Effective utilization and environmental management of fly ash as a geoliner constituent material

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2015
Views (763)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effective utilization and environmental management of fly ash as a geoliner constituent material

Neha Shreya, Biswajit Paul
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(1), 513-521, January 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Fly ash is a coal combustion byproduct. It is generally light grey in color and consists mostly of silt- and clay-sized glassy spheres. It is regarded as a solid waste material and hazardous to health as it causes many occupational diseases. One of the best methods to minimize the fly ash landfills impact is to utilize it in social and economical manner like in concrete production, due to its pozzolanic and cementitious properties, or by using it in other applications such as a geoliner construction material. The concept of utilizing fly ash as a geoliner firstly needs to optimize and analyze the characteristics of fly ash to be used as a worthy liner material. One of the factors, which need to be study for the formation of geoliner, is the geoliner contamination potential. Since material with potential contaminants cannot be used as liner material. The leaching water through ICP-MS analysis revealed that all the elements detected are below Indian standard of drinking water. Hence Fly ash can be used as a geoliner construction material and an alternative for waste management in India.

Analysis of Coal Fly Ash Thermo Scientific ARL PERFORM’X Series Advanced X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometers. 2012, Application note: 41661, www.thermoscientific.com.

Chand P, Kumar AVA, Gaur A, Mahna SK. 2009. Elemental Analysis of Ash using X-Ray Fluorescence Technique. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 21(10), 220-222.

Daniel DE. 1993. Geotechnical Practice for Waste Disposal. Chapman&Hall, London, UK, 683.

Das BM. 2005. Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering, 2nd edition, Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited, U.S.A.

Dixon DA, Gray MN, Thomas AW. 1985. A study of the compaction properties of potential clay–sand buffer mixtures for use in nuclear fuel waste disposal, Engineering Geology. 21, 247–255.

Hua-lin X, You-gen T, Yu-jie LI, Li-bo LI. 2007. Determination of trace multi-elements in coal fly ash by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Journal of Central South University of Technology. 1, 0068−05.

Komine H. 2004. Simplified evaluation for swelling characteristics of bentonite, Engineering Geology. 71, 265-279.

Maiti SK. 2003. Handbook of methods in Environmental studies, Vol. 2 , Air, Noise, Soil and Overburden analysis, ABD Publishers , Jaipur (India).

MOEF. 2007. Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) Notification, Fly Ash Notification , Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.

Pandian NS. 2004. Fly ash characterization with reference to geotechnical Applications, Journal of Indian Institute of Science. 84, 189–216.

Rao SM, Kachroo TA, Allam MM, Joshi MR, Acharya A. 2008. Geotechnical Characterization of Some Indian Bentonite for their Use as Buffer Material in Geological Repository, 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), 1-6 October, Goa, India.

Sivakugan N. 2000. Soil classification. 1-11.

Sikka and Kansal. Sikka R, Kansal BD. 1995. Effect of fly-ash application on yield and nutrient composition of rice, wheat and on pH and available nutrient status of soil, Bioresource Technology. 51, 199–203.

USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2000. Current drinking water standards, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Washington.

Related Articles

In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Brahime Tingueri*, Souleymane Ouattara, Adjima Ouoba, Romain W. Soalla, Mahamadi Hamed Ouedraogo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 141-149, June 2026.

Impact of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) infesting oil palm

M. Malarvizhi, N. Santhana Bharathi, K. Sujatha*, A. Vijaya Anand, R. Manikandan, J. P. Antony Prabhu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 129-140, June 2026.

Typhoon risk perception and preparedness after Sendong in Bayug Island

Dinah Millendez*, Lex Rei Brendon Hilario, Jay Rey Alovera, Elizabeth Edan Albiento, Melgie Alas, Peter Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 120-128, June 2026.

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.