Genetic variability in different maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for comparative yield performance under local conditions of Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2017
Views (875)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Genetic variability in different maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for comparative yield performance under local conditions of Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir

Bazeer Khan, Nausherwan Nobel Nawab, Maqsood Qamar, Mudassar Abbas, Muhammad Haroon, Anisa Intikhab, Hussain Ahmed, Israr Ahmed, Kinza Khan, Maleeha Afreen
Int. J. Biosci. 11(3), 102-107, September 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The investigational material consisted of fourteen genotypes of maize collected from Crop Science Institute, National Agriculture Research Center Islamabad. The study was conducted to investigate the genetic variability in different maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes for grain yield performance under local conditions of Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The data was collected for some morpho-physiological traits like days to tasselling, days to silking, number of leaves plant-1, number of cobs plant-1, tassel branching, plant height (cm), ear height (cm), ear length (cm), ear girth (cm), number of kernel rows ear-1, number of kernels row-1, 100-grain weight (g) and grain yield (kg ha-1).  Statistically significant differences were found among all the maize genotypes for the characters under observation. Azam showed maximum number of cobs/plant, 100-grain weight, ear girth, kernel rows/ear and maximum grain yield. Genotype E-77 was a high yielding variety followed by Habib-1, Islamabad Gold and Margalla. These genotypes could be exploited in further breeding activities for the development of high yielding lines.

Anonymous, Government of Pakistan. 2013. Finance Division, Economic Advisory Wing, Islamabad, Pakistan, 17-34 p.

Aziz A, Saleem M, Rehman H, Muhammad F. 1992. Performance maize hybrids under irrigated condition. Sarhad J. Agric. 8(5), 509-512.

Bello OB, Abdulmaliq SY, Afolabi MS, Ige SA. 2010. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and agro-nomic characters among open pollinated maize varieties and their F1 hybrids in a diallel cross. Afr. J. Biotech., 9(18), 2633-2639.

FAO. 2013. Cereal Supply and Demand Brief. www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/wfshome/csdb/en.

Hussain N, Hayat K, Zubair M, Aziz A, Zaman Q. 2005. Adoptability of maize varieties to D. I. Khan ecology. Indus J. Plant Sci., 4(2),191-195.

Hussain N, Khan MY, Baloch MS. 2011. Screening of maize varieties for grain yield at Dera Ismail Khan. J. An. & Plant Sci., 21(3), 626-628.

Ihsan H, Khalil IH, Rehman H, Iqbal M. 2005. Genotypic variability for morphological and reproductive traits among exotic maize hybrids. Sarhad J. Agric., 21(4), 599-602.

Kafeel A, Rahman H, Ali W, Hussain N. 2004. Performance fo maize hybrids for yield and yield components. Sarhad J. Agric., 20(3), 405-408.

Mehdi SS, Ahsan M. 2001. Comparative evaluation of newly developed maize population for fodder purposes. J. Biol.Sci., 1(1),7-8.

Munawar M, Shahbaz M., Hammad G, Yasir M.2013.Correlation and path analysis of grain yield components in exotic maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids. Int. J. of Sci. Bas.& App. Res.,12(1),22-27.

Nizam-ud-din, Qasim M, Hussain M.2010. Comparative study of agronomic parameters in synthetic maize varieties. J. Agric. Res., 48(1),53-57.

Sanker GR, ReddyPR. 2005. Identification of maize genotypes for rainfed condition based on modeling of plant traits. Indian J. Genet., 65(2),88-92.

Shahwani MN, Salarzi A, Bangulzai BA, Shahwain MA, Megal NM. 2001. Hybrid vigor for grain yield and its components in maize crosses. Sarhad J. Agric., 17,571-576.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics. A briometrical approach. 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, USA.

Tahir M, Tanveer A, Ali A, Abbas M, Wasaya A. 2008. Comparative yield performance of different maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under local conditions of Faisalabad-Pakistan. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci., 6(2), 118-120.

Ullah I, KhalilH, UllahH, KhanJ. 2005. Comparative performance of F1 maize hybrids across seasons. Sarhad J. Agric., 21 (3),395-402.

Yadav VK,  Singh IS. 2010.Comparative evaluation of maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.) according to dus testing using morphological, physiological and molecular markers. Agric. Sci., 1(3),131-142.

Related Articles

Sensory characteristics of muscovado enhanced with varying levels of turmeric

Johny P. Alvarez*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 68-75, July 2026.

Physical and sensory qualities of noodles with varying levels of breadfruit flour

Johny P. Alvarez*, Joemel Estabillo, Macluven T. Gonzales, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 47-53, July 2026.

Growth and yield performance of sweet sorghum under reduced inorganic fertilizer rates supplemented with Trichoderma-enriched vermicompost

Gerald L. Seridon*, Maurine Bayubay-Abao, Jake P. Abedes, Mauricio P. Bayubay, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 38-46, July 2026.

General characteristics of symbiotic relationships between bacteria belonging to the order rhizobiales and wild legumes

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, N. D. İmamquliyev, M. İ. Qasımova, S. M. Muradova, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 33-37, July 2026.

Pharmacokinetic, toxicological, and bioactivity profile of taurine in cardiovascular health and disease management

Aravindhan Tamililakkiya, T. Dhanalakshmi*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 24-32, July 2026.

Climate change impacts on the biogeography and population status of Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst.: Implications for sustainable conservation

Fatimata Anna Diallo*, Dominique Nikiéma, Abdoulazize Sandwidi, Boukary Ousmane Diallo, Pauline Bationo/Kando, Int. J. Biosci. 29(1), 14-23, July 2026.