Evaluation of variety and plant density on grain yield, number of seed per cob and 100 grain weight in maize (Zea mays L.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2014
Views (543)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluation of variety and plant density on grain yield, number of seed per cob and 100 grain weight in maize (Zea mays L.)

Farhad Hassanpour, Hamid Reza Mobasser, Hamid Reza Ganjali
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(1), 539-543, July 2014.
Keywords: Density, Maize, Variety
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Maize is ranked third among cereal crops after wheat and rice. Maize is used as staple food. Maize is also used as feed for livestock. Planting density plays an important role in achieving high productivity per unit area. Plant density is invariably linked with yield, the more plant stands there are up to a certain limit, the higher the expected yield. The experiment was conducted at the Research Station in sohrabad khash. The field experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with factorial design with three replications. Treatments included variety (v1: s.c 704, v2: s.c 540, v3:sc 301) and plant density consisted of D1: 6.5 plant/m2, D2: 7.5 plant/m2, D3: 8.5 plant/m2 and D4: 9.5 plant/m2. Analysis of variance showed that the effect of variety on characteristics was significant.

Agarwal PK, Jha B. 2010. Transcription factors in plants and ABA dependent and independent abiotic stress signaling. Biologia Plantarum 54, 201-212.

Ahmad R, Mahmood I, Kamal J, Bukhari SA. 2004. Growth and yield response of three mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) cultivars to varying seeding rates. Int. J. Agric. Bio 3, 538–550.

Alexander D. 10604 The L’Aquila Earthquake of 1 April 2009 and Italian Government Policy on Disaster Response. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 2(4), 325-342.

Baker EI. 1975. Effects and interaction of package deal inputs on yield and labour demand of maize. Experimental Agriculture 11, 195-304.

Bertoia L, Burak R, Nivio A. 1998. Effect of plant densities on yield and quality of forage maize. Maize Growers Co-operative Newsletter. Santa Catarina, Brazil 17, 110- 132.

Dare AP, Schaffer RJ, Wang KL, Allan AC, Hellens RP. 2008. Identification of a cis-regulatory element by transient analysis of co-ordinately regulated genes. Plant Methods 4(17), 1-10.

Diepenbrock W. 2000. Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Field Crops Res 67, 35–49.

Gustavo AM, Alfredo GC, Otegui ME. 2006. Row width and maize grain yield. Agron. J 98, 1532-1543

Hara T. 1984. Dynamics of stand structure in plant monocultures. J. Theor. Biol 110, 223–239.

Legard DE, Xiao CL, Mertely JC, Chandler CK. 2000. Effects of plant spacing and cultivar on incidence of botrytis fruit rot in annual strawberry. University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Lewis Gallagher Road, Dover 84, 531-538.

Lone BA, Khan MH. 2010. Effect of seed rate, row spacing and fertility levels on relative economics of soybean (Glycine max L.) under temperate conditions. Afric. J. Agric. Res 5, 322-324.

Nasir M. 2000. The effects of different plant population on yield and yield components of different maize varieties. M. Sc. (Hons) Thesis, Dept. of Agron. KPK Agric. Univ, Peshawar, Pakistan 12, 85- 100.

Petersen VO. 1998. Influence of raised beds, plant density, and fertigation on yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × Ananassa Duch.). Europ. J. Hort. Sci 63(1), 19-22.

Priest HD, Filichkin SA, Mockler TC. 2009. cis-Regulatory elements in plant cell signaling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12, 643–649.

Songai L. 2001. Understanding plant density effects on maize growth and development: An important issue to maximize grain yield. Cienc. Rural 31, 159-168.

Trenton F, Stanger S, Joseph GL. 2006. Optimum plant population of Bacillus thuringiensis and non-Bacillus thuringiensis corn in Wisconsin. Agron. J 98, 914-921.

Won SK, Lee YJ, Heo YK, Cho M, Chocis HT. 2009. Element and Transcriptome Based Screening of Root Hair-Specific Genes and Their Functional Characterization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 150, 1459–1473.

Related Articles

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.

Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale and Ehrlichia ruminantium in wild grasscutter’ specific ticks in southern Côte d’Ivoire

Zahouli Faustin Zouh Bi, Alassane Toure, Yatanan Casimir Ble, Yahaya Karamoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 21-27, October 2025.