Genetic parameters resistance of several genotypes and f1 crossing results of papaya plant (Carica papaya L.) on mealybug pest (Paracoccus marginatus) with no choice test method

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2018
Views (654)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Genetic parameters resistance of several genotypes and f1 crossing results of papaya plant (Carica papaya L.) on mealybug pest (Paracoccus marginatus) with no choice test method

Fitri Wahyuni, Siti Hafsah, Sapdi
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 13(1), 39-45, July 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The efforts to obtain genetic information and resilience of several papaya genotypes, so the resistant genotypes are selected.This study aims to obtain information on the genetic parameters and best resistance level of papaya plants against the mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) using no choice test method.  The research was conducted in Cot Cut Village, Aceh Besar District, Pest Laboratory and Weed Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Syiah Kuala from September 2017 to January 2018 and used Completely Randomized Design (CRD) non-factorial pattern with plant genotype as treatment. Each genotype was repeated 3 times with 5 samples per repetition. Papaya seedlings used were 11 genotypes, 7 genotypes of which were from previous crosses from 4 elders: Dapina (USK7), Carisya (USK1), Calina (USK4) and Carmida (USK6). The results showed the lowest intensity of attack was in USK1 genotype of 37.65% and the lowest number of ovisac was found at USK7 with value 7.18. High heritability values are found in plant height, length of petiole and dry weight. There is a significant correlation on all plant growth characters with the intensity of the attack with the highest value on the leaf area index character with the intensity of the attack with a very real value of -0.73. There were no genotypes with the resistant category, but genotypes were found with rather resistant categories that could be considered for selection.

A’yun Q. 2015. Seleksi ketahanan jalur dan varietas kedelai (Glycine max L. Merrill) Berdasar kankarakter morfologi polong sebagai pengen dalihama pengisappolong (Riptortus linearis F.). Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang.

Badan PusatStatistik Provinsi Aceh. 2016. Produksi tanaman buah-buahan menurut jenis/kabupaten. Retrieved April 27, 2015. https://aceh.bps.go.id.

Baliadi Y. 2008. Keanekaragaman hama, penyakit, dan musuh alaminya pada tanaman kacang-kacangan di Jawa Timur, Bali, dan Lombok. Laporan Hasil Penelitian. Balai Penelitian Tanaman Kacang-kacangan. dan Umbi-umbian, Malang. 18 page.

Budiyanti T, Sunyoto. 2014.  Pendugaan heritabilitas dari 15 genoti pepapaya (Carica papaya L.) pada dua periode musim panen. Journal of Agroteknology. 2, 11-14.

Falconer DS.1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Third edition. English Language Book Society Longman. Hongkong.438 page.

HapsariRT, Adie M. 2010.Pendugaan parameter genetic dan hubungan antar komponen hasil kedelai. Balitkabi. Malang. Journal of griculture Food Crops. 29, 18-23.

Ivakdalam.2010.Dampak Ekonomi Serangan Hama Asing Invansif Paracoccus marginatus (Hemimptera: Pseudococcidae) pada Usahatani. Nurhayatidan Anwar: Prevalensi Cendawan Neozygites Papaya di Kabupaten Bogor. Thesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Jameela H, SugihartoAN, Soegianto A. 2014. Keragaman Genetik Dan Heritabilitas Karakter Komponen hasil Padapopulasi f2 Buncis (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) Hasil persilangan varietas introduksi dengan varietas lokal. Journal of Plant Production.2, 324-329.

Krishnan JU, George M, Ajesh G, Jithine JR, Lekshmi NR, Deepasree ME. 2016. A review on Paracoccus marginatus williams, papaya mealy bug (Hemiptera :Pseudococcidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies.4, 528-533.

Kumar A, Prasad Y, Chaudhary P, Kumar N. 2018.studies on genetic variability, character association and path analysis among yield and yield contributing traits in papaya (Carica papaya L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 1, 845-849.

Lolong R. 2014. Padat Populasi Dan Persentase Serangan Paracoccus marginatus William and Granara de willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) pada pertanaman papaya monokultur dan polikultur di kecamatan dimembe kabupaten minahasa utara. Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado.

Martono B.2009. Keragaman Genetik, Heritabilitas, dan Korelasiantar Karakter Kuantitatif Nilam (Pogostemon sp.) Hasil Fusi Protoplas. Journal of Littri. 15, 9-15.

Nasir M. 2013. Pengantar Pemuliaan Tanaman. Penerbit CV Darmadana Multiguna. Banda Aceh. 354 page.

Natawigena.1989. Pestisidadan Kegunaannya. Penerbit CV Armico. Bandung. 71 page.

Pramayudi N, Hartati O. 2012. Biologi Hama Kutu Putih Pepaya (Paracoccus marginatus) pada tanaman pepaya. Journal of Floratek. 7, 32-44.

Rauf A. 2008. Hama Kutu Putih (Paracoccus marginatus). Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Hama Tanaman. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Sujiprihati S. 2009. Budidaya Pepaya Unggul. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Stanfield WD. 1991.Genetics (diterjemahkan oleh Apandi Hardi LT). Edisikedua. Erlangga. Jakarta.

Tairas W, Tulung M, Pelealu, Rondonuwu SJ. 2014. Study on Population Abundance of Papaya Mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams & Granara de Willink) in the North Minahasa Regency of North Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research.5, ISSN 2229-5518.

Tombing Y,Muhardi, Ariembawa D. 2010. Pertumbuhan Beberapa Varietas Pepaya (Carica papaya L.) pada berbagai jenis pupuk. Journal Agroland. 17, 149 – 153.

Wahyuni F. 2016. kerajaan beberapa genotip pepaya (Carica papaya L.) dan pendugaan parameter genetik ketahanan terhadap hama kutu putih (Paracoccus marginatus) di pembibitan. Skripsi. Agroteknologi, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh.

Related Articles

Botanical-based strategies for sustainable whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) management and tomato leaf curl virus suppression

P. G. Maina, R. K. Birithia, G. N. Kamotho, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(2), 1-11, August 2025.

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.