Evaluating safety and health practices in construction sector for implementation

Paper Details

Research Paper 09/12/2024
Views (747)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluating safety and health practices in construction sector for implementation

Cliven June B. Calunsag
Int. J. Biosci. 25(6), 354-364, December 2024.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2024; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate contractors’ health and safety with regard to their personnel, workspace, and tools. Additionally, it sought to assess adherence to occupational health and safety regulations concerning heavy machinery operations, civil works projects, a health and safety plan, and occupational safety and health training. In order to objectively assess the variable or variables of interest, it combines quantitative research with a self-created questionnaire that forecasts and explains concepts that may be applied to other individuals and places. The questionnaire is chosen, produced, and standardized with validity and reliability in mind. The results showed that respondents only partially followed workplace, work equipment, and people safety and health regulations related to construction. The requirements for occupational health and safety were partially satisfied in the areas of heavy machinery operations, civil works projects, health and safety plans, and occupational safety and health training. Additionally, a portion of the construction safety and health level of compliance was fulfilled. Therefore, it is recommended that construction firms use the updated construction safety model.

British Standards Institution. 2007. OHSAS 18001: Occupational health and safety management systems-Specification. British Standards Institution, London.

Carvajal GI. 2008. Modelo de cuantificación de riesgos laborales en la construcción: RTESCo. (Doctoral Thesis). Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, España.

Enshassi A, Mohamed S, Abushaban S. 2009. Factors affecting the performance of construction projects in the Gaza strip. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15(3), 269–280. DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.269-280.

Geller S. 1994. Ten principles for achieving a total safety culture. Professional Safety 39, 18–24.

Hata B, Szostak M. 2014. Analysis of the development of accident situations in the construction industry. Procedia Engineering 91, 429–434.

International Organization for Standardization. 2008. ISO 9001: Quality management systems-Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

Meliá JL, Mearns K, Silva SA, Lima ML. 2008. Safety climate responses and the perceived risk of accidents in the construction industry. Safety Science 46(6), 949–958.

Molenaar K, Brown H, Caile S, Smith R. 2002. Corporate culture: A study of firms with outstanding construction safety. Professional Safety 47(7), 18–27. Retrieved from https://aeasseincludes.assp.org/professionalsafety/pastissues/047/07/018229xe.pdf.

Nyirenda V, Chinniah Y, Agard B. 2015. Identifying key factors for an occupational health and safety risk estimation tool in small and medium-size enterprises. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48, 541–546.

Sousa V, Almeida N, Dias L. 2014. Risk-based management of occupational safety and health. Safety Science 66, 75–86.

Suárez Sánchez FA, Carvajal Peláez GI, Catalá Alís J. 2017. Occupational safety and health in construction: A review of applications and trends. Industrial Health 55(3), 210–218. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0108. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462637/.

Turner JR. 2009. The handbook of project-based management. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill, London, England, pp. 209–231.

Zhou Z, Goh YM, Li Q. 2015. Overview and analysis of safety management studies in construction. Safety Science 72, 337–350.

Related Articles

Physicochemical and microbiological characterization of flours from the local variety of purple corn (Zea mays L.) produced and marketed in Katiola (Côte d’Ivoire)

Moumouny Traore*, N´Zebo Desiré Kouame, Pepiesin Marie Ange Melem Soro, Zamblé Bi Irié Abel Boli, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 98-106, April 2026.

In the shadows of governance: Exploring youth participation in local peacebuilding initiatives

Juramie R. Rubia, Benny R. Rubia, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 85-97, April 2026.

Evaluation of the agronomic performance, beta-carotene content and dry matter content of 228 sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) genotypes in Burkina Faso

Nattan Gamsore*, Koussao Some, Djakaridja Tiama, Pauline Bationo_Kando, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 73-84, April 2026.

Geomatics tools for agricultural and farm disaster risk management and reduction: A survey of farmers in South-South coastal communities, Nigeria

G. O. Nwodo, O. J. Ugwu, E. U. Onah, A. Ugwuoti, E. Elijah Ebinne*, O. P. Nogheghase, S. I. Ogbaa, U. E. Ahuchaogu, T. O. Ogbuji, C. P. Owuamalam-Chidi, C. O. Osuagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, O. E. Mbakaogu, J. U. Chikaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 59-72, April 2026.

Vegetable production systems in northern Côte d’Ivoire: Constraints, economic performance and integrated soil fertility management challenges

Marie Luce MÂ Semba Ouattara*, Jean Baptiste Gnelié Gnahoua, Kouassi Brahiman Kien, Kouamé Antoine N'Guessan, Yao Casimir Brou, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 41-50, April 2026.

Effect of temperature on the development of immature stages of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae), Coquillett, 1899, A major watermelon pest in Senegal

Madeleine Ivonne Mendy*, Toffène Diome, Mamecor Faye, Mbacké Sembène, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 33-40, April 2026.

Structural characteristics of populations of Vitellaria paradoxa, Parkia biglobosa and Anacardium occidentale in rice-growing areas of the Tioroniaradougou subprefecture (Northern Côte d’Ivoire)

Dofoungo Koné*, Sibirina Soro, Seguena Fofana, Zana Silue, Doudjo Noufou Ouattara, Eboua Narcisse Wandan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 23-32, April 2026.