Effect of different sucrose concentrations on the vase life of different protea cultivars (Protea leucadendron and leucospermum)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2013
Views (235) Download (6)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of different sucrose concentrations on the vase life of different protea cultivars (Protea leucadendron and leucospermum)

Innocent Pahla, Tavagwisa Muziri, Simbarashe Muzemu, Chiedza Mhlanga
Int. J. Biosci.3( 9), 208-213, September 2013.
Certificate: IJB 2013 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Many researchers have recommended carbohydrates supply as a remedy to improve vase life, however the actual application rates are seldom known. An experiment was laid out as a 4 x 4 factorial Structure in a randomized complete block design (RCBD); at Midlands State University Agricultural Laboratory to determine the most effective sucrose concentration in delaying leaf blackening in different protea varieties. Procedures were developed for the pulsing of protea varieties using different sucrose concentrations. Four protea varieties (High Gold, Tango, Scarlett Ribbon, and Safari Sunset) were treated with four different sucrose concentrations (0ppm, 30ppm, 40ppm, 50ppm) with the aim of determining the most effective sucrose concentrations in extension of vase life and delaying leaf blackening. Number of days taken to onset of leaf desiccation and leaf blackening were recorded. The results showed that, there was a significant interaction (p<0.05) on the effect of different sucrose concentrations and protea varieties on vase life. There were significant differences on the effectiveness of different sucrose concentration in extension of vase life of different protea varieties. It was concluded that 40ppm was the most effective sucrose concentration in almost all the varieties and Safari Sunset had the longest vase life of all the varieties.

VIEWS 11

Armitage AM. 1991. The Georgia Report – Stage of flower development at harvest. The Cut Flower Quarterly 3(1), 13

Bieleski RL. 1992. Sugar alcohols in: A. Loewus and W. Tanner (eds.). Plant carbohydrates I. Intracellular carbohydrates. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, NS vol. 13A. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Corr B, Eisenberg. 1982. Improving the post-harvest handling of holiday flowering plants. St. Flor. Assoc. Bul.

Downs CG, Reihana M, Dick H. 1988. Bud opening treatments to improve gypsophilla quality after transport. Scientia Hort 34.

Halevy AH, Mayak S. 1979. Senescence and postharvest physiology of cut flowers Part 1. Hort Review 1, Janick, J. ed. AV1, Westport.

Hammer PA. 1980. Other Flowering Pot Plants. R. A. Larson.ed. Introduction to Floriculture. New York. Academic Press Inc.

Hardenburg RE, Watada AE, Wang CY. 1986. The commercial Stage of Fruits, Vegetables and Florist and Nursery Stocks.

Kofranek T and Halevy B. 1976. Sucrose pulsing or Gladiolus stems before storage to increase spike quality. Hort Science 11, 572- 573.

Prasad A, Kumah V. 2003. Commercial Floriculture, Agribios.

Pun UK, Shimuzu H, Tanase K, Ichimura K . 2005. Effect of sucrose on ethylene biosynthesis in cut spray carnation flowers. Acta Hort (ISHS), 669 .

Sacalis JN . 1993. Cut Flower Prolonging Freshness–Post production Care and Handling 2nd ed, Ball Publishing, Batavia. IL – USA.

Stevens IA. 2002. Sucrose pulsing on cut flowers.

Terril A. Nell. 1993. Flowering Potted Plants Prolonging Shelf Performance, Ball Publishing, Batavia, USA.

Van Doom WG. 2000. http;//www.actahort.org.

Woltering EJ. 2002. Effects of ethylene on ornamental pot plants; a classification. Scientia Hort

Wouter G. 2003. Senescence and postharvest physiology of cut flowers Part 2. Hort Review 1, Janick, J. ed. AV1, Westport.