Effects of in-row spacing on growth and yield of irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties in Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2018
Views (332) Download (197)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effects of in-row spacing on growth and yield of irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties in Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe

Culver Mvumi, Albert Mawoko, Alma Muropa, Albert Tsindi
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.12( 5), 19-26, May 2018.
Certificate: IJAAR 2018 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yields vary widely, usually showing a declining trend, due to differences in in-row spacing used,as well as poor varietal selection for specific locations. This study evaluated the growth and yield responses to different in-row spacings of different varieties of Irish potato grown in Eastern highlands of Zimbabwe. The treatments consisted of three varieties, namely BP1, Diamond and Garnet, and three in-row spacings, namely: 10 cm, 30 cm and 50 cm. Inter-row spacing was maintained at 90cm for all treatments. Treatments were arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD); 3 × 3 factorial arrangement, replicated 3 times. Measurements taken were on plant height, number of potato tubers plant-1, and weight of marketable potato tubers, and then averaged. All in-row spacing were significantly different at P <0.001 with 10 cm producing the highest mean height (92.29 cm). Of the three varieties (Garnet, Diamond and BP1), BP1 produced the greatest height (76.12 cm). There was significant interaction (P=0.001) between variety and in-row spacing on the mean number of tubers plant-1. BP1 produced superior (P < 0.001) mean weight of tubers (15.14 t ha-1) and potato tubers plant-1 (21.47) in comparison to Garnet and Diamond at 10 cm in-row spacing. In conclusion, the study reported the optimum in-row spacing of 10 cm at which, BP1, among the other tested varieties, showed potential to attain the greatest growth and tuber yield when grown under ideal conditions.

VIEWS 30

Allen EJ, Wurr DCE. 1992. Plant density. In the potato crop, Ed. P Harris. London: Chapman and Hall. Pp. 292–333.

Barry PB, Storey TS, Hogan R.2000.Effect of plant population and set size on yield of the main crop potato variety. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research29, 49–60.

Brady NC.2004. The nature and properties of potatoes. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Endale G, Gebremedhin W. 2001. Effects of spatial arrangement on tuber yield of some potato cultivars. African Crop Science Journal 9, 67-76.

Food Agricultural Organization (FAO).2005. FAOSTAT Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Gebre E, Woldegiorgis G. 2001. Effect of spatial arrangement on tuber yield of some potato cultivars, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization. Holetta Research Center. African Crop Science Journal 9(1), 67–76.

Haile W, Boke S.2011. Response of Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum) to the application of potassium at acidic soils of Chencha, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 13, 595–598.

Karafyllidis DI, Georgakis DN, Stavropoulos NI, Nianiou EX, Vezyroglou IA. 1996. Effect of planting density and size of potato seed-minitubers on their yielding capacity. In I Balkan Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes 462,943–950. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.462.150

Karim MR. Hanif MM, Shabidulla SM, Rahman AHMA, Akanda AM, Khair A. 2010. Virus free seed potato production through sprouting cutting technique under net- house. African Journal of Biotechnology 9, 5852–5858.

Khalafalla AM.2001. Effect of plant density and seed size on growth and yield of solanum potato in Khartoum State, Sudan. African Crop Science Journal 9(1),77–82.

Love SL, Thompson-Johns A. 1999. Seed piece spacing influences yield, tuber size distribution, stem and tuber density, and net returns of three processing potato cultivars. HortScience 34(4),629–633.

Lynch DR, Rowberry RG.1977. Population density studies with Russet Burbank II. The effect of fertilization and plant density on growth, development and yield. American Potato Journal 54, 57–71.

Mahmood S. 2005. A study of planting method and spacing on the yield of potato using TPS.Asian Journal of Plant Sciences4, 102–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2005.102.105

Mangani R, Mazarura U, Mtaita TA, Shayanowako A.2015. Growth, yield and quality responses to plant spacing in Irish potato: A review.  African Journal of Agricultural Research10(7), 727–730. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.8557

Masarirambi MT, Mandisodza FC, Mashingaidze AB, Bhebhe E.2012. Influence of plant population and seed tuber size on growth and yield components of potato (Solanum tuberosum). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 14(4),545–549.

Mutubuki P, Katsaruware RD, Svotwa E.2015.Effect of split nitrogen application and fertilizer rate on yield of Irish potatoes (Solanumtuberosum) in a smallholder farming sector of Zimbabwe. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering and Technology (2)1, 112–123.

Nelson DC. 1997. Effects of row spacing and plant populations on yields and tuber size of potatoes. American Potato Journal 44, 17–21.

O’Brien PJ, Allen EJ. 1992. Effects of date of planting, date of harvesting and seed rate on yield of seed potato crops. Journal of Agricultural Science 118(03), 289–300.

Rex BL. 1990. Effects of seed piece population on the yield and processing quality of potato. American Potato Journal 67(8),473–489.

Santos BM, Gilreath JP. 2004. Effect of in-row distance on potato (Solunum tuberosum L.) seed yield and economic feasibility. Gulf coast Education and Research Centre, University of Florida, USA.

Sharma RC, Sud KC. 2001.  Potassium management for yield and quality of potato. Central Potato Research Institute. Pp. 363–381. https://ipipotash.org/udocs/Potassium%20Management%20%20Potato.pdf

Shunka E, Chindi A, W/giorgisG,Seid E, Tessema L. 2016.Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties to nitrogen and potassium fertilizer rates in Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Advances in Crop Science and Technology4, 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000250

Sithole S. 2007. A guide to potato growing.Department of Agricultural, Technical and Extension Services.

Strange PC, Blackmore KW. 1990. Effect of whole seed tubers, cut seed and within row spacing on potato (cv. Sebago) tuber yield. Animal Production Science 30(3),427–431. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9900427

Wurr DCE, Fellows JR, Allen EJ. 1993. An approach to determining optimum tuber planting densities in early potato varieties. The Journal of Agricultural Science 120(1), 63–70.

Zalud Z, Trnka M, Havinka P, Dubrovsky M, Svobodova E, Semeradova D, Bartosova L, Balek J, Eitzinger J, Monzy M. 2011. Climate change impacts on Czech Agriculture, climate change socioeconomic effects. (Accessed 18/07/2013).

ZelalemA, Takalign T, Nigussie D. 2009. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different rate of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on vertisols at DebreBirhan, in the central highlands of Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science3, 16–24.

Zimbabwe Commercial Farmers Union (ZCFU). 2012. Potato production. Longman, Zimbabwe.

Zivenga E, Karavina C.2012. Analysis of factors influencing market channel access by communal horticulture farmers in Chinamora District Zimbabwe. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 4(6), 147–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/JDAE10.070