home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Effect of sulfur foliar fertilization on reproductive growth and development of canola

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2017
Views (465) Download (19)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of sulfur foliar fertilization on reproductive growth and development of canola

Shah Khalid, Muhammad Zahir Afridi, Imranuddin, Nadia, Faisal Nadeem, Muhammad Aamir, Saddamullah
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.11( 3), 61-67, September 2017.
Certificate: IJAAR 2017 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Ammonium SulphateCanolaFoliar applicationReproductive growth

Abstract

Plant nutrients availability at appropriate time and amount is inevitable to harvest optimum yield. A field experiment was conducted, to evaluate the effects of sulphur foliar fertilization on reproductive growth and development of canola. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design, having three replications with a net plot size of 3m × 5m. Data on various growth and yield parameters of canola were recorded. The results revealed that sulphur foliar spray at the rate of 2% as aqueous solution of ammonium sulphate (AS), significantly improved number of pods plant-1, productive pods plant-1, grains pod-1, pod length (cm), 1000 grains weight (g) and grains oil content (%). Highest pods plant-1 (96), pro. Pods plant-1 (69), grains pod-1 (25.3), and seed oil content (36.5%) ware recorded in 2% AS foliar application, however, it was statistically at par with 0.6% AS foliar application, followed by 0.4%AS application, while minimum pods plant-1 (87.6), pro. Pods plant-1 (50.7), grains pod-1 (18), and seed oil contents (32.9%) ware recorded in control (water spray only). From above results it is concluded that 2% A.S foliar application is best for higher yield of canola.

VIEWS 26
Cover PDF

Abd Allah SMM, Eldin MM, Selim SM. 2015. Effect of Nitrogen and Sulfur on Yield, Yield Components, Some Chemical Composition and Nutritional Quality of Canola Plant Grown in Saline Soil Condition. Research Journal Pharmacy andBiochemistry Science 6(3), 1055-1064.

Abdin MZ, Ahmad A, Khan N, Khan I, Jamal A, Iqbal M. 2003.Sulphur interaction with other nutrients. InSulphur in plants (pp. 359-374). Springer Netherlands.

Aires A, Rosa E, Carvalho R. 2006. Effect of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on glucosinolates in the leaves and roots of broccoli sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. italica). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 86(10), 1512-6.

De Pascale S, Maggio A, Orsini F, Bottino A, Barbieri G. 2008. Sulphurfertilisation affects yield and quality in friarielli (Brassica rapa L. subsp. sylvestris L. Janch. var. esculenta Hort.) grown in a floating system. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 83(6), 743-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2008.11512.454

Farahbakhsh H, Pakgohar N, Karimi A. 2006.Effects of nitrogen and sulphur fertilizers on yield, yield components and oil content of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences.

Habtegebrial K, Singh BR. 2006. Effects of timing of nitrogen and sulphur fertilizers on yield, nitrogen, and sulphur contents of Tef (Eragrostistef (Zucc.) Trotter). Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 75(1), 213-22.

Hegde DM, Murthy IY. 2005. Management of Secondary Nutrients. Indian Journal of Fertilisers. 1(9), 93.

Jagetiya BL, Kaur MJ. 2006. Role of thiourea in improving productivity of soybean. International Journal of Plant Science 1, 308-10.

Jamal A, Fazli IS, Ahmad S, Abdin MZ. 2006. Interactive effect of nitrogen and sulphur on yield and quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Korean Journal of Crop Science 51(6), 519-22.

Kandil H, Gad N. 2012. Growth and oil production of canola as affected by different sulfur sources. Journal of Basic and Applied Science Research. 2(5), 5196-5202.

Kandil H, Gad N. 2014. Response of Canola (Brassica napas L.) Production to Cobalt and Ammonium Sulphate as a Source of Sulphur. Journal of Basic and Applied Science Research 4(12), 16-23.

Karamanos RE, Goh TB, Flaten DN. 2007. Nitrogen and sulphur fertilizer management for growing canola on sulphur sufficient soils. Canadian journal of plant science. Apr 1, 87(2), 201-10. https://doi.org/10.4141/P06-133

Katiyar A, Jat A, Singh S. Response of sulphur fertilizers on the yield and oil content of mustard in sandy loam soils of Uttar Pradesh.

Kołota E, Osińska M. 2000. The effect of foliar nutrition on yield of greenhouse tomatoes and quality of the crop. Acta PhysiologiaePlantarum.22, 373-376.

Leustek T, Saito K. 1999. Sulfate transport and assimilation in plants. Plant Physiology. 120: 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.120.3.637

Majumdar SP, Pingoliya AL. 2000. Comparitive efficacy of different sources and levels of sulphur on nutritional quality of mustard.  Madras Agricultural Journal, 87, 477.

Malhi SS, Gill KS. 2002. Effectiveness of sulphate-S fertilization at different growth stagesfor yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola. Canadian Journal of Plant Science82, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.4141/P01-184

Ngezimana W, Agenbag G. 2013. Effects of nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) on canola (Brassica napus L.) vegetative and reproductive growth under controlled conditions. 8(39), 4887-4894.

Rehman H, Iqbal Q, Farooq M, Wahid A, Afzal  I, Basra SM. 2013. Sulphur application improves the growth, seed yield and oil quality of canola. Actaphysiologiaeplantarum. 35(10), 2999-3006.

Sattar A, Cheema MA, Wahid MA, Saleem MF, Hassan M. 2011. Interactive effect of sulphur and nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of canola. Crop & Environment. 2(1), 32-7.

Scherer HW. 2001. Sulfur in crop production. Eurasian Journal of Agronomy 14, 81–111.

Singh S, Gangasaran, 1987. Effect of sulphur and nitrogen on growth, yield, quality and nutrient uptake of Indian rape. Indian Journal of Agronomy 32, 474–5.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey D. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A Biometrics Approach, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Tandon HLS, Messick DL. 2002. Practical sulphur Guide. The Sulphur Institute. Washington, DC.

Trivedi SK, Singh V. 1999. Response of blackgram (Phaseolusmungo. Indian mustard (Brassica junceaL.) cropping sequence tofertilizer application. Indian Journal Agriculture Scicince 69, 86–9.

Submit Manuscript