Effect of nitrogen fertilizer different levels on economic indices, energy balance indices and greenhouse gases of current rice cultivars in Guilan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2013
Views (907)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of nitrogen fertilizer different levels on economic indices, energy balance indices and greenhouse gases of current rice cultivars in Guilan

Ebrahim Azarpour, Ghasem Farajpour
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 3(10), 1-11, October 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Today, all countries of world try to get progress in productivity in other word; they try to get more output by decreasing input usage. In order to study the effects of application nitrogen level fertilizer on energy indices and economic indices of rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.), an experiment as factorial in RCBD with three replications was conducted during 2009 year in the Rice Research Institute, Iran, Rasht, central of Guilan and Rudsar, East of Guilan. Also, for this purpose, a number of questionnaires were prepared and distributed among the rice producers of the examined region. Factors were cultivar (Khazar, Ali Kazemi and Hashemi), and nitrogen fertilizer levels (0, 30, 60, and 90 Kg N/ha). Results indicated that cultivar and nitrogen fertilizer significantly effected on energy indices and economic indices. Khazar have the highest production energy to consumption energy ratio among cultivars. With increasing N fertilizer application, production energy to consumption energy ratio increased significantly. Hashemi and Khazar have the highest benefit to cost ratio among cultivars. With increasing N fertilizer application, benefit to cost ratio increased significantly. Khazar have the highest productivity among cultivars. With increasing N fertilizer application, productivity increased significantly.

Azarpour E, Moradi M. 2013. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of Rice Varieties under Traditional and Semi-mechanized Farming Systems in North of Iran. Biomass, InTech-Open Access Company 1-37.

Browne NA, Eckarda RJ, Behrendt R, Kingwell RS. 2011. A comparative analysis of on-farm greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural enterprises in South eastern Australia. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166, 641-652.

Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Porter JR. 2001. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agriculture Ecosystem Environ 87, 51-65.

De Jonge AM. 2004. Eco-efficiency improvement of a crop protection product: the perspective of the crop protection industry. Crop Protection 23, 1177– 86.

Eskandari Cherati F, Bahrami H, Asakereh A. 2011. Energy survey of mechanized and traditional rice production system in Mazandaran Province of Iran. Arican Journal of gricultural Research 6, 2565-2570.

Ghahderijani M, Pishgar Komleh SH, Keyhani A, Sefeedpari P. 2013. Energy analysis and life cycle assessment of wheat production in Iran. African Journal of Agricultura Research 8, 1929-1939.

Haefele SM, Naklang K, Hampichitvitaya D, Jeara Kongman, Skulkhu E, Romyen p, phasopa S, Tabtim S, Suriya – arunroj D, khunthasuvon S, kraisorakull D, Young suk p, Amarante ST, wade, LJ. 2006. Factors affecting rice yield and fertilizer response in rain fed lowlands Thailand. Field crops Research 8, 39-51.

Ho JA. 2011. Calculation of the carbon footprint of Ontario wheat. Guelph publication 4, 49-55.

Khan S, Khan MA, Latif N. 2010. Energy requirements and economic analysis of wheat, rice and barley production in Australia. Soil & Environment 29, 61-68.

Khush GS, Coffman WR, Beachell HM, 2001. The history of rice breeding: IRRI’s contribution. In: Rock Wood, W.G. (Ed.), Rice Research and Production in 21st Century: Symposium Honoring Robert F. Chandler Jr. International Rice Resaech Institute, Los Bagnos, Philippines, pp. 117-135.

Khush GS. 2005. What it will take to feed 5.0 Billion Rice consumers in 2030. Plant Molecular Biology 59, 1-6.

Lincoln T, Edvardo Z. 2006. Assimilation of mineral nutrition. In: Plant physiology (4th ed.), Sinaur Associates, Inc. Pub. P.O. Box. 407, Sunderland. 705 p.

Marschner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press London.

Moradi M, Azarpour E. 2011. Study of energy indices for native and breed rice varieties production in Iran. World applied sciences journal 13, 137-141.

Pathak H, Wassmann R. 2007. Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture: Generation of technical coefficients. Agriculture Systems 94, 807-825.

Peng S, Khush GS. 2003. Four decades of breeding for varietal improvement of irrigated lowland rice in the International Rice Research Institute. Plant Production Science 6,157-316.

Qasemi-Kordkheili P, Kazemi N, Hemmati A, Taki M. 2013. Energy consumption, input–output relationship and economic analysis for nectarine production in Sari region, Iran. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5, 125-131.

Related Articles

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.

Effects of environmental stressors on morphological traits of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and microbial diversity of soil treated with cadmium and lead

Fortune Onyeuka Otumunye*, Tobore Roseline Agbosa, Boniface Edegbai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 42-49, June 2026.

SWAT+-based water balance assessment of Ipil watershed in Bohol, Philippines: Spatial and temporal patterns of water availability

Anselmo M. Aurestila*, Proceso M. Castil, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 30-41, June 2026.