Evaluation of growth and morphological traits of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars under field conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2014
Views (920)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluation of growth and morphological traits of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars under field conditions

Hadith Kamangar, Asad Rokhzadi, Sadra Hesami
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(2), 53-57, February 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Seven cultivars of strawberry (Paros, Ventana, Queen Elisa, Camarosa, Selva, Mrak and Kurdistan) were evaluated under field conditions. Different growth and morphological parameters and plant yield were studied in this experiment. The greatest amount of plant yield was obtained from Queen Elisa cultivar and the lowest rate of plant yield was recorded by Selva cultivar. Plant yield was significantly correlated with flowers and fruits number, whereas the correlation between plant yield and fruit weight was low and not significant. Furthermore fruit weight was negatively correlated with flowers and fruits number indicating a reverse relationship between the number and the weight of fruits suggesting that strawberry plant yield is a function of fruits number rather than fruit size. In conclusion selection for high yielding strawberries based on high numbers of fruits and flowers can be more effective rather than fruit size or weight.

Acuna-Maldonado LE, Pritts MP. 2008. Carbon and nitrogen reserves in perennial strawberry affect plant  growth  and  yield.  Journal  of  the  American Society for Horticultural Science 133, 735–742.

Anonymous. 2013. Kurdistan agricultural organization. Statistics section. www.kurdistan.agri-jahad.ir

Azzini E, Vitaglione P, Intorre F, Napolitano A, Durazzo A, Foddai MS, Fumagalli A, Catasta G, Rossi L, Venneria E, Raguzzini A, Palomba L, Fogliano V, Maiani G. 2010. Bioavailability of strawberry antioxidants in human subjects. British Journal of Nutrition 104, 1165–1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000711451000187X

Caulet RP, Morariu A, Iurea D, Gradinariu G. 2013. Growth and photosynthetic characteristics of two strawberry cultivars in response to furostanol glycosides treatments. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 41, 231-237.

Da Silva Pinto M, Lajolo FM, Genovese MI. 2007. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of strawberry jams. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 62(3), 127-131. Doi: 10.1007/s11130-007-0052-x

Gawronski J, Hortynski J. 2011. Hierarchic crossing design in estimation genetic control quantitative traits of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 10(1), 77-82.

Hannum SM. 2004. Potential impact of strawberries on human health: a review of the science. Critical Review in Food Science and Nutrition 44, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408690490263756

Morgan KL. 2012. Commodity strawberry profile. From: http://www.agmrc.org/commodities_products/fruits /strawberries/commodity-Strawberry-profile

Ozuygur M, Paydas Kargi S, Kafkas E. 2006. Investigation on yield, fruit quality and plant characteristics of some local, european and american strawberry varieties and their hybrids. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 71(4), 175-180.

Perez AG, Olias R, Espada J, Olias JM, Sanz C. 1997. Rapid determination of sugars, nonvolatile acids, and ascorbic acid in strawberry and other fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45, 3545-3549.

Ukalska J, Madry W, Ukalski K, Masny A, Zurawicz E. 2006. Patterns of variation and correlation among traits in a strawberry germplasm collection (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 14, 5-22.

Related Articles

An investigation of phytochemical constitutents and pharmacological activities of Strobilanthes andamanensis leaf extract

Deepika, V. Ambikapathy, S. Babu, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 86-94, October 2025.

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.