Evaluation of groundwater modeling
Paper Details
Evaluation of groundwater modeling
Abstract
The study deals with groundwater technique involving flow hydrodynamics and water quality mass transport. Modeling is a very wide term as used and applied in earth sciences, many studies have conceptual models, hydrogeological models, mathematical models, analytical models, numerical models, stochastic models and deterministic models. There are marked differences among these models but also many similarities depending on their use and dimensions of applications. The study treated flow-hydrodynamics and Water quality-mass transport. The study deals with an evaluation of a conceptual model in hydrology which is the pictorial representation of the groundwater flow explained in the form of a block diagram. The observations of the research implication have been that qualitative interpretation of data and information of a site are conceptualized.
Pricket F.A and Lunnquist C J 1971. Selected digital computer technique for groundwater Resource Evaluation Illinois State water survey Bullet 55 p.c.
Tres Cott. 1976. Fint difference models for Aquifer simulation in two Dimensions with result of numerical experiment USGS Technique of water resource Investigations Washington.
Donald M, Harhaugh. 1984 Modular three Dimension Finite Difference groundwater Flow model Virginia.
Wavy HF, Anderson. 1982. introduction to groundwater modeling finite difference and finite elements methods W.H. Free man company San Francisco to California.
Bedient PH, Hubert WC. 1988. Hydrology and flood plain Analysis Anderson – Westley Publishing, Reading, Massachutess.
Heinzer T, Williams D. 2005. Applied Research in Arc objects-based Hydrodynamics Analysis.
Therrien R, Miclaren RG, Sudicky EA, Panday SM. 2004. HydroGeoSphere: A Three-dimensional Numerical Models Describing Fully Integrated Subsurface and Surface flow and solute transport, Manual (Draft), Hydrogeologic Inc, Herndon, VA.
Paul C Njoku, Okoroji L, 2011. Evaluation of groundwater modeling. J. Biodiv. Environ. Sci., 1(6), 174-178.
Copyright © 2011 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.