Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | February 1, 2015

VIEWS 2
| Download 2

Evaluation of alteration zones in choghart iron ore deposit (Bafg Area, Central Iran)

Zohreh Hossein Mirzaei Beni, M. H. Emami, S. J. Sheikhzakariaee, A. Nasr Esfahani

Key Words:


J. Bio. Env. Sci.6(2), 447-454, February 2015

Certification:

JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The Choghart iron ore deposit is located 12 km northeast of Bafq and 125 km southeast of Yazd. The Choghart iron oxide-apatite is placed within felsic volcanic tuffs, rhyolite rocks and volcanic-sedimentary sections belonging to the lower Cambrian period. Sodic alteration is one of the most comprehensive alterations in this mine. The main minerals in this zone are magnetite, hematite, secondary albite (checkers albite), apatite, calcite and amphibole. Other alterations in this deposit are calcic, silica and low temperature alterations. Calcic alteration specified with presence of magnetite and amphibole minerals (major minerals), feldspar and apatite (minor minerals) and hematite. Sodic and calcic alterations are associated with mineralization and silica and low temperature alterations have little relevance with mineralization. Low temperature alterations are the final step of alterations and hematite, martyt, chlorite, epidote, sericite and calcite formed in this stage. There is a limited sulphide phase in Choghart deposit. Pyrite is the most important sulfide phase in all of alterations which can be seen in the scattered shape and with magnetite that represents the next hydrothermal activities. P content is low in all of alterations but its content in sodic alteration is lower than other alterations.

VIEWS 2

Copyright © 2015
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Evaluation of alteration zones in choghart iron ore deposit (Bafg Area, Central Iran)

Barnes HL. 1967. Geochemistry of hydrotermal ore deposit. Holdt, Rinehart and Winston. New York. 670.

Carten BR. 1986. Sodium-Calcium metasomatism: chemical, Temporal, and spatial relationships at the Yerington, Nevada, porphyry copper deposit. Economic Geology. 81, 1795-1519.

Daliran F. 2002. Kiruna-type iron oxide-apatite ores and apatitites of the Bafq district, Iran with an emphasis on the REE geochemistry of their apatites. In: TM Porter (Ed), Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits. A global perspective. PGC Publishing. Adelaide. 377.

Hitzman MW. 2000. Iron oxide-Cu-Au deposits: what, where, when, and why. In: Porter TM (ed) Hydrothermal iron oxide-coppergold and related deposits. a global perspective. 1.

Jami M. 2005. Geology, Geochemistry and Evolution of the Esfordi Phosphate-Iron Deposit, Bafq Area, Central Iran. Doctor of Philosophy thesis. the University of New South Weles. 403.

Moore DE, Liou JG. 1979. Chessboard-twinned albite from Fransiscan metaconglomerates of the Diablo Range, California. American Mineralogist. 64, 329-336.

Torab FM, Lehmann B. 2007. Iron oxide-apatite deposits of the Bafq district, central Iran. an overview from geology to mining. World of Mining – Surface and Underground. 58, 355-362.

Williams P. 2010a. Classifying IOCG deposits. In: Exploring for iron oxide copper–gold deposits: Canada and global analogues. Geol Assoc Canada. Short Course Notes. 20, 11–19.

Williams P. 2010b. Magnetite-Group. IOCGs with special references to Cloncurry and Northern Sweden. settings, alteration,deposit characteristics, fluid sources, and their relationship to apatite-rich iron ores. In: Exploring for iron oxide copper–gold deposits. Canada and global analogues. Geol Assoc Canada. Short Course Notes. 20, 21–36.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background