Evaluation of rapeseed lines for seed yield stability

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2015
Views (222) Download (7)

Evaluation of rapeseed lines for seed yield stability

Md. Alamgir Miah, Md. Golam Rasul, Md. Abdul Khaleque Mian, Md. Motiar Rohman
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.7( 6), 12-19, December 2015.
Certificate: IJAAR 2015 [Generate Certificate]


Stable performance of rapeseed genotypes at a specific growing environment is critical for obtaining high and stable yield. The objectives of this study were to evaluate seed yield stability of sixteen rapeseed genotypes in diverse environments during 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 growing seasons, to graphically make a summary of the effects of genotype (G) and genotype environment (GE) interaction and to identify “which won where” and to recommend rapeseed genotypes for a specific growing environment, using GGE biplot. The GGE biplot was effective in recognition that the genotypes G12, G10 and G6 were the highest yielding and consequently the most desirable genotypes for growing in favourable weather condition. The genotype G5 had the lowest seed yield (5.61 g plant-1) and was the least stable across varying environments. This technique can provide as a useful tool for recommendation of rapeseed genotypes for specific growing environment taking into account the specificities of genotypes and growing conditions.


Balestre M, Souza JC, Pinho RGV, Oliveira RL, Paes JMV. 2009. Yield stability and adaptability of maize hybrids based on GGE biplot analysis characteristics. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 9, 219-228.

Beyene Y, Mugo S, Mutinda C, Tefera T, Karaya H, Ajanga S, Shuma J, Tende R, Kega V. 2011. Genotype by environment interactions and yield stability of stem borer resistant maize hybrids in kenya. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(23), 4752-4758.

Boshev D, Jankulovska M, Ivanovska S, JankuloskI L, KuzManovska B, Tanaskovic, V. 2014. Evaluation of maize hybrids for grain yield stability under rainfed and irrigated conditions using GGE biplot analysis. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 20(6), 1320-1325.

Butron A, Velasco P, Ordás A, Malvar RA. 2004. Yield evaluation of maize cultivars across environments with different levels of pink stem borer infestation. Crop Science 44, 741-747.

Dehghani H, Ebadi A, Yousefi A. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agronony Journal 98, 388-393.

Dehghani  H,  Sabaghnia  N,  Moghaddam  M. 2009. Interpretation of genotype-by-environment interaction for late maize hybrids’ grain yield using a biplot method. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 33(2), 139-148.

Fan XM, Kang MS, Chen H, Zhang Y, Tan J, Xu C. 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agronomy Journal 99, 220-228.

FAO  (Food  and  Agriculture  Organization  of  the United Nations). 2015. FAOSTAT. Retrieved August 26, 2015 from http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E.

Ilker E, Aykut Tonk F, Caylak O, Tosun M, Ozmen I. 2009. Assessment of genotype × environment interactions for grain yield in maize hybrids using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 14(2), 123-135.

Kang MS. 1998. Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Advances in agronomy 62, 200-252.

Khalil IA, Rahman H, Rehman NU, Arif M, Khalil IH, Iqbal M, Ullah H, Afridi K, Sajjad M, Ishaq M. 2011. Evaluation of maize hybrids for grain yield stability in North West of Pakistan. Sarhad Journal Agriculture 27(2), 213-218.

Mortazavian SMM, Nikkhah HR, Hassani FA, Sharif-al-Hosseini M, Taheri M, Mahlooji M. 2014. GGE Biplot and AMMI analysis of yield performance of barley genotypes across different environments in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 16, 609-622.

MPOC. (Malaysian Palm Oil Council Bangladesh). 2015. Annual Import of Palm Oil Exceeds 1 Million Tonnes Again. Retrieved August 26, 2015 from http://mpoc.org.bd/?p=1106.

Nzuve F, Githiri S, Mukunya DM, Gethi J. 2013. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for grain yield in maize hybrids. Journal of Agricultural Science. 5(11), 75- 85.

Oliveira RL, Garcia R, Von Pinho, Balestre M, Ferreira DV. 2010. Evaluation of maize hybrids and environmental stratification by the methods AMMI and GGE biplot. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 10, 247-253.

PBTools, version 1.4. 2014. Biometrics and Breeding Informatics, PBGB Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna.

Raj L, Singh VP, Kumar P, Berwal KK. 1997. Stability analysis for reproductive traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus subsp. Oleifera), Indian mustard (B. juncea) and gobhi sarson (B. napus subsp. Oleifera var.annua). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 67(4), 168-170.

Sabaghnia DNH, Sabaghpour SH. 2008. Graphic analysis of genotype × environment interaction of lentil yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal 100, 760-764.

Samonte SOPB, Wilson LT, McClung AM, Medley JC. 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis. Crop Science 45, 2414-2424.

Tonk FA, Ilker E, Tosun M. 2011. Evaluation of genotype × environment interactions in maize hybrids using GGE biplot analysis. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 11, 1-9.

Yan W, Kang MS. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Yan W, Rajcan I. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in ontario. Crop Science 42, 11-20.

Yan W. 2001. GGE biplot-A windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal 93, 1111- 1118.

Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40, 597-605.

Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science 47, 643-655.