Factors influencing on forests development viewpoint of experts natural resource in Iran

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2015
Views (205) Download (10)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Factors influencing on forests development viewpoint of experts natural resource in Iran

Gholamreza Dinpanah, Sepideh Gholizadeh
J. Bio. Env. Sci.6( 2), 343-349, February 2015.
Certificate: JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine effect of factors on forests development in Iran. The research population consisted of 471 experts in natural resources organization, which were selected using sampling method (n=220). The methodological approach of this study was descriptive-correlative. Validity of the instrument was established by a panel of experts consisting of senior faculty members and research committee advisors. Reliability analysis was conducted by using Cronbach alpha formula and result was 0.95. The results showed that 33.6, 41.4 and 25 percent of experts expressed that situation of forests development in Iran were weak, moderate and good respectively. Also the results of the multiple regression analysis (stepwise method) revealed that educational and management factors explained a variation of 16.1 percent of forests development.

VIEWS 8

Agarwa B. 2009. Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women’s participation in community forest governance, Ecological Economics 68(11), 2785–2799.

Amirnejad H. 2005. The Total Economic Value Determination of North Forests Ecosystem of Iran with the Emphasis on Valuation of Environmental-Ecological and Preservation Values, PHD Thsis, Tarbiat Modares University, 273 p.

Anonymous. 2011. The forests of northern Iran, based on the latest available quarterly. Journal of forest and grassland, 53, 16-10.

Arayesh B, Mammi Sh. 2010. Prioritization role of psychological factors in the process of popular participation groups to preserve, revival, develop and using natural resources. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 174-177.

Azuma DL, Eskelson BNI, Thompson JL. 2014. Effects of rural residential development on forest communities in Oregon and Washington, USA, Forest Ecology and Management, 330, 183–191

Bozorgmanesh M, Bashirzadeh E. 2011. Extension-Education Activities in protection of forests. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological sciences, 1(8), 243-245.

Heidarpour Z, Shaban Fami H, Asadi A, Maleki I. 2010. Membership in cooperatives of forest exploitation of forest resources in West province. 20(210), 91-115.

Kook HM, Dong KP. 2004. The role and activities of NGOs in reforestation in the northeast Asian region, Journal of forest Ecology and management, 20(1), 75-81.

Lehtonen O, Tykkyläinen M. 2014. Delphi path simulator for unveiling development opportunities in the forest industries by contrasting forest management practices — the case of North Karelia, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 84, 171–185.

MalekMohammadi I, Mirbod M. 2005. The role of environmental organization in natural resources management extension (case study in Iran). Ameri can Journal of Environmental sciences, 1(3), 221-229.

Mirdamadi M, Salehi F. 2004. Examine the role of NGOs in protecting and restoring forests and grasslands province, Journal of forest and grassland, 65, 63-56.

Mirzaei J, Tabari M, Daroodi H. 2007. Early growth of Quercus castanie folia seedlings as affected by weedings, shading and irrigation. Pakistan Journal of Biological sciences, 10(15), 2430-2435.

Noubakht A. 2010, Preservation, restoration, development and proper utilization of natural resources, Sabzine, 52, 33-40.

Salam MA, Naguchi T. 2006. Evaluating capacity development for participatory forest management in Bangladesh’s Sal forests based on d4RsT stakeholder analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(8), 785– 796.

Salehi Shanjani P. 2005. Approach to the conservation of forest genetic resources of the North, Journal of forest and grassland, 68, 6-8.

Sugimura K, Howard TE. 2008. Incorporating social factors to improve the Japanese forest zoning process. Forest Policy and Economics. 10(3), 161-173.