Effect of different levels of nitrogen on phonological parameters of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars under different climatic conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2020
Views (239) Download (10)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of different levels of nitrogen on phonological parameters of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars under different climatic conditions

Muhammad Younus Ahmedani, Amjed Ali, Muhammad Ehsan Safdar, Tasneem Khaliq
Int. J. Biosci.17( 5), 124-132, November 2020.
Certificate: IJB 2020 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of different levels of nitrogen on phonological parameters of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars under different climatic conditions of Punjab (Pakistan) (College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Regional Agriculture Research Institute Bahawalpur and Adaptive Research Farm Dera Ghazi Khan) during the year 2016. These different environments have resulted in the adoption of the same crop management practices and cultivars comprising both conventional and non-conventional varieties (MNH-786 non –Bt and FH-142 and FH-Lalazar Bt) with different doses of nitrogen fertilizer viz. 0, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 kg nitrogen per hectare. Results of the experiment showed that among different levels of nitrogen minimum number of days to bud initiation(39.19 days) in Dara Ghazi Khan, flowering ( 50.66 days) in Dara Ghazi Khan, boll opening (99.44 days) Dara Ghazi Khan and boll maturation (108.94 days) in Bahawalpur location was recorded where we applied no dose of nitrogen (0 kg ha-1). While among different varieties the minimum number of days to bud initiation (35.18 days) in Sargodha location by non-BT MNH-786, day to flowering (53.06 days) in Dara Ghazi Khan by non-BT MNH786, day to boll opening (105.19 days) in Dara Ghazi Khan by BT variety FH Lalazar and boll maturation (116.49 days) in Bahawalpur location by cotton cultivar FH 142. It concluded that no application of nitrogen to cotton cultivars under Dera Ghazi Khan location result in maximum phonological parameters of cotton.

VIEWS 10

Akhter M, Cheema MS, Jamil M, Shahid SA, Shahid MI. 2002. Response of cotton genotypes to time of sowing. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1, 538-539.

Ali H, Muhammad D, Aftzal MN, Abid SA. 2005. Seed cotton yield of different cultivars as affected by sowing time under agroclimatic conditions of Southern Punjab. The Indus Cotton 2, 186-189.

Ali MA, Tatla YH, Aslam MJ. 2007. Response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to potassium fertilization in arid environment. Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 191-198.

Anjum R, Soomro AR, Babar SB, Soomro AW, Memon AM. 2002. Predicting earliness by different indicators in cotton-III. Indus Journal of Plant Sciences 1(1), 9-14.

Arshad M, Wajid A, Maqsood M, Hussain K, Aslam M, Ibrahim M. 2007. Response of growth, yield and quality of different cotton cultivars to sowing dates. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 44, 208-212.

Asha R, Lal Ahamed M. 2013. Screening of Cotton Genotypes for Heat Tolerance. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 4(4), 599-604.

Ayissaa T, Kebedeb F. 2011. Effect of nitrogenous fertilizer on the growth and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties in middle Awash, Ethiopia Journal of Drylands 4(1), 248-258.

Bange MP, Caton SJ, Milroy SP. 2008. Managing yields of high fruit retention in transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using sowing date. African Journal of Agriculture Research 59, 733-741.

Bange MP, Milroy SP. 2004. Impact of short-term exposure to cold temperatures on early development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). African Journal of Agriculture Research 55, 655-664.

FAO. 2003. Agro-ecological zones. Report on the project 1, Methodology and Results for Africa, Rome.

Gallagher JN, Biscoe PV. 1978. Radiation absorption and yield of cereals. Journal of Agriculture Sciences 19, 47-60.

Habib S, Azhar FM, Manzoor T, Aulak MA, Farooq S. 2013. Study of biochemical and agronomic traits relating to earliness in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Journal of Agricultural Research 51(2), 109-119.

Hezhong D, Weijiang L, Wei T, Zhenhuai L, Ongmei Z, Yuehua N. 2006. Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China. Field Crops Research 98, 106-115.

Hou Z, Li P, Li B, Gong J, Wang Y. 2007. Effect of fertigation scheme on N uptake and NUE in cotton. Plant Soils 290, 115-126.

Imran A, Wajid SA, Shakoor A, Shabir MA. 2016. Assessing Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Various Bt-Cotton Cultivars under Semi-arid Conditions of Faisalabad. Journal of Agriculture and Basic Sciences 3(2), 2518-4210.

Iqbal M, Chang MA, Jabbar A, Iqbal MZ, Hassan M, Islam N. 2003. Inheritance of earliness and other characters in upland cotton. Journal of Biological Sciences 3(6), 585-590.

Jalota SK, Sood A, Butter GS, Sidhua S, Sharma PK. 2009. Simulating the effect of temperature on growth and yield of Bt cotton under semi-arid conditions of Punjab, India. Proceedings of workshop 17–18 December. Space Applications Centre (ISRO) Ahmedabad, India, p 44-47.

Kakani VG, Reddy KR, Koti S, Wallace TP, Prasad PVV, Reddy VR, Zhao D. 2005. Differences in in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of cotton cultivars in response to high temperature. Annals of Botany 96, 59-67.

Kassianenko VA, Dragavtsev VA, Razorenov GI, Razorenov TS. 2003. Variability of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) with regard to earliness. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50, 157-163.

Khan MB, Dar JS. 2006. Response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum l.) cultivars to different levels of nitrogen. Journal of Research Science 17(4), 257-261.

Luo Q, Bange M, Clancy, L. 2014. Cotton crop phenology in a new temperature regime. Ecological Modeling 285, 22-29.

Panhwar GN, Soomro AR, Anjum R, Babar SB, Memon AM, Soomro AW.  2002. Predicting earliness in cotton during crop development stage-11. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1, 37-38.

Panhwar R, Soomro AR, Ansari BA, Panhwar SA, Memon S.  2010. Exploring most efficient and reliable parameters to measure earliness in cotton (G. hirsutum L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture 26(1), 39-44.

Panhwar RB, Akbar A, Panhwar BU, Panhwar GA, Feng Bai-li. 2018. Effects of plant spacing and nitrogen fertilizer levels on cotton yield and growth. International Journal of Science and Environmental Technology 7(1), 313-324.

Pettigrew WT. 2008. The effect of higher temperature on cotton lint yield production and fiber quality. Crop Sciences 48, 278-285.

Rehana A, Soomro AR, Chang MA. 2001. Measurement of earliness in upland cotton. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 4, 462-463.

Saira B, Soomro AR, Rehana A, Soomro AW, Memon AM. 2002. Predicting earliness by different indicators in cotton-11. Indus Journal of Plant Sciences 1(1), 28-32.

Saleem MF, Anjum SA, Shakeel A, Ashraf MY, Khan HZ. 2009. Effect of row spacing on earliness and yield in cotton. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41(5), 2179-2188.

Sarwar M, Saleem MF, Wahid MA, Shakeel A, Bilal MF. 201. Comparison of Bt and non-Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars for earliness indicators at different sowing dates and nitrogen levels. Journal of Agricultural Research 50(3), 335-347.

Singh RP, Prasad PVV, Sunita K, Giri SN, Reddy KR. 2007. Influence of high temperature and breeding for heat tolerance in cotton: A review in Advances of Agronomy 93, 313-385.

Soomro AR, Mehmood Z, Illahi N, Allahyar. 2004. Earliness comparison in new cotton strains of CCRI Multan. Indus Journal of Plant Sciences 3(1), 1-4.

Soomro AR, Rehana A, Saira B, Memon AM, Soomro AW. 2002. Predicting earliness by different indicators in cotton-I. Indus Journal of Plant Sciences 1(1), 36-41.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dicky DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biomatric approach 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill book Co. Network USA.