Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | January 1, 2014

| Download 2

Effect of host plants on life history traits of Dysdercus koenigii (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae)

Muhammad Nadir Naqqash, Shafqat Saeed, Waqar Jaleel, Syed Muhammad Zaka, Qamar Saeed

Key Words:

J. Bio. Env. Sci.4(1), 187-194, January 2014


JBES 2014 [Generate Certificate]


Red Cotton Bug, Dysdercus koenigii F., (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae) also called cotton stainer is a destructive pest of cotton and many other economical crops in Asia. D. koenigii feeds on a variety of hosts including cotton. It damages the crop by sucking sap and staining lint by its faeces. Being important pest of many important crops, the present work was planned to study the comparative biology and biometrics most appropriate word of D. koenigii on cotton, okra and simal under laboratory condition. Significantly lesser nymphal duration was observed in cotton 23.42±1.38 days as compared to okra and simal 28.20±2.08 and 28.39±1.96 days respectively. The longer adult life was observed on cotton (female 20.85±6.17 days and male 16.18±6.11 days) and simal (female 20.11±3.19 days and male 15.41±2.37 days) than the okra (female 17.60±2.58 days and male 10.92±2.49 days). In case of cotton D. koenigii mates three times in its life, while in case of okra it mates 1-2 times and it mates only once in its life period in case of Simal. Numbers of eggs laid were significantly higher in case of cotton 109.06±32.60 as compared to okra (52.93±8.72 eggs) and simal (43.63±13.29 eggs). Better vigor was observed in case of case of cottonseeds. Biology and life cycle studies on different hosts will help researchers and farmers to develop IPM strategies accordingly.


Copyright © 2014
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Effect of host plants on life history traits of Dysdercus koenigii (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae)

Abro GH, Syed TS, Tunio GM, Khuhro MA. 2004. Performance of transgenic Bt cotton against insect pest infestation. Biotechnology 3, 75- 81.

Agelopoulos N, Birkett MA, Hick AJ, Hooper AM, Pickett JA, Pow EM, Smart LE, Smiley, DWM, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM. 1999. Exploiting semiochemicals in insect control. Pesticide Science 55, 225- 235.

Ahmad I, Mohammad FA. 1983. Biology and immature systematics of red cotton stainer Dysdercus koenigii (Fabr.) (Hemiptera: Pyrrohocoridae) with a note on their phylogenetic value. Bulletin of Zoology 1, 1- 9.

Ahmad I, Schaefer CW. 1987. Food plant and feeding biology of the Pyrrhocoroidea (Hemiptera). Phytophophaga 1, 75- 92.

Anonymous. 2013. Fatty acid Composition, http://www.jatropha.pro/oil_composition.htm.

Anwar F, Rashid U, Mahmood Z, Iqbal T, Sherazi TH. 2011. Inter–varietal variation in the composition of Okra (Hibiscus esculentusL.) seed oil. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43, 271- 280.

Ashfaq S, Khan IA, Saeed M, Saljoki AR, Kamran S, Mamzor F, Shoail K, Habib K, Sadozai A. 2011. Population dynamics of insect pests of cotton and their natural enemies. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 27, 251- 253.

Awmack CS, Leather SR. 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 817- 844.

Beck SD. 1956. A biomodal response to dietary sugars by an insect. Biological Bulletin 10, 219-228.

Dhillon MK, Gujar GT, Kalia V. 2011. Impact of Bt cotton on insect biodiversity in cotton ecosystem in India. Pakistan Entomologist 33, 161- 165.

Foster SP, Harris MO. 1997. Behavioural manipulation methods for insect pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 42, 123- 146.

Freeman P. 1947. A revision of the genus Dysdercus boisduval (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae), excluding the American species. Transactions of Royal Entomological Society London 98, 373- 424.

Heikal MT, Mossa ATH, Nawwar GAM, El– Sherbiny M, Ghanem HZ. 2012. Protective Effect of a Synthetic Antioxidant “Acetyl Gallate Derivative” against dimethoate Induced DNA Damage and Oxidant/Antioxidant status in Male Rats. Journal of Environmental and Analytical Toxicology 2, 155 (doi: 10.4172/2161–0525.1000155).

Hibbs ET, Dahiman DL, Rice RL. 1964. Potato foliage sugar concentration in relation to infestation by the potato leafhopper, Empoasca fabae (Harr) (Homoptera:Cicadellidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 57, 517- 521.

Jayaraj S. 1967. Effect of leafhopper infestation on the metabolism of carbohydrate and nitrogen in castor varieties in relation to their resistance to Empoasa flavescens F. (Homoptera: Jassidae). Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 5, 156- 162.

Kamble ST. 1971. Bionomics of Dysdercus koenigii Fabr. Journal of the New York Entomol. Society. 79, 154- 157.

Kapur AP, Vazirani TG. 1960. The identity and geographical distribution of the Indian species of the genus Dysdercus boisduval (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae). Rec. Indian. Mus., 54, 107- 150.

Kohno K, Ngan BT. 2004. Effects of host plant species on the development of Dysdercus cingulatus (Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 39, 183- 187.

Lu ZQ, Xu YH. 1998. The consideration of the incessant outbreak of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Entomological Knowledge 35, 132- 136.

Maltais JB, Auclair JL. 1957. Factors in resistance of peas to the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harr) (Homoptera: Aphididae) I. The sugar nitrogen ratio. Canadian Entomologist 89(3), 65- 370.

Maxwell–Lefroy H. 1908. The red cotton bug (Dysdercus cingulatus Fabr.). Memoirs of the Department of Agriculture in India. Entomological Series 2, 47- 58.

Rastogi RP, Mahrotra BM. 1980–84. Compendium of India Medicinal Plant. CSIR Luck now Publication and information directorate 1, 2. New Dehli.

Saeed R, Sayyed AH, Shad SA, Zaka SM. 2010. Effect of different host plants on the fitness of diamond–back moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Crop Protection 29, 178- 182.

SAS Institute. 2002. The SAS System for Windows, Release 9.0, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

Saxena KN. 1969. Patterns of insect–plant rela-tionships determining susceptibility or resist-ance of different plants to an insect. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 12, 751- 766.

Sequiera R, Dixon AFG. 1996. Life history responses to host quality changes and competition in the Turkey–oak aphid. European Journal of Entomology 93, 53- 58.

Singh OP, Parihar SBB. 1988. Effect of different hosts on the development of Heliothis armigera Hub. Bulletin of Entomological Research 29, 2168- 2172.

Stern VM, Smith RF. 1960. Factors affecting egg production and oviposition in populations of Colias philodice eurytheme. Hilgardia 29, 411- 454.

Thangavelu  K.  1978.  Some  notes  on  the  host specificity of dusky cotton bug, O. laetus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Journal of Natural History London 82, 481- 486.

Thapa RB, Neupane FP. 1985. Biology of the Red Cotton Bug, Dysdercus koenigii Fab. (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae). Journal of the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science 6, 11- 20.

Van Emden, HF. 1973. Aphid host plant relationships: Some recent studies; in Perspectives in Aphid Biology, 54–64 ed. A.D. Lowe. Entomological Society of New Zealand Bulletin 2.

Umbanhowar J, Hastings A. 2002. The impact of resource limitation and the phenology of parasitoid attack on the duration of insect herbivore outbreaks. Theoretical Population Biology 62, 259-269.

Van-Doesburg, PH Jr. 1968. A revision of the new world species of Dysdercus Guérin Méneville  (Heteroptera, Pyrrhocoridae). Zoologische Verhandelin 97, 1- 215.

Varma HS, Patel RK. 2012. Biology of red cotton bug (D. Koenigii). Agres an International e-journal., 1, 148- 156.

Venugopal  KJ,  Kumar  D,  Singh  AK.  1994. Development studies on proteins from haemolymph, fat body and ovary of a phytophagous pest Dysdercus koenigii. Journal of Biochemistry 10, 297- 302.

Wadnerkar DW, Gailkawad BB, Thombrev T. 1979. New record of alternate host plant of red cotton bug  Dysdercus koenigii  (Fabr.).  Indian  Journal  of Entomology 41, 185.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background