Effect of conjunctive use of waste and ground water on yield and crop water productivity of cluster bean

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2017
Views (745)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of conjunctive use of waste and ground water on yield and crop water productivity of cluster bean

Kashif Ali Abro, Ashifa Soomro, Shakeel Ahmed Soomro, Ahmed Ali Tagar, Irfan Ahmed Shaikh
Int. J. Biosci. 11(6), 159-165, December 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The scarcity of good quality irrigation water is a serious problem in arid and semi- arid zones of the World. The increasing demand for food, fodder and fibre has therefore compelled to explore the possibilities of using wastewater conjunctively for irrigating crops. A study at Agriculture Research Substation Shikarpur was carried out in 2015-16 to evaluate the effect of conjunctive use of waste and ground water irrigation on cluster bean crop (Cyamposis tetragonoloba L). The study comprised of four treatments i.e. I1 (groundwater), I2 (wastewater 25% + groundwater 75%), I3 (wastewater 50% + groundwater 50%) and I4 (wastewater 75% + groundwater 25%). The experiment results revealed that after sowing, soil EC (dSm-1) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) were observed to be higher in treatment I4 as compared to other treatments, whereas pH in treatment I4 resulted minimum. It was observed that cluster bean when treated 75% wastewater + 25% groundwater (treatment I4) resulted maximum plant height (75.50cm), weight plant-1 (93g), yield plot-1 (7.44kg) and yield hactre-1 (9725.50). Crop water productivity was also observed to be significantly higher (4.01kgm-3) when treated with 75% wastewater (treatment I4), which then significantly decreased with decreasing wastewater content. The study concluded that, the conjunctive use of waste and ground water can successfully be adopted for cultivation in water scarce area.

Arain GB. 2013. Crop manager agronomy centre pivot irrigation system valley irrigation Pakistan (private), limited. www.valleyirrigation pakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Guar-Cultivation-in-Pakistan.pdf. [Accessed on 04-02-2015].

Azaiez MN. 2002. A model for Conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water with opportunity cost. European Journal of Operational Research 143 (3), 611-624.

Bo yang X, Kong A, Cui B, Jin D, Deng Y, Zhuang x, G. Zhuang Z. Bai. 2015. Impact of rural domestic wastewater irrigation on the physiochemical and microbiological properties of Pakchoi and Soil. Water 7, 1825-1839.

Bouyoucos JB. 1962. Hydrometer method for making particle-size analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal 54, 464-465.

Breen PF. 1992. Artificial wet land for wastewater treatments: A review with particular reference to rural areas. In: CSIRO Division of water resources: Research areas pertinent to intensive rural industry. Waste management (K.H. Bowmer and P. Lunt Eds.) 34-36. divis report, 92/4.

Clemet A, Ensink J. 2006. Farmer driven wastewater treatment: A case study from Faisalabad. Pakistan, www.wedc.lboro.ac.uk/conferences/pdfs/32 /Clemet.Pdf.

CSIRO. 1995. Effluent irrigated plantations: design and management. CSIRO Technical Paper No. 2.

Dara SS. 1993. Water Pollution. In A textbook of environmental chemistry and pollution control. S. Chand and Co. Ltd. Nagar, New Delhi pp. 64-65.

Faby JA, Brissaud F, Bontoux J. 1999. Wastewater Reuse in France Water Quality Standards and Wastewater Treatment Technologies. Water Science and Technology 40 (4-5), 37-42.

Hussain I, Raschid L, Hanjra MA, Markar F, Van der Hoek W. 2002. Waste water use in agriculture: review of impacts and methodological issues in valuing impacts. Working Paper 37, Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Manag Insti.

Isaac RK, Swaroopand N, Kumar JLG. 2009. Effect of conjunctive use of water on yield components and marketable yield of radish crop. Journal of Science and Technology 29(2), 131-136.

Khali S, Kakar MK. 2011. Agricultural Use of Untreated Urban Wastewater in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 1(1), 21-26.

Mahmood S, Maqbool A. 2006. Impacts of wastewater irrigation on water quality and on the health of local community in Faisalabad. Pakistan Journal of Water Resources 10, 19-22.

Majeedano HI. 2012. Agro Digest. Agronomy Section, Agriculture Research Institute, Tandojam 45.

Pakissan R. 2015. Cluster bean (Guar) gum product, Physiology, Genetics and cultivation pp. 1-46.

Pescod. 1992. Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture- FAO Irrigation and Drain paper 47, FAO, Rome pp. 125.

Qadir M, Sharma BR, Bruggeman A, Chourkd-Allah R, Karajeh F. 2007. Non-conventional water sources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries. Agricultural Water Management 87(1), 2-22.

Rowell DL. 1994. The preparation of saturation extracts and the analysis of soil salinity and sodicity. In Soil Science Methods and Applications. Ed. D.L. Rowell. Longman Group UK

Salinity Laboratory Staff US. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali `soils. Handbook, No. 60 USDA. US. Govt. Print. Office Washington DC.

Singh PK, Deshbhratar PB, Ramteke DS. 2012. Effects of sewage wastewater irrigation on soil properties, crop yield and environment. Agricultural Water Management 103, 100-104.

Thawale PR, Jawarkar AS, Kulkarni AB, AA Juwarkar. 2006. Lysimeter studies for evaluation of changes in soil properties and crop yield using wastewater. Inter Journal Tropical Agriculture      17, 231-244.

World Bank. 2005. Conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water”, shaping the future of water for agriculture a sourcebook for investment in Agricultural Water Management. www.siteresources. worldbank.org/INTARD/Resources/Shaping_the_ Future_of_Water_for_Agriculture. pdf

Related Articles

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.

Valorisation of table waste and fruit waste by black soldiers (Ullicens hermetica)

Ayaba Adéline Hounnou, Vanessa Chabi, Jomini Marc Sène Alitonou, Franck Sokenou, Mickael Vitus Martin Kpessou Saïzonou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo, Guy Alain Alitonou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 123-128, April 2026.

Murraya koenigii (Linn.) Spreng.: An opulent source of fatty acid

Shahin Aziz*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 116-122, April 2026.

Design and architecture of an IoT-enabled bamboo resource management system: Data-driven approach for sustainable agriculture

Charlot L. Maramag*, Dorothy M. Ayuyang, Richard R. Ayuyang, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 107-115, April 2026.

Physicochemical and microbiological characterization of flours from the local variety of purple corn (Zea mays L.) produced and marketed in Katiola (Côte d’Ivoire)

Moumouny Traore*, N´Zebo Desiré Kouame, Pepiesin Marie Ange Melem Soro, Zamblé Bi Irié Abel Boli, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 98-106, April 2026.

In the shadows of governance: Exploring youth participation in local peacebuilding initiatives

Juramie R. Rubia, Benny R. Rubia, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 85-97, April 2026.

Evaluation of the agronomic performance, beta-carotene content and dry matter content of 228 sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) genotypes in Burkina Faso

Nattan Gamsore*, Koussao Some, Djakaridja Tiama, Pauline Bationo_Kando, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 73-84, April 2026.

Geomatics tools for agricultural and farm disaster risk management and reduction: A survey of farmers in South-South coastal communities, Nigeria

G. O. Nwodo, O. J. Ugwu, E. U. Onah, A. Ugwuoti, E. Elijah Ebinne*, O. P. Nogheghase, S. I. Ogbaa, U. E. Ahuchaogu, T. O. Ogbuji, C. P. Owuamalam-Chidi, C. O. Osuagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, O. E. Mbakaogu, J. U. Chikaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 59-72, April 2026.