Experimental investigation on the anaerobic digestibility of selected vegetable wastes for biogas production

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2019
Views (847)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Experimental investigation on the anaerobic digestibility of selected vegetable wastes for biogas production

Antonio-Abdu Sami M. Magomnang, Nessan Joe V. Ipulan
Int. J. Biosci. 14(2), 81-90, February 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Due to the inefficient transportation and inability to preserve those agricultural products can be rotten and wasted. As a solution, to determine the viability of the selected vegetable wastes co-digested with cow and pig manure as a feedstock to produced biogas. The experiment conducted in a batch-type anaerobic co-digestion process under the mesophilic condition for 30 days of digestion. Agricultural products such as cabbage, Chinese cabbage, and lettuce are mixed with cow and pig manure subject to different particle sizes of 2.00 mm, 4.00 mm and 6.35 mm. Based on the experiments, it was observed that the temperature of the digester over the 30 days digestion period was 28 – 31 oC. Moreover, the effect of smaller particle size shows the highest biogas volume production of 1733.70 ml than the other particle sizes. In addition, the carbon dioxide concentration recorded as 14 – 16%, as well as the hydrogen sulfide concentration of 6 – 18 ppm. Furthermore, the effect sodium hydroxide buffer solution improves the pH concentration of the substrate but it does not reach the required pH values for methane formation which is 7.0; and other vegetable wastes such as lettuce, cabbage resulted in the failure of biogas production due to ammonia inhibition that affects the methane production process. Thus, the biogas production from these wastes can be used as an energy source for cooking, heating, and power generation applications.

Anti H. 2012. Addition of Esters on Anaerobic Digestion: Inhibiting or Boosting Biogas Production”Master’s Thesis. Chalmers University of Technology,  Goteborg, Sweden.

Anunputtikul W, Rodtong S. 2004. Investigation of the potential production of biogas from cassava tuber. In Proceedings to the 15th Annual Meeting of the Thai Society for Biotechnology and JSPS-NRCT Symposium, p 70.

Aslanzadeh S, Özmen P. 2009. Biogas production from municipal waste mixed with different portions of orange peel. Master’s Thesis, University of Borås.

Deublein D, Steinhauser A. 2011. Biogas from waste and renewable resources: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons.

Esposito G, Frunzo L, Liotta F, Panico A, Pirozzi F. 2012. Bio-methane potential tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. The Open Environmental Engineering Journal 5(1), p 1-8.

Moset V, Poulsen M, Wahid R, Højberg O, Møller HB. 2015. Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology. Microbial biotechnology 8(5), p 787-800.

Muyiiya ND, Kasisira LL. 2009. Assessment of the Effect of Mixing Pig and Cow Dung on Biogas Yield. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal 11, p 1-7.

Tenagne GF. 2016.Production of biogas from onion (Allium cepa L.) peels co-digested with cow dung. Dissertation, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Sebola MR, Tesfagiorgis HB, Muzenda E. 2015. Methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung, chicken manure, pig manure and sewage waste. In Proceedings World Congress Engineering, p 1-3.

Sreekrishnan TR, Kohli S, Rana V. 2004. Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques: a review. Bioresource Technology, p 95(1), 1-10.

Related Articles

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.

Linkages between land use change, flooding, and water quality in the Pallikaranai Marshland, Chennai, India

Arunpandiyan Murugesan, Roshy Ann Mathews, Aarthi Mariappan, J. Ranjansri, Rajakumar Sundaram, Prashanthi Devi Marimuthu*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 28-37, February 2026.

Nutritional and phytochemical characteristics of Garcinia afzelii fruit

Doumbia Fanta*, Dje Kouakou Martin, Kone Daouda, Silue Sana Etienne, Kouame Lucien Patrice , Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 17-27, February 2026.

Sensory evaluation of horn snail (Telescopium telescopium) patty

Ma. Isabel P. Lanzaderas, Gilbert P. Panimdim, Proceso C. Valleser Jr.*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 7-16, February 2026.

Two years evolution of deltamethrin, malathion and pirimiphos-methyl resistance in Aedes aegypti from urban in peri urban sites of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Hyacinthe K. Toe*, Moussa W. Guelbeogo, Soumananaba Zongo, Aboubacar Sombie, Athanase Badolo, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 1-6, February 2026.

Physicochemical characterization of annatto seeds (Bixa orellana) sold in Ouagadougou and their oils extracted using chemical processes

Mah Alima Esther Traoré*, Adama Lodoun, Pingdwindé Marie Judith Samadoulougou-Kafando, Nestor Beker Dembélé, Kiswendsida Sandrine Léticia Dayamba, Charles Parkouda, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 169-178, January 2026.