Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | May 1, 2013

| Download

Effect of weeds competition on some growth parameters of red, white and pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Rouhollah Amini, Hossein Pezhgan, Adel Dabbagh Mohammadinasab

Key Words:

J. Bio. Env. Sci.3(5), 86-93, May 2013


JBES 2013 [Generate Certificate]


In order to investigate the effect of weeds competition on growth parameters of different dry beans, an experiment was conducted at Research Station of Faculty of Agriculture at Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran in 2011. The experiment was conducted as split plot based on randomized completely block design with three replications. The main plots were three types of dry bean including red bean, white bean and pinto bean and the two sub plots were weed free and weed infested treatments. The results indicated that interaction effect of weed treatment × dry bean type on plant height was significant. Weed infested treatment had not significant effect on red bean plant height but reduced the plant height of white and pinto bean. The effect of dry bean type and weed treatment was significant on leaf area index (LAI). The LAI of weed infested treatment was significantly lower than that of weed free. Also the LAI of red and white bean was significantly higher than that of pinto bean. The effect of dry bean type was not significant on dry bean total dry matter (TDM) and crop growth rate (CGR). Weed infested treatment reduced TDM and CGR of dry bean significantly. Among the growth parameters, the LAI was the best index for competitiveness of dry bean against weeds.


Copyright © 2013
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Effect of weeds competition on some growth parameters of red, white and pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Amini R, Fateh E. 2010. Effect of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) on growth indices and yield of red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Sustainable Production Science 20, 113-129.

Amini R, Ghanepour S. 2013. Growth and yield of different types of dry bean affected by smooth amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus L.) shoot extracts. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5, 115-119.

Amini R, Ghanepour S, Movahedpour F. 2013. Morpho-physiological and phenological changes induced by smooth amaranth allelopathic effects in various dry bean types. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5, 120-124.

Armin M, Noormohammadi G, Zand E, Baghestani MA, Darvish F. 2007. Using plant density to increase competition ability in more and less competitive wheat cultivar wild oat. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 6, 599-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2007.599.604

Baghestani MA, Zand E, Soufizadeh S. 2006. Iranian winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) interference with weeds: II. Growth analysis. Pakistan Journal Of Weed Science Research 12, 131-144.

Bakhsh A, Riaz Malik SH, Aslam M, Iqbal U, Haqqani A. 2007. Response of chickpea genotypes to irrigated and rain-fed conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 9, 590-593.

Bielinski M.S. 2003. Interfernce of Amaranthus hybridus and Portulace oleracea on lentile. Weed Technology 2, 111-115.

Cox JW, Hahn RR, Stachowski PJ, Cherney JH. 2006. Time of weed removal with glyphosate affect corn growth and yield components. Agronomy Journal 98, 349-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0078

Cousens RD, Barnett AG, Barry GC. 2003. Dynamics of competition between wheat and oats. I. Effects of changing the timing of phonological events. Agronomy Journal 95, 1295-1304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1295

Drews S, Neuhoff D, Kopke U. 2009. Weed suppression ability of three winter wheat varieties at different row spacing under organic farming conditions. Weed Research 49, 526–533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00720.x

Hock SM, Kenzeveic SZ, Martin AR. 2006. Soybean row spacing and weed emergence time influence competitiveness and competitive indices. Weed Science 54, 38-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-011R.1

Hunt R. 1990. Basic Growth Anlysis. Unwin-Hyman, London.

Kavurmaci Z, Karadavut U, Kokten K, Bakoglu A. 2010. Determining critical period of weed-crop competion in Faba bean (Vicia faba L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12, 318-320.

Kenzevic SZ, Weise SF, Swanton CJ. 1994. Interference of redroot pig weed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in corn (Zea maize L.). Weed Science 42, 568-573.

El-Desuki, M, Hafez M, Mahmoud A, Abd El-Al F. 2010. Effect of organic and biofertilizer on the plant growth, green pod yield, quality of pea, International Journal of Academic Research 2, 87-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2013

Eslami V, Gill GS, Bellotti B, Mc Donald G. 2006. Wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) interference in wheat. Weed Science 54, 749-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-180R2.1

Lutman PJW, Wright KJ, Berry K, Freeman SE, Tatnell L. 2011. Estimation of seed production by Myositis arvensis, Veronica hederifolia, Veronica persica and viola arvensis under different competitive conditions. Weed Research 51, 499-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00863.x

Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Orchard B. 2001. Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum. Weed Research 41, 197–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2001.00232.x

Mohammadi GR. 2007. Growth parameters enhancing the competitive ability of corn against weed. Weed Biology and Management 7, 232-236.

Namuco OS, Cairns JE, Johnson DE. 2009. Investigating early vigour in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.): part I. Seedling growth and grain yield in competition with weeds. Field Crops Research 113, 197–206.

Olesen JE, Hansen PK, Berntsen J, Chrirensen S. 2004. Simulation of above-ground suppression of competing species and competition tolerance in winter wheat varieties. Field Crops Research 89, 263–280.

Pynenburg GM, Sikkema PH, Gillard CL. 2011. Agronomic and economic assessment of intensive pest management on dry bean. Crop Protection 30, 340-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.12.006

Saito K, Azoma K, Rodenburg L. 2010. Plant characteristics associated with weed competitiveness of rice under upland and lowland conditions in West Africa. Field Crops Research 116, 308–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.01.008

Sikkema PH, Vyn RD, Shropshire C, Soltani N. 2008. Integrated weed management in white bean production. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 88, 555-561.

Swanton CJ, Mahoney KJ, Chandler K, Gulden RH. 2008. Integrated weed management: Knowledge-based weed management systems. Weed Science 56, 168-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-07-126.1

Valentinuz OR, Tolennar M. 2006.  Effect of genotype, nitrogen, plant density, and row spacing on  the  area-per-leaf  profile  in  maize.  Agronomy Journal 98, 94–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0111

Zand E, Beckei HJ. 2002. Competitive ability of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus L.) with wild oat (Avena fatua). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82, 473-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/P01-149


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background