Effects of soil type and seed inoculants on germination, seedling vigor and yield of upland rice

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2020
Views (1087)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effects of soil type and seed inoculants on germination, seedling vigor and yield of upland rice

Maribel L Fernandez
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 16(6), 45-51, June 2020.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2020; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the effects of soil type and seed inoculants and the interaction of these soil type and inoculants on germination, seedling vigor and yield of upland rice. It was conducted from November 23, 2016 to March 3, 2017 at Cagayan State University, Lal-lo, Cagayan. There were two factors used in the study. Factor A (Soil Type) T1– Clay, T2– Silty Clay and T3– Silty clay loam, and Factor B (Seed Inoculants) S1– Rhizobia, S2– Mycovam and S3Azospirillum (Bio-N). The Completely Randomized Design in 3×3 factorial was used in the experiment. Based from the result of the study, it was concluded that the soil type affects the seed germination at 14 days after sowing but not at 7 and 21 days after sowing, the soil type 3 (silty clay loam) obtained the longest root length at 7 DAS, the Rhizobia and Mycovam influenced the number of productive tiller, number of filled spikelets, length of panicles and weight of 1000 seeds. Therefore, Rhizobia (S1) and Mycovam (S2) are recommended because it influenced the seedling vigor and seed germination, root length, increased the number of productive tillers, number of filled spikelets, length of panicles and weight of 1000 grains.

Bohlool BB, Ladha JK, Garity DP, George T. 1992. Biological Nitrogen Fixation for Sustainable Agriculture: A Perspective. Plant Soil 141, pp 1-11.

Coaldrake PD, Pearson CJ. 2009. Panicle Differentiation and Spikelet Number Related to Size of Panicle in Rice. Journ. Of Exptl. Bot 36(5), pp 833-840.

Dalla Santa OR, Soccol CR, Ronzelli P, Fernandez R, Michelena G, Dalla Santa HS, Pandey A. 2004. Effects of Inoculants of Azospirillum sp. in Maize Seeds under Field Conditions. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 2, pp 242-238.

Deshpande VK, Kulkarni GN, Kurdikeri MB. 1991. Storability of Maize as Influenced by Time Harvesting. Curr. Res 20, pp 205-207.

Dübbern F, De Souza H, Marcos-Filho J. 2001. The Seed Coat as a Modulator of Seed-Environment Relationships in Fabaceae. Rev. bras. Bot São Paulo Dec 24 (4).

Elias S. 2012. Valuable Seed Vigor Test. Oregon State University Seed Laboratory.

Haberlah D. 2007. “A Call for Australian Loess”. AREA 39 (2), pp 224-229

Hossain M, Fischer KS. 1995. Rice Research for Food Security and Sustainable Development in Asia. Achievements and Future Challenges. Geojournal 35(3), pp 286-298.

Mahesha CR, Channaveeraswami AS, Kurdikeri M, Shekhargouda M, Merwade MN. 2001. Seed Maturation Studies in Sunflower Genotypes. Seed Res. 29(1), pp 95-97.

Mahesha CR, Channaveeraswami AS, Kurdikeri M, Shekhargouda M, Merwade MN. 2001b. Storability of Sunflower Seed Harvested at Different Maturity Dates. Seed Res 29(1), pp 98-102.

Nelson ML. 2004. A Phase Variant of Azospirillum lipoferum lacks a Polar Flagellum and Constitutively Expresses Mechanosensing Lateral Flagela. Appl. Environ. Mircobiol 65, pp 4701-4704.

Singh AR, Lachanna A. 1995. Effect of Dates of Hrvesting, Drying and Storage on Seed Quality of Sorghum Parental Lines. Seed Res 13, pp 180-185.

Steenhoudt, Vanderleyden. 2000. Azospirillum- Plant Relationships: Environmental and Physiological Advances. Can. J. Microbiol 43, pp 103-121.

Wright JS, Smith BJ, Whalley WB. 1998. Mechanisms of Loess-sized Quartz Silt Production and their Relative Effectiveness: Laboratory Simulations. Geomorphology 45, pp 15-23.

Related Articles

Language and culture: Prerequisites for human capital development and enhanced household food security among vulnerable women farmers in Imo State, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu, M. O. Igwenagu, G. U. Amadi, F. D. Anuonye, G. N. Ogbonna, C. F. Obumneke, S. U. Obasi, J. C. Onyeakazi, C. G. Iroagba, N. C. Anigbogu, K. U. Chukwu, C. G. Opara, E. N. Onuoha, N. U. Nzotta, C. R. Ayozie, B. N. Igbokwe, L. O. Duru, O. V. Obiagwu, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 1-16, June 2026.

Ziziphus spina-christi as a bioindicator of heavy metals (Cu, Cd) in Baghdad, Iraq

Israa Radhi Khudhair*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 45-49, May 2026.

Language choice for natural resource conservation and agricultural production information sharing and communication strategies for improved livelihoods among rural farmers in Southeast, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu, C. F. Obumneke, S. U. Obasi, J. C. Onyeakazi, C. G. Iroagba, N. C. Anigbogu, K. U. Chukwu, C. G. Opara, E. N. Onuoha, C. R. Ayozie, B. N. Igbokwe, L. O. Duru, O. V. Obiagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, G. U. Amadi, F. D. Anuonye, G. N. Ogbonna, N. U. Nzotta, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 27-44, May 2026.

Correlates of students’ beliefs on environmental protection: Awareness, compliance, and sociodemographic influences

Anderson G. Gonzales*, Cyrus Kelly Macabangon, Dexter Dumayag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 18-26, May 2026.

Prevalence of phosphate solubilising bacteria in Muthupet Mangrove Reserve

S. Alice Keerthana, V. Shanmugaraju*, M. Poongothai, P. Arun, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 9-17, May 2026.

The bush mango value chain in South West Cameroon: Governance, sustainability and emerging opportunities

Louis Njie Ndumbe*, Agbor Mc Nasare, Baliki Winifred, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 1-8, May 2026.

General characteristics of the mycobiota of vegetable and melon plants cultivated in Azerbaijan

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, E. I. Allahverdiyev, A. G. Eyvazov, S. F. Azadaliyeva, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 139-145, April 2026.

Comparative assessment of plant biomass in the climatic zones of Burkina Faso

Alimata Zorom*, Yélézouomin Stéphane Corentin Somé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 129-138, April 2026.