Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | June 1, 2015

VIEWS 1
| Download 2

Evaluation of plant diversity in pure and mixed Plantations of Cupressus arizonica – Iran

E. Amirahmadi, M.R. poormajidian, S.M. Hojjati, A. najjari

Key Words:


J. Bio. Env. Sci.6(6), 76-82, June 2015

Certification:

JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of tree mixture on plant biodiversity in Cupressus arizonica plantations. Plantations are primarily established in order to achieve economic objectives, such as the profitable income derived from the timber production and from other wood products. today, attention to the other services. These services include biodiversity maintenance and natural regeneration. Biodiversity has been shown to play a key role at all levels of the ecosystem service hierarchy. Up to now, few studies about the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning have been done in the mixed and pure plantation and the influence of biodiversity on stability and ecosystem functioning remains less clear. Therefore, in this study, plant biodiversity evaluated in mixed and pure stands to be determined mixture what type of effect on plant biodiversity. The study site was Khargosh Valley Forest Park, located In the vicinity of the metropolis of Tehran province in the Iran country. To analyze the data, the average percentage of coverage gramineous and in this study, the biodiversity, richness and evenness were calculated. The results of this study showed that the abundance and diversity of gramineous species in the understory of mixed plantations of Cupressus arizonica with deciduous hardwood tree were greater than other stands. According to the results obtained from this research, recommended for the establishment of conifer plantation, used mixed cultures of conifers with broadleaf instead of pure cultures conifers.

VIEWS 1

Copyright © 2015
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Evaluation of plant diversity in pure and mixed Plantations of Cupressus arizonica – Iran

Aubin I, Messier C, Bouchard A. 2008. Can plantations develop understory biological and physical attributes of naturally regenerated forests? Biodivers Conserv 8, 2461–2476.

Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P. 2008. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. Forest ecology and management 254(1), 1-15.

Bremer LL, Farley KA. 2010. Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodivers Conserv 19, 3893– 3915.

Carneval NJ, Montagnini F. 2002. Facilitating regeneration of secondary forests with the use of mixed and pure plantations of indigenous tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 163, 217-227.

Chen Y, Cao Y. 2014. Response of tree regeneration and understory plant species diversity to stand density in mature Pinus tabulaeformis plantations in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Engineering 73, 238-245.

Dirzo R, Raven PH. 2003. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28, 137–167.

Duan RY, Wang C, Wang XA, Zhu ZH, Guo H. 2009. Differences in plant species diversity between conifer (Pinus tabulaeformis) plantations and natural forests in middle of the Loess Plateau Russ. Russian journal of ecology 40, 501–509.

Forrester DI. 2014. The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: from pattern to process. Forest Ecology and Management 312, 282-292.

Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Cowie AL, Vanclay JK. 2006. Mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen fixing trees: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 233, 211–230.

Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R, Jonsson M, Gustafsson L, Kjellander P, Ruiz-Jaen MC, Fröberg M, Stendahl J, Philipson CD, Mikusinski G, Andersson E, Westerlund B, Andrén H, Moberg F, Moen J, Bengtsson J. 2013. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature communications 4, 1340.

Gao T, Hedblom M, Emilsson T, Nielsen AB. 2014. The role of forest stand structure as biodiversity indicator. Forest Ecology and Management 330, 82-93.

Guariguata M, Rheingans R,  Montagnini F. 1995. Early woody invasion under tree plantations in Costa Rica: implications for forest restoration. Restoration Ecology 3, 252- 260.

Hojjati SM. 2008. The impact of canopy composition on the nutritional status of an admixed spruce and beech forest at Solling, central Germany. na.

Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological monographs 75, 3-35.

Kelty MJ. 1992. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In: Kelty, M.J., Larson, B.C., Oliver, C.D. (Eds.), The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 125–141 p.

Kelty MJ. 2006. The role of mixtures in plantation forestry. Forest Ecology and Management 233, 195– 204.

Lugo AE. 1997. The apparent paradox of reestablishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures. Forest Ecology and Management 99, 9-19.

Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in ecology and evolution 27, 19–26.

Parrotta JA. 1999. Productivity, nutrient cycling, and succession in single- and mixedspecies plantations of Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus robusta and Leucaena leucocephala in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecology and Management 124, 45-77.

Powers JS, Haggar JP, Fisher RF. 1997. The effect of overstory composition on understory woody regeneration and species richness in seven year old plantation in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management 99, 43- 54.

Stephens SS, Wagner MR. 2007. Forest plantations and biodiversity, a fresh perspective Forest 7, 307–313.

Thelin G, Rosengren U, Callesen I, Ingerslev M. 2002. The nutrient status of Norway spruce in pure and in mixed-species stands. Forest Ecology and Management 160(1), 115-125.

Yirdaw E, Luukkanen O. 2003. Indigenous woody species diversity in Eucalyptus globules plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 567- 582.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background