Ecological aspects of weed flora of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) fields of Visakhapatnam District, A.P., India

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2011
Views (915)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Ecological aspects of weed flora of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) fields of Visakhapatnam District, A.P., India

Prayaga Murty Pragada, Salugu Bodayya Padal, Borra Rama Krishna, Duvvada Srinivasa Rao, VadamaLakshmi Narayana
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 1(6), 30-38, December 2011.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2011; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Turmeric (Curcuma longa L) is one of the most valuable spices all over the world and important medicinal plant. Visakhapatnam is one of the turmeric (Curcuma longa L) growing areas it is being grown during rainy season and is a long duration crop. Turmeric fields are severely infested with 118 (94 dicots, 24 monocots) weed species belonging to 99 genera and 36 families. Parthenium hysterophorus was most abundant weed followed by Elephantopus scaber, Merremia hederacea, Merremia tridentata and Conyza stricta etc . Parthenium hysterophorus followed by Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon and Trianthema portulacastrum, Boerhavia diffusa etc., were found to be most densely populated weeds. Cyperus rotundus, Parthenium hysterophorus, Boerhavia diffusa and, Cynodon dactylon and Trianthema portulacastrum etc. were high frequency species. TheImportant Value Index calculated for the individual weed species encountered in field revealed interesting results. Parthenium hysterophorus was the most important species followed by the Cyperus rotundus, Trianthema portulacastrum, Cynodon dactylon and Boerhavia diffusa. Out of 118 species: A class is representedby 56 species followed by 37 under B, 19 under C and 4 under D, 2 species under E. There is an urgent need to take necessary intervention to create awareness among the farmers for adopting integrated weed management strategies to improve and maintain the quality and yield of turmeric. Further research work is needed in the fields of weed control and weed biology.

Adiseshu G. 1997. Ecological aspects of weed flora of Sugarcane fields at Anakapalle Ph.D. Thesis submitted to the Andhra University, Visakhapatnam.

Anonymous 1999. Production  Year Book,  Food and Agriculture Organization of UnitedNation, Rome.

Chandra Singh DJ, Narayana Rao K. 1973. Weed flora of Andhra Pradesh. PANS 19(2), 223-229.

Curtis JT, Mclntosh RP. 1950. The interrelationships of certain analytic and synthetic Phytosocioogical characters. Ecology 31, 434-455.

Dangal RL, Singh AD, Singh T, Sharma A, Sharma C. 2010. Common weeds of Rabi(winter) crops of Tehsil Nowshera district rajouri (J7K), India. Pak. J. Weed Sci.Res. 16(1), 39-45.

Daulay HS, Singh KC. 1982. Chemical weed control in greengram and clusterbean. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 52(11), 758-763.

Frick B, Thomas AG. 1992. Weed surveys in different tillage systems in south-western Ontario field crops. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72, 1337-1347.

Frick    B, Thomas AG. 1992. Weed surveys in different tillage systems in south-western Ontario field crops. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72, 1337-1347.

Gupta A, Joshi SP, Manahas RK. 2008. Multivariate analysis of diversity and composition of weeds communities of wheat fields in Doon valley india, trop. Ecol. 49, 103 112.

Hermann PTA, Martin AW. 1991. Pharmacology of Curcuma longa. Planta Med. 57, 1-7.

Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP. 1977. The World‟s Worst Weeds. University Press of Hawai, Hawai.

McClosky WB, Baker PB, Sherman W. 1998. Survey of cotton weeds and weed control practices in Arizona upland cotton fields. Publication AZ1006 cotton: College of Agric., Univ. Of Arizona.

Misra R. 1968. Ecology workbook. Oxford and IBH publishing company Ltd., New Delhi.

Morse LE, Kartesz JT, Kutner LS. 1995 Native vascular plants. Our Living Resources: A Report to the Nation on the Distribution, Abundance, and Health of U.S. Plants, Animals and Ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, DC, p. 205-209.

Muller-Dombois Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Prayaga Murty P. 2009. Studies on Weed Flora of Crop Fields of North Coastal Andhra Pradesh, India Ph.D Thesis, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam.

Randall JM. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biologicaldiversity. Weed Tech. 10, 370-381.

Fröhlich J, Fowler SV, Gianotti A, HillR, Kilgore E, Morin L, Sugiyama L,Winks C. 2000. Biological control of mist flower (Ageratina riparia, Asteraceae) in New Zealand. Proc., Xth International Symp. on Biological Control of Weeds, 4-14 July1999, Bozeman, Montana USA, p. 51-57.

Hassan G, Marwat KB. 2001. Integrated weed management inagricultural crops.National Workshop on Technologies for Sustainable.

Manjunath  MN,  Sattigeri  VV,  Nagaraj  KV. 1991. Curcumin in turmeric. Spice India 4(3), 7-9.

Pujari PD, Patil RB, Sakpal RT. 1986. “Krishna” – A high yielding variety of turmeric. Indian Cocoa, Arecanut and Spices J. 14, 65-66.

Rabbani N, Bajwa R. 2001. Weeds distribution in rice fields offive districts of the Punjab. Pak. J. Bot. 33 (special issue), 541-549.

Rao VS. 1986. Principles of Weed Science. Oxford and I.B.H.Pub.Co., New Delhi.

Raunkiaer C. 1934. The Life forms of Plants and Statistical   Plant   Geography.   Clarendon   Press, Oxford.

Sen DN. 1981. Ecological Approaches to Indian weeds. Geobios International, Jodhpur.

Tadulingam C, Narayana GV. 1932. A  Hand Book  of  some  South  Indian  weeds.  Govt  Press, Madras.

Related Articles

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.

Effects of environmental stressors on morphological traits of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and microbial diversity of soil treated with cadmium and lead

Fortune Onyeuka Otumunye*, Tobore Roseline Agbosa, Boniface Edegbai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 42-49, June 2026.

SWAT+-based water balance assessment of Ipil watershed in Bohol, Philippines: Spatial and temporal patterns of water availability

Anselmo M. Aurestila*, Proceso M. Castil, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 30-41, June 2026.