Evaluating safety and health practices in construction sector for implementation

Paper Details

Research Paper 09/12/2024
Views (870)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluating safety and health practices in construction sector for implementation

Cliven June B. Calunsag
Int. J. Biosci. 25(6), 354-364, December 2024.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2024; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate contractors’ health and safety with regard to their personnel, workspace, and tools. Additionally, it sought to assess adherence to occupational health and safety regulations concerning heavy machinery operations, civil works projects, a health and safety plan, and occupational safety and health training. In order to objectively assess the variable or variables of interest, it combines quantitative research with a self-created questionnaire that forecasts and explains concepts that may be applied to other individuals and places. The questionnaire is chosen, produced, and standardized with validity and reliability in mind. The results showed that respondents only partially followed workplace, work equipment, and people safety and health regulations related to construction. The requirements for occupational health and safety were partially satisfied in the areas of heavy machinery operations, civil works projects, health and safety plans, and occupational safety and health training. Additionally, a portion of the construction safety and health level of compliance was fulfilled. Therefore, it is recommended that construction firms use the updated construction safety model.

British Standards Institution. 2007. OHSAS 18001: Occupational health and safety management systems-Specification. British Standards Institution, London.

Carvajal GI. 2008. Modelo de cuantificación de riesgos laborales en la construcción: RTESCo. (Doctoral Thesis). Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, España.

Enshassi A, Mohamed S, Abushaban S. 2009. Factors affecting the performance of construction projects in the Gaza strip. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15(3), 269–280. DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.269-280.

Geller S. 1994. Ten principles for achieving a total safety culture. Professional Safety 39, 18–24.

Hata B, Szostak M. 2014. Analysis of the development of accident situations in the construction industry. Procedia Engineering 91, 429–434.

International Organization for Standardization. 2008. ISO 9001: Quality management systems-Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

Meliá JL, Mearns K, Silva SA, Lima ML. 2008. Safety climate responses and the perceived risk of accidents in the construction industry. Safety Science 46(6), 949–958.

Molenaar K, Brown H, Caile S, Smith R. 2002. Corporate culture: A study of firms with outstanding construction safety. Professional Safety 47(7), 18–27. Retrieved from https://aeasseincludes.assp.org/professionalsafety/pastissues/047/07/018229xe.pdf.

Nyirenda V, Chinniah Y, Agard B. 2015. Identifying key factors for an occupational health and safety risk estimation tool in small and medium-size enterprises. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48, 541–546.

Sousa V, Almeida N, Dias L. 2014. Risk-based management of occupational safety and health. Safety Science 66, 75–86.

Suárez Sánchez FA, Carvajal Peláez GI, Catalá Alís J. 2017. Occupational safety and health in construction: A review of applications and trends. Industrial Health 55(3), 210–218. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0108. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462637/.

Turner JR. 2009. The handbook of project-based management. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill, London, England, pp. 209–231.

Zhou Z, Goh YM, Li Q. 2015. Overview and analysis of safety management studies in construction. Safety Science 72, 337–350.

Related Articles

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.

Solvents’ influence on polyphenolic compound extractions from Lippia multiflora leaves (Mold, 1949), and their antioxidant activity

Kelemin Awa Koné*, Tagouèlbè Tiho, Mariam Sanogo, Casimir Kekou, Kouassi Hervé Tani, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 109-116, May 2026.

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.

The hidden burden: A review of toxicity from femoral orthopedic implants

Haroon Habib Beigh*, Nabeel Khan, Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 84-96, May 2026.