Genetic variability study for yield and associated quantitative characters in mutant genotypes of Dianthus caryophyllus L.

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2011
Views (271) Download (4)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Genetic variability study for yield and associated quantitative characters in mutant genotypes of Dianthus caryophyllus L.

Rajib Roychowdhury, Jagatpati Tah
Int. J. Biosci.1( 5), 38-44, October 2011.
Certificate: IJB 2011 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the nine Dianthus genotypes, including normal and mutagen treated, to assess the magnitude of variability and to pick up the heritable component of variation present in the quantitative traits. The analysis of variance revealed highly significant (P< 0.05 or 0.01) differences for all the characters studied, indicating the presence of substantial genetic variability. The phenotypic co-efficient of variation (PCV) was higher than genotypic co-efficient of variation (GCV) for all the characters studied, this shows the influence of the environmental effect on the characters. Highest GCV and PCV were noticed for total branches per plant and lowest for total no. of flowers per plant along with plant height (cm) at 50% flowering phase and flower diameter (cm) only in PCV. Broad sense heritability ranged from 33.33 (Days to seed germination) to 95.30 (Plant height at 50% flowering phase) per cent. Total leaves and branches showed high, plant height, days to branching and seeds per inflorescence showed moderate and flower per plant showed low genetic gain. Thus, these traits may serve as an effective selection parameter during breeding programme for crop improvement.

VIEWS 1

Allard RW. 1960. Principles of plant breeding. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 89-98 pp.

Ariyo OJ. 1987. Variation and Heritability of Fifteen Characters in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.).Tropical Agriculture 25, 67 – 71.

Ashri A. 1970. A dominant mutation with variable penetrance and expressivity induced by diethyl sulfate in peanuts, Arachis hypogaea L. Mutation Res. 9, 473-480.

Burton GW. 1951. Quantitative inheritance in Pearl millet (P. glaucum). Agron. J. 43, 409-417.

Burton GW. 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. 6th Int. Grassland Congress 1, 277-83.

Din R, Qasim M, Ahmad K. 2004. Radio sensitivity of various wheat genotypes in M1 generation. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 6, 898-900.

Domingo C, Andres F, Talon M. 2007. Rice cv. Bahia mutagenized population: a new resource for rice breeding in the Mediterranean basin. Span. J. Agric. Res. 5, 341-347.

Galeta  N,  Mohammed  H,  Zelleke  H.  2005. Genetic variability and genetic advance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) germplasm. Crop Res. 30, 439-445.

Gowda MVC, Nadaf HL, Sheshagiri R. 1996. The role of mutation in intraspecific differentiation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 90, 105-113.

Ganesan K. 1994. Genetic studies in F2 and F3 of tall x dwarf rice crosses. Madras Agricultural Journal 81, 30-32.

Jabeen N, Ahmed N, Tanki MI. 1998. Genetic variability in hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Agric. Sci. Digest 18, 23-26.

Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. 1955a. Estimation of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal 47, 314-318.

Kang MS, Mille JD, Tai PYP. 1983. Genetic and phenotypic path analysis and heritability in sugarcane. Crop Sci. 23, 643-647.

Lush JL. 1940. Intra – sire correlation and regression of offspring on dams as a method of estimating heritability of characters. Proc. Amer. Soc. Animal Production 33, 293-301.

Munshi AD, Behera TK. 2000. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for some traits in chillies (Capsicum annuum L.). Vegetable Sci. 27, 39 – 41.

Nayak  AR,  Chaudhary  D,  Reddy  JN.  2002. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in scented rice. Indian Agriculturist 46, 45-47.

Panse VG. 1957. Genetics of quantitative characters in relation to Plant Breeding. Ind. J. Genet. & Plt. Breed.17, 318-328.

Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR publication, New Delhi. 2nd edition. 381 pp.

Pathania N, Singh M, Arya PS. 1988. Genetic evaluation of some economic traits in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 14 (1), 38-43.

Patil SH. 1966. Mutations induced in groundnut by X-rays. Indian J. Genet. 26A, 334-348.

Ranjan   J,   Jamadagni    BM,   Salvi   MJ.   1990. Genetic variability and correlation studies in turmeric. Indian Cocoa, Areca nut and spices Journal XIV (1), 20-22.

Rao TP, Gomathinayagam P, Soundrapandian S. 1996. Genetic variability and character association studies in semi-dry rice. Madras Agricultural Journal 83(3), 185-188.

Roychowdhury, R. 2011. Effect of chemical mutagens on Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.): A Mutation Breeding Approach. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany. 14-17 pp.

Roychowdhury R, Tah J. 2011. Mutation breeding in Dianthus caryophyllus for economic traits. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2(2), 282-286.

Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. 1985. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Pub., Ludhiana. 318 pp.