Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Effect of nitrogen rates and weed interference on yield and yield components of corn (zea mays)

Research Paper | July 1, 2015

| Download 2

Safar Nasrollahzadeh, Aysan Hajebrahimi, Jalil Shafagh-Kolvanagh, Sajjad Shaker-Kouhi

Key Words:

Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.7( 1), 1-6, July 2015


IJAAR 2015 [Generate Certificate]


Time of weed control and fertilizer application usually decide the profitability of crop production. The effects of nitrogen and weed interference duration on yield and yield components of corn was studied in the Research Station of University of Tabriz, Iran, in 2009. The experiments were carried out as split-plot, based on randomized complete block design with three replications. Nitrogen application rates (0, 70 and 140 kg/ha) were included in the main plots and 10 weed interference periods(two sets: weedy control and weed-free control) in subplots. Results showed that with increasing weed interference period, number of grain per ear, number of grain rows per ear, 1000 seed weight and grain yield decreased. The most sensitive yield components to weed interference were the number of grain per ear. Also, nitrogen levels had not significant effect on yield and yield components. However,the maximum corn grain yield (970 g/m2) was obtained with the control treatment full season weed-free.


Copyright © 2015
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Effect of nitrogen rates and weed interference on yield and yield components of corn (zea mays)

Abouziena HF, El-Karmany MF, Singh M, Sharma SD. 2007. Effect of nitrogen rates and weed control  treatments  on  maize  yield  and  associated weeds  in  sandy  soils.  Weed  Technology  21,1049-1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-084.1

Abubaker S. 2008. Effect of Plant Density on Flowering Date, Yield and Quality Attribute of Bush Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) under Center Pivot irrigation system. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3(4), 666-668. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2008.666.668

Anderson RL. 2000. Cultural systems to aid weed management in semi arid corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology 14(3), 630-640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890037X(2000)014[063 0:CSTAWM]2.0.CO;2

Ansar M, Shahzad MA, Nasim M, Musa M, Shahid HA. 1996. Effect of nitrogen and weed density on maize growth and yield. Journal of Agricultural Research34(2), 99-105.

Akhtar M, Mehmood A, Ahmad J, Iqbal K. 2000. Nitrogen uptake efficiency in wheat as influenced by nitrogen levels and weed-crop competition duration. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 3(6), 1002-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2000.1002.1003

Bakht J, Khalil SK, Shah Z, Sanaullah EH, Qayyum A. 1989. Plant height, maturity and stalk yield of maize sown alone and in different combinations under various levels of nitrogen. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 5(1), 101-106.

Barlow EW, Young JL. 1977. Photosynthesis, transpiration and leaf elongation in corn seed ling at suboptimal soil temperatures. Agronomy Journal 69, 95-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006 900010025x

Blackshaw RE, Brandt RN, Janzen HH, Ents T, Grant CA, Derksen DA. 2003. Differential Response of Weed Species to Added Nitrogen. Weed Science51, 532-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/00431745(2003)051[0532:DROWST]2.0.CO;2

Camara KM, Payne WA, Rasmussen PE. 2003. Long Term Effects of Tillage, Nitrogen, and Rain Fall on Winter Wheat Yields in the Pacific Northwest. Agronomy journal 95, 828-835. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.0828

Delibaltova V. 2014. Response of maize hybrids to different nitrogen applications under climatic conditions of Plovdiv region. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences 3(4), 408-412.

Evans SP, Knezevic ZC, Lindquist LJ, Shapiro CA. 2003. Influence of nitrogen and duration of weed interference on corn growth and development. Weed Science 51(4), 546-556.

Evans SP, Knezevic ZC, Lindquist LJ, Shapiro AC, Blankenship EE. 2003. Nitrogen application influence the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Science 51(3), 408-417.

Hans SR, Johnson WG. 2002. Influence of Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Interference on Corn (Zea mays L.) Yield and Nitrogen Accumulation. Weed Technology 16, 787-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890037X(2002)016[0787:IOSSBL]2.0.CO;2

Lutz CA. 2007. Effects of different weeding regimes and fertilizer types on the performance of maize. Weed Science 8(3), 333-338.

Sadeghi H, Parsley M. 2001. Effect of plant density and nitrogen fertilizer on maize seed physiological indicators SC704. Journal of Crop Science 3, 25-13.

Thomas JM, Weller SC, Ashton FM. 2002. Weed Science. Principles and Practices. 4th ed. United States of America.

Tollenaar M, Nissanka SP, Aguilera A, Weise SF, Swanton CJ. 1994. Effect of weed interference and soil nitrogen on four maize hybrids. Agronomy Journal 86, 596-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008 600040004x

Vengris J,  Colby  WG,  Drake  M.  1955.  Plant nutrients competition between corn and weeds. Agronomy Journal 47(3), 213-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004 700050005x