Fertilization strategies on Mulberry (Morus alba L. var. Alfonso) plants under sweet potato-based agroforestry system

Paper Details

Research Paper 10/11/2022
Views (1778)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Fertilization strategies on Mulberry (Morus alba L. var. Alfonso) plants under sweet potato-based agroforestry system

Marjohn V. Anislag, Lilito D. Gavina
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 21(5), 24-34, November 2022.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2022; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the growth yield performance per plant of mulberry (M. alba L. var. Alfonso) in terms of fresh weight biomass yield (g), number of shoots, weight of shoots, length of the longest shoot (cm), diameter of the longest shoot (mm), number of leaves and weight of leaves as influenced by fertilization strategies intercropped with sweet potato (Ipomea batatas L.) varieties. Results of the study revealed that the plants applied with RR 100% Chicken Compost, RR 100% Urea & RR 50% Chicken Compost + RR 50% Urea were comparable with each other and significantly favored on the fresh weight biomass yield (g), number of shoots, weight of shoots (g), length of the longest shoot (cm), diameter of the longest shoot (mm), number of leaves and weight of leaves (g) per mulberry (M. alba var. Alfonso) plant intercropped with sweet potato varieties over the plants with no fertilizer application. Consequently, the fertilization strategies prominently favored on the growth yield performance of mulberry (M. alba var. Alfonso) plant. This intercropping scheme as agroforestry practice provides additional income, increase carbon stocks in soil and woody biomass and maintain the most soil fertility properties. It further contributes to climate change mitigation through reforestation and carbon sequestration. The use of RR 100% Chicken Compost, RR 100% Urea and RR 50% Chicken Compost + RR 50% Urea is recommended to mulberry (M. alba var. Alfonso) tree plantations intercropped with high value agricultural crops like sweet potato.

Abidin PE, Carey E, Mallubhotla S, Sones K. 2017. Sweet potato Cropping Guide. Retrieved On February 02, 2019.

Adeyeye AS, Akanbi WB, Sobola OO, Lamidi WA, Olalekan KK. 2016. Comparative Effect of Organic and In-Organic Fertilizer Treatment on the Growth and Tuberyeild of Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas L).

Apilado L, Dela Cruz S, Caccam M. 2019. Sericulture Research and Development Institute of Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University NLUC Compound.

Dai X, Pu L, Rao F. 2017. Assessing the Effect of A Crop-Tree Intercropping Program On Smallholders’ Incomes In Rural Xinjiang, China.

Delmo G. 2018. Sweet potato Coming of Age. Far Eastern Agriculture.

Ghosh A, Gangopadhyay DB, Chowdhury T. 2017. Economic and Environmental Importance Of Mulberry: A Review.

Helen Keller International Tanzania. 2012. Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Situation Analysis And Needs Assessment Tanzania Report. Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania 37pp.

Islam MN, Akhteruzzaman M, Alom MS, Salim M. 2014. Hybrid Maize and Sweet Potato Intercropping: A Technology to Increase Productivity and Profitability for Poor Hill Farmers in Bangladesh.

Mousavi SR, Eskandari H. 2011. A General Overview on Intercropping and Its Advantages in Sustainable Agriculture.

Nedunchezhiyan M, Jata SK, Byju G. 2012. Sweet Potato – Based Cropping Systems.

Otanes MJ, Picazo MO. 2018. Republic of the Philippines Province of La Union Office of the Provincial Agriculturist.

Ozturk G, Nil F, Zihin A. 2012. “Field Performance Of In Vitro Sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] Plantlets Derived From Seedstocks.” Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 17, 1-4. Ravi, V., S.K. Naskar, T. Makeshkumar, B. Babu and B.S.P. Krishnan.

Philippine Statistics Authority. 2014. 2014 Cost and Returns of Sweet Potato (Camote) Production.

Rajegowda BS, Vinutha C. Vanitha and Sanath Kumar VB. 2020. Effect of Growing Intercrops on Growth and Yield of Tree Mulberry Inturn its Influence on Cocoon Yield. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 9(05), 3134-3139. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.905.371

Serenje GI, Mwala SM. 2010. Variation in Micronutrient Content of OrangefleshedSweetpotato Varieties Grown in Different Environments. In: Proceedings of the Second Ruforum Biennial Regional Conference on Building Capacity for Food Security in Africa, Entebbe, Uganda, September 20-24, E. Adipala.

Shinde KS, Avhad SB, Jamdar SV, Hiware CJ. 2012. Hiware. Impact of Spacing, Fertilizer on the Productivity of Mulberry (Morus alba L.) V1 Variety.

Sobola OO, Amadi DC, Jamala GY. 2015. The Role of Agroforestry in Environmental Sustainability.

Villamor CC. 2008. Morphological Characterization and Nutritional Bioassay of Different Mulberry (Morus alba L.) Varieties with Silkworm (Bombyx mori L.).

Virchow D. 2013. Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture: A Pillar of improved Nutrition and Better Health. Food Security Center, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany pp. 692-748.

Yeng SB, Agyarko K, Dapaah HK, Abomako WJ, Asare E. 2012. Growth and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) as influenced by integrated application of chicken manure and inorganic fertilizer.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.