Drought stress response in caucasian hackberry: growth and morphology
Paper Details
Drought stress response in caucasian hackberry: growth and morphology
Abstract
In order to evaluate the effect of drought stress on Celtis caucasica Willd seedlings, the research was conducted based on completely randomized design on summer season. On the watering regimes (2th and 4th day after drought), the morphological-related parameters were measured. Traits were measured including: height, diameter, leaf number, leaf area, shoot and root length, freshly and number of root, fresh and dry weight of roots, stem and leaf and ratios of root to shoot, leaf to shoot, leaf area, specific leaf area and leaf weight. Results indicated those terms of height seedling after fortieth day significant at the 5% level and 1% level at the end of growth period under the drought conditions. Average height, number of leaves, leaf area in the second and third months, shoot dry weight, shoot length and leaf area ratio in the drought treatment showed a of 5% significant and the number of leaves was significant at thirtieth and fortieth day by stress condition. Since the fiftieth day to the end of summer this term indicated significantly at 1% probability level. The result of repeated measures analysis showed no significant difference in height between the control treatment and drought stress, but the diameter, number of leaves and leaf area of significantly indicated at the 5% level. Principal component analysis showed that in first axis in drought stress reduced leaf area ratio and specific leaf area and second axis total dry weight increase and leaf to shoot ratio decrease were the most important traits.
Abdalla MM, El-Khoshiban NH. 2007. The influence of water stress on growth, relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, some metabolic and hormonal contents of two Triticium aestivum cultivars. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3, 2062-2074.
Bagheri V, Shamshiri MH, Shirani H, Rusta HR. 2011. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress on growth, water relations, proline accumulation and soluble plant two basic varieties of domesticated pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 42(4), 365-377.
Bibi A, Sadaqat HA, Tahir MHN, Akram HM. 2012. Screening of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Var Moench) for drought tolerance at seedling stage in polyethylene glycol. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 22(3), 671-678
Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment, Science, 218, 443-448.
Chiatante D, Di-Iorio A, Sciandra S, Stefania G, Mazzoleni S. 2006. Effect of drought and fire on root development in Quercus pubescens wild and Fraxinus ornal seedlings. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 56, 190-197.
Coopman RE, Jara JC, Bravo LA, Sáez KL, Mella GR, Escobar R. 2008. Changes in morpho-physiological attributes of Eucalyptus globulus plants in response to different drought hardening treatments. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 11(2), 1-10.
Craufurd PQ, Wheeler TR, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Williams JH. 1999. Effect of temperature and water deficit on water-use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination, and specific leaf area in peanut. Crop Sci. 39, 136–42.
Deeba F, Pandey AK, Ranjan S, Mishra A, Singh R, Sharma YK, Shirke PA, Pandey V. 2012. Physiological and proteomic responses of cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.) to drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 53, 6-18.
El Atta HA, Aref I, Ismail Ahmed A, Rasheed Khan P. 2012. Morphological and anatomical response of Acacia ehrenbergiana Hayne and Acacia tortilis (Forssk) Haynes subsp. Raddiana seedlings to induced water stress. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(44), 10188-10199.
Emiliano Quiroga R, Ferna´ndez RJ, Golluscio RA, Blanco LJ. 2013. Differential water-use strategies and drought resistance in Trichloris crinita plants from contrasting aridity origins, Plant Ecology, 214, 1027–035.
Farhoodi R, Safahany Langroodi AR. 2011. Environmental stress physiology in plants. Shushtar University Press, first edition, 155 pages.
Gindaba J, Rozanov A, Negash L. 2004. Response of seedlings of two Eucalyptus and three deciduous tree species from Ethiopia to severe water stress. Forest Ecology and Management, 201, 119-129.
Hugh JE, Davis F. 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation efficiency and yield of maize. Agro. J. 95, 688–696.
Jalili Marandi R. 2010. Environmental stress physiology and mechanisms of resistance in horticultural plants. Urumie, Jahad University Press, 636 pages.
Javadi T, Bahramnejad B. 2010. Relative water content and gas exchange of wild pear genotypes under stress conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science, (Agricultural Sciences and Technology), 24(2), 223-233.
Jensen CR, Mogensen VO, Mortensen G, Andersen MN, Schjoerring JK, Thage JH, Koribidis J. 1996. Leaf photosynthesis and drought adaptation in field-grown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23, 631–644.
Karimi M, Azizi M. 1994. Analysis of crop growth. Jahad Mashhad University Press, 111 pages.
Koochaki A. 1988. Aspects of drought resistance in sorghum grain. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology. 2(2), 54-48.
Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG. 1982. Water supply and tree growth, Part I. Water deficits. Forest. Abstr. 43, 57-95.
Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG. 1997. Physiology of woody plants. Ed. 2. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Lemcoff JH, Garau A, Guarnaschelli A, Prystupa P. 1997. Water stress in seedlings of Eucalyptus camaldulensis clones and its effects on growth characteristics. In: IUFRO Conference on Silviculture and Improvement of Eucalypt. Proceedings. Colombo: EMBRAPA-Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Florestas.
Lerner BL, Dona MN. 2005. Growing Sweet Corn. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service.
Levitt J. 1980. Stress terminology. In: N. C. Turner and P. J. Kramer. (eds.). Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. Willey, New York. 437-439 pages.
Liu F, Stützel H. 2004. Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress. Scientia Horticulture 102, 15-27.
Marcelis LFM, Heuvelink E, Goudriaan J. 1998. Modelling biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: a review. Sci. Hort. 74, 83–111.
Marron N, Delay D, Petit JM, Dreyer E, Kahlem G, Delmotte FM, Brignolas F. 2002. Physiological traits of two Populus x euramericana clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp, during a water stress and re-watering cycle. Tree Physiol, 22(12), 849-858.
Mehr-afarin A, Maighany f, Baghestani MA, Mirhadi MJ. 2008. Evaluation of biodiversity of field bindweed population in Varamin (Iran). Rostaniha, 9(1), 100-112.
Myrbadyn AR. 2009. Consolidated Forestry appropriate trees and shrubs. Institute of Applied Agriculture Press, first edition, 237 pages.
Munawarti A, Taryono, Semiarti E, Sismindari S. 2014. Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Glagah (Saccharum spontaneum L.) Accessions to Drought Stress. The Journal of tropical life science, 4(1), 61-66.
Myers BJ, Landsberg JJ. 1989. Water stress and seedling growth of two eucalypt species from contrasting habitats. Tree Physiology, 5, 207-218.
Nicholas S. 1998. Plant resistance to environmental stress, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9, 214–219.
Oliva MA, Barros NF, Gomes MMS, Lopes NF. 1989. The development of dieback symptoms in Eucalyptus camaldulensis seedlings as related to moisture stress and mineral nutrition. Revista Árvore, 13, 19-33.
Osborne SL, Schepers JS, Francis DD, Schlemmer MR. 2002 .Use of spectral radiance to in season biomass and grain yield in nitrogen and water-stressed corn. Crop Sci. 42, 165-171.
Palled YB, Chandara Shekharaiah AM, Radder GD. 1985. Response of Bengal gram to moisture stress. India Journal Agronomy, 30, 104-106.
Rad MH, Assare MH, Meshkat MA, Soltani M. 2011. Effects of drought stress on biomass, several growth parameters and water use efficiency of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh) in response to drought stress. Iranian Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 19(1), 13-27.
Patel MS, Golakia BA. 1988. Effect of water stress on yield attributes and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), Indian J. Agric. Sci. 58, 701–703.
Pita P, Pardes JA. 2001. Growth, leaf morphology, water use and tissue water relation of Eucalyptus globules clones in response to water deficit, Tree Physiol. 21, 599–607.
Rezaipoorbaghedar A, Hakimi M.H, Sadeghinia M, Azimzadeh HR. 2011. Effect of Some Soil Properties on Distribution of Eurotia ceratoides and Stipa barbata in Baghedar, Bafgh Rangelands. Journal of Rangeland Science, 2(1), 417-424.
Rieger M, Dummel MJ. 1992. Comparison of drought resistance among Prunus species from divergent habitats. Tree Physiol. 11, 369–380.
Sabeti H. 2007. Forests, trees and shrubs of Iran. Yazd University, Press, 806 pages.
Sadrzadeh M, Moalemi N. 2007. Effect of water stress and potassium on growth characteristics of young olive plants cvs. Baghmalek and Zard. Agricultural research, water, soil and agriculture, 6(4), 1-10.
Sapeta H, Costa JM, Lourenco T, Maroco J, van der Linde P, Oliveira MM. 2013. Drought stress response in Jatropha curcas: Growth and physiology. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 85, 76-84.
Seki M, Ishida J, Narusaka M, Fujita M, Nanjo T, Umezawa T, Kamiya A, Nakajima M, Enju A, Sakurai T, Satou M, Akiyama K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Carninci P, Kawai J, Hayashizaki Y, Shinozaki K. 2002. Monitoring the expression pattern of around 7,000 Arabidopsis genes under ABA treatments using a full length cDNA microarray, Funct. Integr. Genomics, 2, 282-291.
Shaban M, Khajedin SJ, Karimzade HR, Panahpur A. 2009. Study on Drought Resistance wood species suitable for the development of green space. Journal of Research in Science, Agricultural Science, 5(1), 57-67.
Shukla N, Awasthi RP, Rawat L, Kumar J. 2012. Biochemical and physiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by Trichoderma harzianum under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 54, 78-88.
Taiz L, Zeiger E. 2002. Plant Physiology. 3rd edition. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland.
Tardieu F, Granier C, Muller B. 1999. Modeling leaf expansion in a fluctuating environment: are changes in specific leaf area a consequence of changes in expansion rate? New Phytol. 143, 33–43.
Turner NC. 1997. Further progress in crop water relations. Adv. Agron. 58, 293–338.
Whittemore AT. 2005. Genetic Structure, Lack of Introgression and Taxonomic Status in the Celtis laevigata-C. reticulata Complex (Cannabaceae), Journal of Systematic Botany, 30(4),809–817.
Wright GC, Rao RCN, Farquhar GD. 1994. Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in peanuts under water deficit conditions. Crop Sci. 34, 92–97.
Yin C, Duan B, Wang X, Li C. 2004. Morphological and physiological responses of two contrasting Poplar species to drought stress and exogenous abscisic acid application. Plant Science, 167, 1091-1097.
Yin C, Wang X, Duan B, Luo J, li C. 2005. Early growth, dry matter allocation and water use efficiency of two sympatric Populus species as affected by water stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 53, 315–322.
Sayed Abdolhossein Tabatabaei, Hamid Jalilvand, Hamid Ahani (2014), Drought stress response in caucasian hackberry: growth and morphology; JBES, V5, N3, September, P158-169
https://innspub.net/drought-stress-response-in-caucasian-hackberry-growth-and-morphology/
Copyright © 2014
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0