Evaluating the co-digestion effects on chicken manure and rotten potatoes in batch experiments
Paper Details
Evaluating the co-digestion effects on chicken manure and rotten potatoes in batch experiments
Abstract
Anaerobic co-digestion of various organic substrates has been shown to improve biogas yield and methane percentage yield by maintaining carbon to nitrogen admirable ratio. Two types of substrates have been digested in this study with aim of evaluating influence of co-digestion on biogas and methane yield; the first one was rich in carbon namely rotten potatoes (RP), while the second one was nitrogen rich chicken manure (CM) in mono-digested as well co-digested manner. In present study experimental plan has been designed for RP, CM, M1 (mixture of RP:CM ratio of 50:50) and M2 (mixture of RP:CM ratio of 75:25) digestion at 37ºC. Physicochemical analysis of inoculum and both substrates were evaluated for the determination of theoretical methane production and activity of inoculum. Mono and co-digestion of substrates yielded 291.0, 226.1, 304.5, 341.2 ml/g VS methane for RP, CM, M1 and M2 respectively. While theoretical calculated yields from CHNS values were 309.0, 285.6, 298.7, and 304.5 for RP, CM, M1 and M2 respectively. Percentage of methane in biogas composition increased from 55.53% (CM) to 65.30% methane (M2) of biogas production. Acetate was in maximum proportion with respect to other VFAs in all regular inspection, its range varied from 1044.1, 840, 1098.45 and 1178.9 mg/l for RP, CM, M1 and M2 respectively. The results of co-digestion indicated considerable increase in both biogas and methane production.
Abouelenien F, Fujiwara W, Namba Y, Kosseva M, Nishio N, Nakashimada Y. 2010. Improved methane fermentation of chicken manure via ammonia removal by biogas recycle. Bioresource technology 101, 6368-6373.
Abouelenien F, Nakashimada Y, Nishio N. 2009. Dry mesophilic fermentation of chicken manure for production of methane by repeated batch culture. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering 107, 293-295.
Abouelenien F, Namba Y, Nishio N, Nakashimada Y. 2016. Dry Co-Digestion of Poultry Manure with Agriculture Wastes. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 178, 932-946.
Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L. 2003. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 109, 95.
Apha A. 2005. WEF, 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 21, 258-259.
Borowski S, Domański J, Weatherley L. 2014. Anaerobic co-digestion of swine and poultry manure with municipal sewage sludge. Waste management 34, 513-521.
Bujoczek G, Oleszkiewicz J, Sparling R, Cenkowski S. 2000. High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 76, 51-60.
Buswell A, Mueller H. 1952. Mechanism of methane fermentation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 44, 550-552.
Buyukkamaci N, Filibeli A. 2004. Volatile fatty acid formation in an anaerobic hybrid reactor. Process Biochemistry 39, 1491-1494.
Callaghan F, Wase D, Thayanithy K, Forster C. 2002. Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass and bioenergy 22, 71-77.
Calli B, Mertoglu B, Inanc B, Yenigun O. 2005. Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performances of anaerobic bioreactors. Process Biochemistry 40, 1285-1292.
Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. 2008. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresource technology 99, 4044-4064.
Cysneiros D, Banks CJ, Heaven S, Karatzas K-AG. 2012. The effect of pH control and ‘hydraulic flush’on hydrolysis and Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA) production and profile in anaerobic leach bed reactors digesting a high solids content substrate. Bioresource technology 123, 263-271.
Dalkılıc K, Ugurlu A. 2015. Biogas production from chicken manure at different organic loading rates in a mesophilic-thermopilic two stage anaerobic system. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering 120, 315-322.
De Baere L. 2006. Will anaerobic digestion of solid waste survive in the future? Water Science and Technology 53, 187-194.
De La Rubia M, Raposo F, Rincón B, Borja R. 2009. Evaluation of the hydrolytic–acidogenic step of a two-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion process of sunflower oil cake. Bioresource technology 100, 4133-4138.
Elbeshbishy E, Nakhla G, Hafez H. 2012. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of food waste and primary sludge: Influence of inoculum pre-incubation and inoculum source. Bioresource technology 110, 18-25.
Elefsiniotis P, Wareham D. 2007. Utilization patterns of volatile fatty acids in the denitrification reaction. Enzyme and microbial technology 41, 92-97.
Esposito G, Frunzo L, Liotta F, Panico A, Pirozzi F. 2012a. Bio-methane potential tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. The Open Environmental Engineering Journal 5.
Esposito G, Frunzo L, Panico A, Pirozzi F. 2012b. Enhanced bio-methane production from co-digestion of different organic wastes. Environmental technology 33, 2733-2740.
Font-Palma C. 2012. Characterisation, kinetics and modelling of gasification of poultry manure and litter: An overview. Energy Conversion and Management 53, 92-98.
Gelegenis J, Georgakakis D, Angelidaki I, Mavris V. 2007. Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted poultry manure. Renewable Energy 32, 2147-2160.
Gou C, Yang Z, Huang J, Wang H, Xu H, Wang L. 2014. Effects of temperature and organic loading rate on the performance and microbial community of anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and food waste. Chemosphere 105, 146-151.
Karthikeyan OP, Visvanathan C. 2012. Effect of C/N ratio and ammonia-N accumulation in a pilot-scale thermophilic dry anaerobic digester. Bioresource technology 113, 294-302.
Khalid A, Arshad M, Anjum M, Mahmood T, Dawson L. 2011. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste management 31, 1737-1744.
Lee D-J, Lee S-Y, Bae J-S, Kang J-G, Kim K-H, Rhee S-S, Park J-H, Cho J-S, Chung J, Seo D-C. 2015. Effect of volatile fatty acid concentration on anaerobic degradation rate from field anaerobic digestion facilities treating food waste leachate in South Korea. Journal of Chemistry 2015.
Magbanua BS, Adams TT, Johnston P. 2001. Anaerobic codigestion of hog and poultry waste. Bioresource technology 76, 165-168.
Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, Ren G. 2015. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 45, 540-555.
Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Romero-Güiza M, Fonoll X, Peces M, Astals S. 2014. A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 36, 412-427.
Moral R, Moreno-Caselles J, Perez-Murcia M, Perez-Espinosa A, Rufete B, Paredes C. 2005. Characterisation of the organic matter pool in manures. Bioresource technology 96, 153-158.
Nishio N, Nakashimada Y. 2007. Recent development of anaerobic digestion processes for energy recovery from wastes. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering 103, 105-112.
Poulsen TG, Adelard L. 2016. Improving biogas quality and methane yield via co-digestion of agricultural and urban biomass wastes. Waste management 54, 118-125.
Qiao W, Yan X, Ye J, Sun Y, Wang W, Zhang Z. 2011. Evaluation of biogas production from different biomass wastes with/without hydrothermal pretreatment. Renewable Energy 36, 3313-3318.
Salminen E, Rintala J. 2002. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste–a review. Bioresource technology 83, 13-26.
Shanmugam P, Horan N. 2009. Simple and rapid methods to evaluate methane potential and biomass yield for a range of mixed solid wastes. Bioresource technology 100, 471-474.
Wang X, Gaihe Y, Li F, Ren G, Feng Y. 2012a. Response surface optimization of methane potentials in anaerobic co-digestion of multiple substrates: dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Waste Management & Research, 0734242X12468197.
Wang X, Lu X, Li F, Yang G. 2014. Effects of temperature and carbon-nitrogen (C/N) ratio on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, chicken manure and rice straw: focusing on ammonia inhibition. PloS one 9, e97265.
Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G, Han X. 2012b. Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresource technology 120, 78-83.
Wang XJ, Yang GH, Feng YZ, Ren GX. 2012c. Potential for biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of dairy and chicken manure with corn stalks.Advanced Materials Research 347, 2484-2492.
Wu X, Yao W, Zhu J, Miller C. 2010. Biogas and CH 4 productivity by co-digesting swine manure with three crop residues as an external carbon source. Bioresource technology 101, 4042-4047.
Zhang C, Su H, Baeyens J, Tan T. 2014. Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 38, 383-392.
Zhang R, El-Mashad HM, Hartman K, Wang F, Liu G, Choate C, Gamble P. 2007. Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Bioresource technology 98, 929-935.
Shehbaz Ali, Tawaf Ali Shah, Asifa Afzal, Romana Tabbassum (2017), Evaluating the co-digestion effects on chicken manure and rotten potatoes in batch experiments; IJB, V10, N6, June, P150-159
https://innspub.net/evaluating-the-co-digestion-effects-on-chicken-manure-and-rotten-potatoes-in-batch-experiments/
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0