Env. Sci.8( 2), 74-86, February 2016.
Certificate: JBES 2016 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The distribution and composition of communities are influenced by factors that determine the environmental characteristics in a particular region. In order to obtain more information regarding the fauna of frogs in the region of the Parnaíba River Delta, Northeastern Brazil, we performed a quantitative ecological study to compare the composition and distribution of the amphibian communities. The study was conducted in the two largest islands of Deltafrom September 2008 to August 2009. Fifteen ponds were selected and slowly covered in search of males in calling activity. We recorded 21 frog species, distributed in five families and 11 genera. Ilha Grande de Santa Isabel(21 spp.) had higher species richness than the Ilha das Canárias (11 spp.). Although most species are considered to be common in open areas, they were highly influenced by the structural complexity of the vegetation. The highest richness was observed in environments with greatest availability of microhabitats for reproduction. The preservation of different environments found in the two islands, associated with the maintenance of suitable habitats for reproduction of each species, will contribute to the conservation of amphibian communities of the Parnaiba Delta River.

VIEWS 7

Afonso LG, Eterovick PC. 2007. Microhabitat choice and differential use by anurans in forest streams in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History 41, 937-948.

Andrade EB, Leite JRSA, Andrade GV. 2014. Anurans from the municipality of Ilha Grande, Parnaíba River Delta, Piauí, northeastern Brazil. Herpetology Notes 7, 219-226.

Ayres M, Ayres Jr M, Ayres DL, Santos AS. 2007. BioEstat 5.0: Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém: Sociedade Civil Mamirauá/Brasília: CNPq/Conservation International.

Bastazini CV, Munduruca JFV, Rocha PLB, Napoli MF. 2007. Which environmental variables better explain changes in anuran community composition? A case study in the Restinga of Mata de São João, Bahia, Brazil. Herpetology 63, 459–471.

Bernarde PS, Kokubum MNC. 1999. Anurofauna do Município de Guararapes, estado de São Paulo, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Acta Biologica Leopoldensia 21, 89-97.

Bernarde PS, Machado RA. 2001. Riqueza de espécies, ambientes de reprodução e temporada de vocalização da anurofauna em Três Barras do Paraná, Brasil (Amphibia: Anura). Cuadernos de Herpetología 14, 93-104.

Bertoluci J, Rodrigues JT. 2002. Seasonal patterns of breeding activity of Atlantic Rainforest anurans at Boracéia, Southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 23, 161-167.

Burkett DW, Thompson BC. 1994. Wildlife association with human-altered water sources in semiarid vegetation communities. Conservation Biology 8, 682-690.

CEPRO. 1996. Macrozoneamento Costeiro do Estado do Piauí: Relatório ambiental e sócio-econômico. Teresina.

Chase JM, Leibold MA. 2002. Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship. Nature 416, 427–430.

Colwell RK, Coddington JA. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society(Series B) 345, 101-118.

Connell JH. 1978. Diversity in tropical rainforest and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302-1310.

Conte CE, Rossa-Feres DC. 2006. Diversidade e ocorrência temporal da anurofauna (Amphibian, Anura) em São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23, 162-175.

Crouch WB, Paton PWC. 2002. Assessing the use of call surveys to monitor breeding anurans in Rhode Island. Journal of Herpetology 36, 185-192.

Crump ML. 1971. Quantitative analysis of the ecological distribution of a tropical herpetofauna. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History University of Kansas 3, 1-62.

Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1994. Biology of amphibians. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

Eterovick PC, Fernandes GW. 2001. Why do breeding frogs colonize some puddles more than others? Phyllomedusa 1, 31–40.

Eterovick PC, Sazima I. 2000. Structure of an anuran community in a montane meadow in southeastern Brazil: effects of seasonality, habitat, and predation. Amphibia-Reptilia 21, 439-461.

Fisher BL, Robertson H. 2002. Comparison and origin of forest and grassland ant assemblages in the high plateau of Madagascar. Biotropica 34, 155-167.

Frost DR. 2015. Amphibian Species of the World: an online  reference. Version  6.0.  Available  at: New York: American Museum of Natural History. Last accessed: 01 December 2015. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/ind ex.html

Fu C, Hua X, Li J, Chang Z, Pu Z, Chen J. 2006. Elevational patterns of frog species richness and endemic richness in the Hengduan Mountains, China: geometric constraints, area and climate effects. Ecography 29, 919-927.

Giaretta AA, Menin M, Facure KG, Kokubum MNC, Filho JCO. 2008. Species richness, relative abundance, and habitat of reproduction of terrestrial frogs in the TriânguloMineiro region, Cerrado biome, southeastern Brazil. Iheringia, SérieZoológica 98, 181-188.

Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience 55, 207–217.

Hammer D, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analisys. Paleontology Electron 4, 1-9.

Heyer WR, Donnelly MA,McDdiarmid RW, Hayek LC, Foster MS. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.

IBAMA. 1998. Proteção e controle de ecossistemas costeiros: manguezais da Baía de Babitonga/Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis. Coleção meio ambiente. Série estudos – pesca, 25. Brasília. 145 p.

Kopp K, Eterovick PC. 2006. Factors influencing spatial and temporal structure of frog assemblages at ponds in Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History 40, 1813-1830.

Krebs  CJ.  2000.  Ecological  Methodology.  2  ed. Harper and Row Publishers, New York.

Leite Jr. JMA, Sampaio JMS, Silva-Leite RR, Leite JRSA. 2008a.Leptodactylus natalensis(Lutz, 1930) (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae): First record from Maranhão state and new geographic distribution map. Biotemas 21, 153-156.

Leite Jr. JMA, Sampaio JMS, Silva-Leite RR, Toledo LF, Loebmann D, Leite JRSA. 2008b. Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae, Scinax fuscomarginatus: Distribution extension.Check List 4, 475–477.

Loebmann D, Mai ACG. 2008. Amphibia, Anura, Coastal Zone, state of Piauí, Northeastern Brazil. Check List 4, 161–170.

Manly BFG. 1994. A Primer of Multivariate Statistics. London, Chapman & Hall. 179 p.

McAleece N, Lambshead J, Paterson G, Gage J. 1997. Biodiversity Pro. Versão 2 (software). The Natural History Museum and the Scottish Association for Marine Science. Scotia, United Kingdom. Available at: Last acessed: 01 December 2015. http://www.nrmc.demon.co.uk/bdpro/

McCarthy MA, Lindenmayer DB. 2000. Spatially correlated extinction in a metapopulation model of Lead beater’s possum. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 47-63.

McCarthy MA. 1997. Competition and dispersal from multiple nests. Ecology78, 873-883.

MMA/SDS. 2002. Zoneamento Ecológico-Econômico do Baixo Rio Parnaíba: Subsídios técnicos, Relatório Final. – Brasília.

Nascimento LB, Miranda ACL, Balstaedt TAM. 1994. Distribuição estacional e ocupação ambiental dos anfíbios anuros da área de proteção da captação da Mutuca (Nova Lima, MG). Bios 2, 5-12.

Pounds JA, Fogden MPL, Campbell JH. 1999. Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398, 611-615.

Ricklefs RE. 2003. A economia da natureza. Rio de Janeiro, Guanabara Koogan, XXIII+503p.

Romesburg HC. 1984. Cluster Analysis for researchers. Malabar, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company. 334 p.

Santos TG, Rossa-Feres D, Casatti L. 2007. Diversidade e distribuição espaço-temporal de anuros em regiões com pronunciada estação seca no sudeste do Brasil. Ilheringa, Série Zoológica 97, 37-49.

Santos TG, Kopp K, Spies MR, Trevisan R, Cechin SZ. 2008. Distribuição temporal e espacial de anuros em área de Pampa, Santa Maria, RS. Iheringia, Iheringia, Série Zoológica 98, 244-253.

Silva GR, Santos CL, Alves MR, Sousa SDV, Annunziata BB. 2007. Anfíbios das Dunas Litorâneas do Extremo Norte do Estado do Piauí, Brasil. Sitientibus, Série Ciências Biológicas 7, 334-340.

Vasconcelos TS, Rossa-Feres DC. 2005. Diversidade, distribuição espacial e temporal de anfíbios anuros (Amphibia, Anura) na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 5, 1-14.

Vieira WLS, Santana GG, Arzabe C. 2009. Diversity of reproductive modes in anurans communities in the Caatinga (dryland) of northeastern Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 18, 55–66.

Wang Y, Li Y, Wu Z, Murray BR. 2009. Insular shifts and trade-offs in life-history traits in pond frogs in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China.Journal of Zoolology 278, 65–73.

Werner EE, Glennemeier KS. 1999. Influence of forest canopy cover on the breeding pond distributions of several amphibian species. Copeia 1999, 1-12.

Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.