Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Effect of different rates of nitrogen fertilizer on growth, seed yield, yield components and quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under arid environment of Saudi Arabia

Research Paper | August 1, 2015

| Download 4

Samir G. Al-Solaimani, Fahad Alghabari, Muhammad Zahid Ihsan

Key Words:

Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.7( 2), 1-7, August 2015


IJAAR 2015 [Generate Certificate]


Canola (Brassica napus L.) was planted for two consecutive seasons (2004-05 and 2005-06) in the Arid Land Agricultural Research Station, King Abdul Aziz University at Hada Al-Sham to determine the effect of different rates of nitrogen fertilizer (0, 60, 120 and 180 kg N/ha) on crop growth, seed yield, yield components and seed quality. Nitrogen was applied in three equal splits, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after planting during each crop season. Randomized complete block design, with four replications was used. Statistical analysis of the obtained data presented that nitrogen at a rate of 180 kg N/ha dominated other N rates of 120, 60, 0 kg N/ha for plant growth, yield and quality parameters except seed oil content that were higher at 120 Kg N/ha level. An overall improvement of 59% in plant height, 112% in number of branches, 111% in number of fruits/plant, 87% in 1000 seed weights and 19% in crude protein content were documented for 180 Kg N/ha. On contrary a reduction of 5% in oil content was recorded by moving from 120 Kg N/ha to 180 Kg N/ha. Current results suggested that N at a rate of 180 Kg/ha can be adopted as best level of nitrogen fertilizer for canola cultivation under arid land conditions of Saudi Arabia.


Copyright © 2015
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Effect of different rates of nitrogen fertilizer on growth, seed yield, yield components and quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under arid environment of Saudi Arabia

Ahmad G, Jan A, Arif M, Jan MT, Khattak RA. 2007. Influence of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under rainfed conditions. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 8, 731-737.

Al- Barrak KM. 2006. Irrigation interval and nitrogen level effects on growth and yield of canola (Brassica napus L.), Scientific Journal of King Faisal University (Basic and Applied Sciences) 7, 87-103.

Alberta Agriculture. 1984. Irrigation Canola Production. Agdex No. 149/561-1. Alberta Agriculture, Edmonton, Alberta.

Allen EJ, Morgan DG. 1975. A quantitative comparison of the growth, development and yield of different varieties of oilseed rape. Journal of Agriculture Science 85, 159-174.

Al-Suhaibani NA. 2009. Influence of early water deficit on seed yield and quality of faba bean under arid environment of Saudi Arabia. Am-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture Environmental Science 5, 649-654.

Brennan RF, Mason MG, Walton GH. 2000. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the concentrations of oil and protein in canola (Brassica napus) seed. Journal of Plant Nutrtion 23, 339-348.

Cheema MA, Malik MA, Hussain A, Shah SH, Basra SMA. 2001. Effects of time and rate of nitrogen and phosphorus application on the growth and the seed and oil yields of canola (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 186, 103-110.

Commodity Research Bureau. 2005. CRB commodity year book. Commodity Research Bureau, Jersey City, NJ.

Dubey OP, Sahu TR, Garg DC. 1994. Responses and economics in relation to nitrogen and sulphur nutrition in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 39, 49-53.

Economic Research Service USDA. 1996. Crambe, industrial rapeseed, and tung provide valuable oils. In: Industrial Uses of Agricultural Materials. September, 17–23.

Elewa TA, Mekki BB, Bakry BA, El-Kramany MF. 2014. Evaluation  of  Some Introduced Canola (Brassica napus L.) Varieties under Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels in Newly Reclaimed Sandy Soil. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 21, 746-755.

El-Nakhlawy F.S. 1996. Effect of planting date and N-fertilization on performance of rapeseed, Menofiya Journal of Agriculture Research 21, 101-107.

El-Nakhlawy FS, El-Fawal M. 1991 Evaluation of rapeseed potential as affected by row spacing and nitrogen fertilization. Acta Agronomica Hung 40, 103-110.

FAOSTAT 2014. Data, (2013). Food and Agricultural commodities production, Rome, Italy. Available online at: http://faostat.fao.org [Accessed 01 March 2015].

Hao X, Chang C, Travis GJ. 2004. Short communication: effect of long-term cattle manure apllication on relations between nitrogen and oil content in canola seed. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 167, 214-215.

Hocking PJ, Randall PJ, Demarco D. 1997. The response of dry canola to nitrogen fertilizer: partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Research 54, 201-220.

Hopkins WG, Hunter NPA. 2004. Introduction to Plant Physiology. 3rd Edn, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, ISBN: 978-0-471- 38915-6, pp: 576.

Javaheri M, Shiranirad AH, Daneshian J, Amiri E, Saifzadeh S. 2014. Evaluation of chemical and organic nitrogen sources on yield and yield component of canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. International Journal of Biosciences 5, 47-54.

Khaliq A, Matloob A, Ihsan MZ, Abbas RN, Aslam Z, Rasool F. 2013. Supplementing herbicides with manual weeding improves weed control efficiency, growth and yield of direct seeded rice. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 15, 191-199.

Kumar S, Sing J. Dhingra KK. 1997. Leaf area index relationship with solar-radiation interception and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) as influenced by plant population and nitrogen, Indian Journal of Agronomy 42, 348-351.

Kutcher HR, Malhi SS, Gill KS. 2005. Topography and management of nitrogen and fungicide affects diseases and productivity of canola. Agronomy Journal 97, 533-541.

Lambers H, Poorter H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Advance Ecological Research 23, 187-261.

Malhi SS, Gan Y, Raney JP. 2007. Yield, seed quality, and sulfur uptake of Brassica oilseed crops in response to sulfur fertilization. Agronomy Journal 99, 570-577.

Muhammad N, Cheema MA, Wahid MA, Ahmad N, Zaman M. 2007. Effect of source and method of nitrogen fertilizer application on seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L.), Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Science 44, 74-78.

Öztürk Ö. 2010. Effects of source and rate of nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components and quality of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 70, 132-141.

Qaderi MM, Kurepin LV, Reid DM. 2012. Effects of temperature and watering regime on growth, gas exchange and abscisic acid content of canola (Brassica napus) seedlings. Environmental and Experimental Botany 75, 107-113.

Rathke GW, Christen O, Diepenbrock W. 2005. Effects of nitrogen source and rate on productivity and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown in different crop rotations. Field Crops Research 94, 103-113.

Raymer PL. 2002. Canola: an emerging oilseed crop. Trends in new crops and new uses 1, 122-126.

Steel RG, Torrie JH. 2000. Principles and Procedures of Statistics in Scientific Research, 4th Ed. McGraw-Hill, N.Y. USA.

White C, Roques S, Berry, P. 2015. Effects of foliar applied nitrogen fertilizer on oilseed rape (Brassica napus). The Journal of Agricultural Science 153, 42-55.

Wiedenhoeft M, Barton BA. 1994. Management and environment effects on Brassica forage quality. Agronomy Journal 86, 227–237.

Yasari E, Patwardhan AM. 2006. Physiological analysis of the growth and devolvementof rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 5, 745-752.