Effect of polyethylene glycol on the amount of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total leaf of sugar beet genotypes

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2014
Views (725)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of polyethylene glycol on the amount of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total leaf of sugar beet genotypes

Mojtaba Ghasemi Fahim, Bahram Mirzamasoumzadeh, Babak Ahadzadeh
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(1), 233-237, January 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Photosynthesis was one of important physiological processes in the plant. Water shortages would reduce its intensity. Photosynthesis persistency and maintaining leaf chlorophyll under stress conditions were physiological features of stress resistance. So, this research was performed on 2012 at greenhouse in order to investigate the effect of polyethylene glycol on chlorophyll a, b and Total on three sugar beet genotypes. Experiment was done as Two-factor factorial in form of randomized complete block design with three replications. Factor a (stress level: 1 normal irrigation, 2: Polyethylene glycol 6000 with 30% concentration) and factor b (genotypes) was performed. Results showed that the factors a and b were not significant in All traits. But interaction between factors level a × b showed significant differences at the 5% level the two characters of chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll. Bilateral comparison showed that the combination (normal × genotype 7233-P29) with an average of 6.36 had highest levels of chlorophyll a and combination (PEG 6000 × genotype- 7233-P29) with an average of 3.79 had lowest level. The composition of the total chlorophyll (PEG 6000 × genotype Jolge and normal × genotype 7233-P29), respectively, with a mean of 7.83 and 7.93 had highest Total chlorophyll and combination (PEG 6000 × genotype-7233-P29) with an average of 5.44 had lowest amount. Rate of chlorophyll a and b are increased with stress intensity, but this issue was not true about total chlorophyll and with increasing stress intensity, total chlorophyll was decreased.

AbdollahianNoghabi M. 1999.Ecophysiology of sugar beet cultivars and Weed species subjected to water deficiency stress. Ph.D. Thsis, University of Reading.

Cook DR, Scott C. 1998. Sugar from Science to Practice. Translation: Faculty Improvement Institute Beet Seed. Publications Produced Sugar Beet Seed Improvement Institute, p. 731.

Cooke DA, Scott RK. 1993 The sugar Beet crop science into practice. London, new York chapmon and Hall. 675:456 -469.

Fischr RA, Wood JT. 1989. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivar, yield associations with morpho-phisiological traits. Australian Journal Agricultural 30, 1001-1020.

Gusegnova IM, Suleymanov S, Aliyev JA. 2006. Protein composition and native state of pigments of thylakoid membrane of Wheat genotypes differently tolerant to water stress. Biochemistry 71. 223-228.

Hardgree SP, Emmerich WE. 1990. The effect of polyethylene glycol exclusion on the water potential of solution-saturate filter paper. Plant Physiology 92, 462-466.

Hauny B. 2001. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidantion in the adaptation two season grasses to localized drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 45,105-114.

Kafi M, Mahdavi-Damghani A. 2002. Resistance mechanisms of plants to environmental stresses (translation). University of Mashhad.

Kaufman MR, Eckard AN, 1971. Evaluation of stress control by polyethylene glycol byanalysis of guttation. Plant Physiological 47, 453-456.

Madhaj  A,  Fathi  Gh.  2008.  Crop  Physiology. Islamic Azad University Press. p. 128.

Sairam RK, Deshmukh PS, Saxna DC. 1998. Role of antioxidant systems in Wheat genotype tolerance to water stress. Biologia Plantrum 41(3), 387-394.

Wittenmayer L, Merbach W. 2005. Plant responses to drought and phosphorus deficiency: Contribution of phytohormones in root- related processes. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168, 531- 540.

Related Articles

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.

Mobile-based potato leaf disease identifier using ensemble modeling

Karen W. Cantilang*, Laarni M. Ladiao, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 58-64, April 2026.

Diagnostic analysis of pig farms in the North of Côte d’Ivoire: Case of the commune of Korhogo

Seni Kouadio Sylvain*, Kadjo Vincent, Alla Konan Jean Bedel, Yao Koffi Sylvanus Aubert, N’glouan Wadjé Jérôme, Soro Ouation Souleymane, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 48-57, April 2026.

Coral reef condition in Illana Bay, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines: Basis for conservation management

Ruel S. Lasagas, Rosanilio M. Yagos*, Edgardo H. Rosales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 40-47, April 2026.

Preliminary floral and faunal species diversity in Maluyo River in Santol, La Union, Philippines

Judith M. Morales*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 26-39, April 2026.

Challenges and impact of the farmer-scientists training program on community development in Bohol, Philippines

Jeffrey O. Awas*, Anabel J. Intong, Aida T. Salingay, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 8-25, April 2026.

Preliminary yield and growth performance of rice (var nsic rc222) applied with Bacillus spp. based bio-fertilizer

Ronneil B. Alminar*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(3), 39-48, March 2026.