Effect of planting density on growth, development and yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 15/09/2022
Views (2278)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of planting density on growth, development and yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Md. Nurul Huda, Shahadat Hossain, Tanzim Jahan, Md. Arfan Ali, Md. Golap Hossain
Int. J. Biosci. 21(3), 209-214, September 2022.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2022; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of planting density on the growth, development, and yield of tomatoes during the Rabi season 2019-2020. Plant height, number of primary branches, number of flowers per cluster, number of fruits per cluster, number of fruits per plant, individual fruit weight, fruit yield per plant, total yield, marketable yield, and unmarketable yield were recorded. Results showed that maximum plant height and unmarketable yield were recorded at 40,000 plants ha-1. However, number of primary branches, number of flowers per cluster, number of fruits per cluster, number of fruits per plant, individual fruit weight, and fruit yield per plant were higher at 25,000 plants ha-1. Moreover, the maximum total yield and marketable yield were recorded at 28,571 plants ha-1 and the minimum at 40,000 plants ha-1. Therefore, our present study recommended cultivating tomato crops at 28,571 plants ha-1 to obtain a higher yield.

Alam MS, Huda MN, Rahman MS, Azad AKM, Rahman MM, Molla MM. 2019. Character association and path analysis of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 22(1), 1815-1822. DOI: 10.18801/jbar.220119.223.

Assefa W, Tesfaye B, Dessalegn L. 2015. Influence of Inter-Intra Row Spacing on Yield Losses of Tomato Cultivars. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(2), 15-28.

BBS. 2021. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics-2020. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics and Informatics Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 340-341. www.bbs.gov.bd.

FAOSTAT. 2022. FAOSTAT statistical database. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data /QC/visualize. Accessed February 17, 2022.

Guade YF. 2017. Effect of Intra-Row Spacing on Growth and Development of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Variety Roma-VF under the Irrigated Conditions of East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 17(2), 174-178.

Hamid AA, Salih SO, Abdalla AE, El Naim AM. 2010. Effect of Sowing Date and Plant Density on Growth and Yield of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum, Mill.). Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 6(5), 665-669.

Hossain MG, Ali MA, Ripa RA, Ayrin S, Mahmood S. 2019. Influence of Rootstocks on Yield and Quality of Summer Tomato cv. ‘BARI Tomato-4’. Earth Systems and Environment 3(2), 289- 300. DOI: 10.1007/s41748-019-00101-4.

Huda MN, Jahan T, Taj HFE, Asiry KA. 2020. A Newly Emerged Pest of Tomato [Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)]: In Bangladesh- A Review on Its Problems and Management Strategies. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International 21(3), 1-16.

Hussen S, Kemal M, Wasie M. 2013. Effect of Intra-row Spacing on Growth and Development of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) Var. Roma VF, at the experimental site of Wollo University, South Wollo, Ethiopia. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 10(1), 19-24.

Law-Ogbomo KE, Egharevba RKA. 2009. Effects of Planting Density and NPK Fertilizer Application on Yield and Yield Components of Tomato (Lycospersicon esculentum Mill) in Forest Location. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(2), 152-158.

Maboko MM, Du Plooy CP, Chiloane S. 2017. Yield of determinate tomato cultivars grown in a closed hydroponic system as affected by plant spacing. Horticultura Brasileira 35, 258-264. DOI 10.1590/S0102-053620170217.

Maboko MM, Du Plooy CP. 2018. Response of Field-Grown Indeterminate Tomato to Plant Density and Stem Pruning on Yield. International Journal of Vegetable Science 24(6), 612-621.

Nganga GM. 2017. Effect of plant spacing and inorganic fertilizer rate on tomato seed production. MS thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya, 16-22.

Papadopoulos AP, Ormrod DP. 1991. Plant spacing effects on growth and development of the greenhouse tomato. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71(1), 297-304. DOI: 10.4141/cjps91-040.

Prodhan MAA, Ali MA, Zomo SA, Sarkar MD, Parvin K, Haque FA. 2014. Organic manure and spacing affecting floral and yield characters of tomato. International journal of business, social and scientific research 2(2), 90-94.

Rashid A, Rab A, Mohammad H, Ali J, Shahab M, Jamal A, Rehman A, Ali M. 2016. Effect of row spacing and nitrogen levels on the growth & yield of tomato under walk-in polythene tunnel condition. Pure and Applied Biology 5(3), 426-438. DOI: 10.19045/bspab.2016.50055.

Shanmukhi CH, Reddy MLN, Rao AVDD, Babu AP. 2017. Effect of planting density and fertigation on growth and yield of processing tomato varieties. International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology 5(3) (Special issue-2), 78-81.

Shanmukhi CH, Reddy MLN, Rao AVDD, Babu PA. 2018. Flowering and yield in processing tomato varieties as influenced by planting density and fertigation. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(2), 3481-3485.

Tuan N, Mao N. 2015. Effect of Plant Density on Growth and Yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at Thai Nguyen, Vietnam. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 7(6), 357-361. DOI: 10.9734/IJPSS/2015/18573.

Warner J, Hao X, Zhang TQ. 2002. Effects of row arrangement and plant density on yield and quality of early, small-vined processing tomatoes. Effects of row arrangement and plant density on yield and quality of early, small-vined processing tomatoes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82, 765-770.

Zakher AG. 2017. Effect of plant density and spraying with aluminum silicate on fruit yield and quality of processing tomato grown in summer season. Menoufia Journal of Plant Production 2, 149-167.

Related Articles

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.