Effect of different methods of zinc application on yield and quality of flue cured virginia Tobacco

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2016
Views (315) Download (8)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of different methods of zinc application on yield and quality of flue cured virginia Tobacco

Aamir Iqbal, Asad Saeed, Sajida Perveen, Rana Abdul Samad, Fatima Rafique, Madiha Anam, Shahbaz Atta Tung, Fariha Saleem
Int. J. Biosci.9( 6), 1-7, December 2016.
Certificate: IJB 2016 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to find out the response of various methods of Zn application on the final produce and quality of the cured Virginia (FCV) tobacco (Nicotiana tabaccum L.) variety T.M 2008. Four different application methods i.e. Soil application at (3 and 6 kg Zn ha -1), Foliar spray ¬(0.25 and 0.5 kg Zn-1), root dipping (2% and 5% Zn suspension) at the time of transplantation and Fertigation (3 and 6 kg Zn-1) were used. The plot without Zn was regarded as control. Zn was taken from ZnSO4 along with Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potash in the form of compound fertilizer i.e. NPK (12:15:20). The data showed that maximum K concentration in leaf (34.43 g kg-1), Zn in leaf (3.27 g kg-1), nicotine content (2.81%), total sugars (15.51%) and chloride content (0.91%) were recorded in soil D2 treatment. Maximum green leaf yield (17190 kg ha-1) and leaf yield after curing (3228 kg ha-1) were recorded in soil D1 treatment while foliar D2 gave favorable leaf yield after curing (17120 kg ha-1). The application of 6 kg ha -1 Zn enhanced the K uptake and Zn in tobacco leaves as well as nicotine content and total sugars, while 3 kg ha-1 improved green leaf and leaf yield after curing. Conclusively, 3 kg as well as 6 kg Zn -1 in soil is the optimum method of fertilizer application and can be recommended for higher yield and quality in tobacco leaves.

VIEWS 11

Ahmad KN, Rehman G, Shah P. 2001. Response of soil and foliar application of Zn and copper on yield and quality of sugarcane varieties. Pakistan Sugar Journal 16, 98-105.

Akehurst BC. 1981. Tobacco Tropical Agriculture, The Longman Series, London.

AOAC. 2000. Association of official analytical chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th (ed), Washington, D.C.

Begum M, Noor M, Miah H, Basher MM. 2003. Response of rate and method of Zn application on growth and yield of aus rice. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 6(7), 688-692.

Broadley MR, White PJ, Hammond JP, Zelko I, Lux A. 2007. Zinc in plants. New Phytologist 173(4), 677–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01996.x

Cakmak I. 2008. Enrichment of cereal grains with Zn: Agronomic or genetic biofortification. Plant and Soil 302(1-2), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9466-3.

Chari MS. 1995. Role of research in the improvement of productivity and quality of Indian fluecured Virginia tobacco. Central Tobacco Research Institute, Rajahmundry, India.

Gaines TP, Mitchell GA. 1979. Boron determination in plant tissue by the azomethine H method. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis 10(8), 1099-1108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103627909366965.

Idrees QM. 2001. Response of different seedling sizes and NPK doses of fertilizer on the yield and quality of flue-cured virgina tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum).PhD thesis, NWFP Agricultural University, Pakistan, 48-49 P.

Kastori R. 1990. Essential micronutrients. In: Physiological Role and Importance in Crop Production. Scientific Book. Belgrade [in Serbian].

Kena K, Kelsa K. 1990. Response of NPK fertilizers on the yield and quality of flue-cured leaf tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science 12(1-2), 77-82.

Lazarevic K, Nikoli´c D, Stosi´c L, Milutinovi´c S, Videnovi´c J, Bogdanovi´c D. 2012. Determination of lead and arsenic in tobacco and cigarettes: an important issue of public health. Central European Journal of Public Health 20(1), 62–66.

Parker MB, Douglas CF, Baker SH, Stephenson MG, Gaines TP, Miles JD. 1993. Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Experiments on Flue-cured Tobacco. Agricultural Experiment Stations, University of Georgia.

Poustini G, Shamel RMT. 2000. Physiological and agronomic response of 2 burley tobacco cultivars to nitrogen fertilizers. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 31(2), 363-369. [in Persian]

Rehman H. 1993. Response of foliar application of Zn, manganese and boron in combination with urea on the yield and fruit quality of sweet orange cv.”blood red”. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Sanaullah, Zada K. 2004. Response of potash, Zn, and boron on growth, yield and other characteristics of spring maize. M.Sc. (Hons.) thesis, KPK Agricultural University, Pakistan.

Sarwar S, 1992. Studies on the Response of different doses and methods of Zn application on growth, yield and quality of cucumber. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 18, 363-365.

Sharma BD, Katyal JC. 1986. Evaluation of amounts, methods and sources of zinc application to wheat in flood plain soils. The Journal of Agricultural Science 106(1), 41-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600061700.

Steel, RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. 3rd (Ed). McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. New York, USA.

Stellenbosch B. 2002. Determination of sugar (Direct acid hydrolysis). International course of hydroponics production, 45-54.

Walsh LM, Schulte EE. 1977. Optimum soil test levels of SO4-S in Wisconsin soils. The S institute, Washington, D.C.

Wang C, Zhang SH, Wang PF, Hou J, Zhang WJ, Li W, Lin ZP. 2009. The effect of excess Zn on mineral nutrition and antioxidative response in rapeseed seedlings. Chemosphere 75(11), 1468-1476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.033.