Effect of different sowing dates on yield contributing traits of Mash bean (Vigna mungo L.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2014
Views (253) Download (3)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of different sowing dates on yield contributing traits of Mash bean (Vigna mungo L.)

Hafiz Bashir Ahmad, Muhammad Amir Amin, Iqbal Hussian, Ch. Muhammad Rafique, Muhammad Naveed, Muhammad Aslam Awais, Muhammad Shafiq, Muhammad Aqeel
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.5( 6), 42-48, December 2014.
Certificate: IJAAR 2014 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Optimum sowing time and a promising variety are of prime importance to catch potential yield of any crop. Sowing time affects plant physiological and morphological specifications like effect on vegetative and reproductive periods, harvest time, yield and its quality. To achieve good yield, crop must be sown at appropriate time. In this regard, yield response of two mash bean genotypes namely mash-97 and ES-1 sown at different sowing dates was studied under field conditions during Kharif 2009 and 2010. Results of study showed that number of fruit bearing branches, 1000-grain weight, pods per plant, seeds per plant and grain yield were significantly affected by sowing dates and higher seed yield was recorded when crop was sown at June 28. The genotype ES-1 gave significantly the highest seed yield compared to mash-97.

VIEWS 5

Ali A, Malik MA, Nadeem MA, Tahir M, Sohail R. 2002. Production potential of mash bean genotypes in response to phosphorus application. International. Journal of Agriculture and Biology 4, 355–356.

Amanullah JI, Hayat TF, Khan AI, Khan N. 2002. Effect of sowing dates on yield and yield components of mash bean varieties. Asian Journal Plant Science 1, 622-624.

Escalante JA, Miranda S, Kohashi SJ. 1989. Manual removal of reproductive organs: Their effect on flowering duration and age at physiological maturity in Phaseohs vulgaris L. 39, 40-45.

Freed, Eisensmith SP. 1989. Mstatc Statistical Package. Crop and Soil Department, University Extension Services, University of Michigan, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

Government of Pakistan. 2011. Economic Survey. Economic Advisors Wing, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad.

Green CF, Paulson GA, Ivins JD. 1985. Time of sowing and the development of winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 105, 217-221.

Ihsanullah FH, Taj, Akbar H, Basir A, Noorullah. 2002. Effect of row spacing on the agronomic traits and yield of mung bean {Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek}. Asian Journal of Plant Science 1, 328-329.

Ismail AMA, Khalifa FM. 1897. Irrigation, planting date and intra- row spacing effects on soybean grown under dry farming systems. Qatar University Science 7, 149-167.

Kannaiyan S. 1999. Bioresource technology for sustainable agriculture. Associated Publishing Company. New Delhi pp: 422.

Maqsood M, Hassan MU, Iftikhar M, Mehmood MT. 2001. Effect of different levels of phosphorus on agronomic traits of two mash bean genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 81-3.

Marlene PB, Rodiño AP, De Ron AM, Santalla AM. 2008. Effects of planting season and plant cultivar on growth, development, and pod production in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 1121–1129.

Moniruzzaman M, Rahman SML, Kibria MG, Rahman AM, Kaisar MO. 2007. Performances of vegetable french bean as influenced by varieties and sowing dates in rabi season. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production 2, 69-73.

Pakistan Economic Survey. 2008-09. government of Pakistan. Finance Division, Islamabad.

Poehlman, JM. 1991. The mung bean. Oxford and IBH publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Dehli India.

Radulovich RA. 1990. AQUA, a model to evaluate water deficits and excesses in tropical cropping. Agricultural Forest Meteorology 52, 253-261.

Rattanawongsa N. 1993. The 19th International mungbean nursery trial. ARC-AVRDC Training Report.

Samanta SC, Faruk-E-Azam AKM, Rashid MH. 1999. Effects of sowing dates on grain yield, protein and mineral contents of five mungbean cultivars. Thai Journal Agricultural Sciences 32, 171-177.

Sarwar G, Sadiq MS, Saleem M, Abbas G. 2004. Selection criteria in F3 and F4 population of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 36, 297-310.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey D. 1996. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Ed. pp: 172-177 McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. New York, USA.

Sugui FP, Sugui CC. 2002. Response of chickpea to dates of sowing in Ilocos Norte, Philippines. Int. Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletters 9, 13.

Vange T, Obi IU. 2006. Effect of planting date on some agronomic traits and grain yield of upland rice varieties at Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development and Agricultural Environment 2, 1-9.

Yan-sheng L, Qiu-ying Z, Qing-lu Gao S, Herbert J, Hashemi A. 2010. Influence of sowing date on phonological stages, seed growth and marketable yield of four vegetable soybean cultivars in North-eastern USA. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 2556 – 2562.

Yoldas F, Esiyok D. 2007. Effects of sowing dates and cultural treatments on growth, quality and yield of processing beans. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10, 2470-2474.