Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Effect of different application rates of organic, inorganic and farmyard manure fertilizer on Zea mays L., growth and yield production

Research Paper | October 1, 2016

| Download 9

Zahoor Ahmed, Tariq Ismail, Kanval Shaukat, Abdul Qadir, Saima Masood, Asma Yousafzai

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.9( 4), 321-327, October 2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/9.4.321-327


IJB 2016 [Generate Certificate]


Maize is highly cultivated cereal crop in the world, due to its nutritional value it use as a staple food for human and fodder for livestock. The research was carried out by sowing of maize under the natural conditions by using four treatments (Control, Urea, FYM and NPK) in Randomized Complete Block Design. The NPK treated plot showed the maximum average height 188.27cm and the minimum average height 139.26cm was observed in control plants. Growth and yield parameters showed significant results by the use of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potash, i.e. average 2.3 cobs/plant and average 450.8 seeds/cob followed by Urea and Farm Yard Manure while control plots showed  average 1.5 cobs/plant and average 359.75 seeds/cob were the minimal numbers of cobs and grains.


Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Effect of different application rates of organic, inorganic and farmyard manure fertilizer on Zea mays L., growth and yield production

Adediran J, Taiwo L, Akande M, Sobulo R, Idowu O. 2005. Application of organic and inorganic fertilizer for sustainable maize and cowpea yields in Nigeria. Journal of Plant Nutrition 27 (7), 1163-1181.

Adekayode F, Olojugba M. 2010. The utilization of wood ash as manure to reduce the use of mineral fertilizer for improved performance of maize (Zea mays L.) as measured in the chlorophyll content and grain yield. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 1 (3), 40-45.

Amujoyegbe B, Opabode J, Olayinka A. 2007. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on yield and chlorophyll content of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench). African Journal of Biotechnology 6 (16).

Asghar A, Ali A, Syed W, Asif M, Khaliq T, Abid A. 2010. Growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars affected by NPK application in different proportion. Pakistan J Sci 62 (4), 211-216.

Ayoola O, Makinde E. 2007. Complementary organic and inorganic fertilizer application: influence on growth and yield of cassava/maize/melon intercrop with a relayed cowpea. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 1 (3), 187-192.

Bibi Z, Khan NU, Akram M, Khan QU, Khan MJ, Batool S, Makhdoom K. 2010. Maize response to integrated use of NP-fertilizers and compost. Pak J Bot 42 (4), 2793-2801.

Jaliya M, Falaki A, Mahmud M, Sani Y. 2008. Effect of sowing date and NPK fertilizer rate on yield and yield components of quality protein maize (Zea mays L.). ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 3 (2), 23-29.

Lelei J, Onwonga R, Freyer B. 2009. Organic based nutrient management strategies: effect on soil nutrient availability and maize (Zea mays L.) performance in Njoro, Kenya. Afr J Agric Res 2, 92-99.

Nasir A, Khan F, Riaz M, Khan M. 2010. Comparative study of biogas slurry with farmyard manure as fertilizer on maize crop. Int J Sci Agric 22, 297-301.

Serna-Saldivar SO. 2010. Cereal grains: properties, processing, and nutritional attributes. CRC Press.

Sharifi RS, Taghizadeh R. 2009. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars to different levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 7 (3-4).

Uwah D, Eneji A, Eshiet U. 2011. Organic and mineral fertilizers effects on the performance of sweet maize (Zea mays l. Saccharata strut.) In south eastern rainforest zone of Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 3 (1), 54.

Walsh O, Raun W, Klatt A, Solie J. 2012. Effect of delayed nitrogen fertilization on maize (Zea mays L.) grain yields and nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of  Plant Nutrition 35 (4), 538-555.