Effects of salinity on the DNA methylation pattern in barley shoots

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2017
Views (968)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effects of salinity on the DNA methylation pattern in barley shoots

Samira Hamian, Seyyed Abolghasem Mohammadi, Mohammad Moghaddam, Ali Bande Hagh
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 10(1), 60-68, January 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Salinity is a crucial factor which inhibits crop production worldwide. Recent pieces of evidence reveal that epigenetic mechanisms modulate the gene expression in plants undergoing environmental stresses. Obviously, when the epigenetic regulation of plant growth and response to these stresses are truly understood, a novel heritable variation could be developed for crop improvement. The present study attempted to evaluate the DNA methylation alteration made by salt stress in two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars differing in salt tolerance, namely salt-tolerant Sahara3771 and salt-sensitive Clipper. Coupled Restriction Enzyme Digestion-Random Amplification (CRED-RA) was used to detect changes in the methylation pattern of the sequence CCGG in the nuclear genome of the plants growing under salinity stress (100 mM NaCl) and normal conditions. Leaf samples for DNA extraction were harvested 24 hours, 3 weeks, and 5 weeks after salt treatment. The results revealed that the average number of sites showing an increase in the methylation level at the three growth stages with the salt-stress imposition was higher in Sahara3771 (26.21%) than in Clipper (16.32%). Moreover, the number of sites with an increase in methylation under salt stress in Sahara3771 and Clipper, 24 hours and 5 weeks after imposing stress, respectively, was higher than the number of sites at the other stages. These results indicated a significant alteration of DNA methylation in plants as a response to salt stress and the effect was dose-dependent. These changes could provide a mechanism for the adaptation of plants under salt stress.

Bednarek PT, Orlowska R, Koebne RM, Zimny J. 2007. Quantification of the tissue culture induced variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Plant Biology 7, 10-19.

Demirkiran A, Marakli S, Temel A, Gozukirmizi N. 2013. Genetic and epigenetic effects of salinity on in vitro growth of barley. Genetics and Molecular Biology36, 566-570.

Erturk FA, Agar G, Nardemir G, Arslan E, Sigmaz B. 2013. Epigenetic effects of Boron (b) pollution on Zea mays Seedlings. Journal of Selcuk University Natural and Applied Science 2, 757-762.

FAO. 2014. FAO STAT. FAO, Rome. www.faostat.fao.org

Grativol C, Hemerly AS, Ferreira PCG. 2012. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of stress responses in natural plant populations. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1819, 176-185.

Habu Y, Kakutani T, Paszkowski J. 2001. Epigenetic developmental mechanisms in plants: Molecules and targets of plant epigenetic regulation. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 11, 215-220.

Imlay JA. 2003. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 57, 395-418.

Karan R, DeLeon T, Biradar H, Subudhi PK. 2012. Salt stress induced variation in DNA methylation pattern and its influence on gene expression in contrasting rice genotypes. Plos One 7, 1-10.

Ladeiro B. 2012. Saline agriculture in the 21st century: using salt contaminated resources to cope food requirements. Journal of Botany 2012, 1-7.

Mahajan S, Tuteja N. 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 444, 139-158.

McClelland M, Nelson M, Raschke E. 1994. Effect of site-specific modification on restriction endonucleases and DNA modification methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 3640-3659.

Mirouze M, Paszkowski J. 2011. Epigenetic contribution to stress adaptation in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14, 267-274.

Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences81, 8014-8018.

Suzuki MM, Bird A. 2008. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 9, 465-476.

Tsaftaris AS, Polidoros AN. 2000. DNA methylation and plant breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 18, 87-176.

Wang WS, Pan YJ, Zhao XQ, Dwivedi D, Zhu LH, Ali J, Fu BY, Li ZK. 2011. Drought-induced site-specific DNA methylation and its association with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1951-1960.

Wang WX, Vinocur B, Altman A. 2003. A plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218, 1-14.

Weitzman SA, Turk PW, Milkowski DH, Kozlowski K. 1994. Free radical adducts induce alterations in DNA cytosine methylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91, 1261-1264.

Zemach A, McDaniel IE, Silva P, Zilberman D. 2010. Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science 328, 916-919.

Zhang G, Li C. 2010. Genetics and improvement of barley malt quality. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou, 14-20.

Zhong L, Xu YH, Wang JB. 2009. DNA-methylation changes induced by salt stress in wheat Triticum aestivum. African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 6201-6207.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.