Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | August 1, 2013

| Download 2

Genetic variation for agronomic characters and drought tolerance among the recombinant inbred lines of wheat from the Norstar × Zagross cross

Mohammad Reza Farzamipour, Mohammad Moghaddam, Saeed Aharizad, Varahram Rashidi

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.3(8), 76-86, August 2013

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.8.76-86


IJB 2013 [Generate Certificate]


Interest in developing drought tolerant varieties is growing due to global warming. Identification of genetic variability for drought tolerance is a prerequisite to achieve this objective. In this study a sample of 28 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of wheat developed from the cross of Norstar and Zagross varieties, together with their parents, were evaluated for two years (2010-2012) under normal and water stress conditions using split plot design with three replications. Main plots included two irrigation treatments of 70 and 140 mm evaporation from Class A pan and sub-plots consisted of 30 genotypes. The effect of genotypes and interaction of genotypes with years and water regimes were significant for all characters. Significant genotypic effect implies the existence of genetic variation among the lines under study. Heritability estimates were high for 1000 grain weight (0.87), flag leaf area (0.84), and days to heading (0.82). Biomass, grain yield, and straw yield showed the lowest heritability values (0.42, 0.50, and 0.51, respectively). Moderate genetic advance for most of the traits suggested the feasibility of selection among the RILs under investigation. Some RILs were higher yielding than either parent at both environments. Transgressive segregation was also observed for geometric mean productivity (GMP) and stress tolerance index (STI), indicating the possibility of selecting lines that are more drought tolerant than Norstar and Zagross varieties. Cluster analysis based on yield in the normal and water stress conditions, STI, and GMP identified six promising lines that can be evaluated further for drought tolerance in more environments.


Copyright © 2013
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Genetic variation for agronomic characters and drought tolerance among the recombinant inbred lines of wheat from the Norstar × Zagross cross

Akram M. 2011. Growth and yield components of wheat under water stress at different growth stages. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 36(3), 455-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v36i3.9264

Ali IH, Shakor EF. 2012. Heritability, variability, genetic correlation and path analysis for quantitative traits in durum and bread wheat under dry farming conditions. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture 40(4), 27-39.

Allard RW. 1960. Principles of plant breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

Belay G, Tesemma T, Becker HC, Merker A. 1993. Variation and interrelationships of agronomic traits in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat landraces. Euphytica 71(3), 181-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00040407

Beltrano J, Ronco Guillermina Ronce MG, Arango MC. 2006. Soil drying and rewatering applied at three grain developmental stages affect differentially growth and grain protein deposition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 18(2), 341-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202006000200011

Benmousa M, Achouch A. 2005. Effect of water stress on yield and its components of some cereals in Algeria. Journal of Central European Agriculture 6(4), 427-434.

Bradshaw HDJR, Otto KG, Frewen BE, McKay JK, Schemske DW. 1998. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkey flower (Mimulus). Genetics 149, 367–382.

Bridges WC, Jr. 1989. Analysis of a plant breeding experiment with heterogeneous variances using mixed model equations. In: Applications of mixed models in agriculture and related disciplines. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 343. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 145–154.

Blum A. 2005. Mitigation of drought stress by crop management.

Ehdaie B. 1995. Variation in water use efficiency and its components in wheat. II. Pot and field experiments. Crop Science 35(6), 1617-1626. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003 500060017x

Ehdaie B, Waines JG. 1989. Genetic variation, heritability, and path-analysis in landraces of bread wheat from southwestern Iran. Euphytica 41(3), 183-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00021584

Fernandez GCJ. 1993. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo CG, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. 13-18 August 1992. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Publication No. 93-410, Taiwan, 257-270.

Fabrizius MA, Busch RH, Khan Kh, Huckle L. 1998. Genetic diversity and heterosis of spring wheat crosses. Crop Science 38(4), 1108–1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003 800040036x

Fischer RA, Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivar. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29(5), 897-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897

Gandhi SM, Sanghi AK, Nathawat KS, Bhatnagar  MP.  1964.  Genotypic  variability  and correlation coefficients relating to grain yield and a few other quantitative characters in Indian wheats. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 24(1), 1-8.http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/j.0019-5200

Hall AE.1993. Is dehydration tolerance relevant to genotypic differences in leaf senescence and crop adaptation to dry environments? In: Close TJ and Bray EA, eds. Plant responses to cellular dehydration during environmental stress. Current topics in plant physiology, Vol. 10. Rockville, Maryland, USA: American Society of Plant Physiologists, 1–10.

Hamam, KA. 2008. Increasing yield potential of promising bread wheat lines under drought stress. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 4(6), 842-860.

Kang MS, Gauch HG, Jr. (eds.). 1996. Genotype-by-environment interaction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Khan N, Naqvi FN. 2011. Heritability of morphological traits in bread wheat advanced lines under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3(3), 215-222.

Khanna -Chopra, R, Shukla S, Singh K, Kadam SB, Singh NK. 2012. Characterization of high yielding and drought tolerant RILs identified from wheat cross WL711 x C306 RIL mapping population using drought susceptibility index (DSI) as selection criteria. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 26(1), 25-31.

Koumber RM, El-Gammaal AA. 2012. Inheritance and gene action for yield and its attributes in three bread wheat crosses (Triticum aestivum L.). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8(2), 156-162.

Lantican MA, Pingali PL, Rajaram S. 2003. Is research on marginal lands catching up? The case of unfavorable wheat growing environments. Agricultural Economics 29(3), 353–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00171.x

Li ZK, Pinson SRM, Stansel JW, Park WD. 1995. Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for heading date and plant height in cultivated rice(Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91(2), 374-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00220902

Mastrangelo AM, De Leonardis AM, Rizza F, Badeck F, Mazzucotelli E, Virzi N, Palumbo M, Matteu L, Li Destri Nicosia O, Cattivelli L. 2008. Assessment of durum wheat biodiversity for grain yield in environments with different water supplies. From Seed to Pasta: The Durum Wheat Chain. International Durum Wheat Symposium, June 30- July 3, Bologna, Italy, P.5.1.

McDonald GK, Sutton BG, Ellison FW. 1984. The effect of sowing date, irrigation and cultivar on the growth and yield of wheat in the Namoi River Valley,  New  South  Wales.  Irrigation  Science  5(2), 123-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00272550

Moayedi AA, Boyce AN, Barakbah SS. 2010. The performance of durum and bread wheat genotypes associated with yield and yield components under different water deficit conditions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4(1), 106-113.

Moghaddam M, Ehdaei B, Waines JG. 1997. Genetic variation and interrelationships of agronomic characters in landraces of bread wheat from southeastern Iran. Euphytica 95(3), 361-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003045616631

Moghaddam M, Ehdaei B, Waines JG. 1998. Genetic variation for and interrelationships among agronomic traits in landraces of bread wheat from southwestern Iran. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 52(1), 73-81.

Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R, Abdipour M. 2011a. Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes under dryland and supplemental irrigation conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5(4), 487-493.

Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R, Shefazadeh MK, Sadeghzadeh B. 2011b. Statistical analysis of durum wheat yield under semi-warm dryland condition. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5(10), 1292-1297.

Ramirez Vallejo P, Kelly JD.1998. Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99(2), 127-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018353200015

Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M. 2004. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 161(12), 1189-1202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013

Rieseberg  LH,  Archer  MA,  Wayne  RK.1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83(4), 363-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6886170

Rieseberg LH, Ellstrand NC, Arnold M. 1993. What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 12(3), 213-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352689309701902

Roberts RAJ. 2005. Insurance of crops in developing countries. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 159, FAO, Rome.

Romesburg HC. 2004. Cluster analysis for researchers. Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press.

Rosielle AA, Hamblin J. 1981.Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment . Crop Science 21(6), 943-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002 100060033x

Sabadin PK, Malosetti M, Boer MP, Tardin FD, Santos FG, Guimaraes CT, Gomide RL, Andrade CLT, Albuquerque PEP, Caniato FF, Mollinari M, Margarido GRA, Oliveira BF, Schaffert RE, Garcia AAF, van Eeuwijk FA, Magalhaes JV. 2012. Studying the genetic basis of drought tolerance in sorghum by managed stress trials and adjustments for phonological and plant height differences. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124(8), 1389-1402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1795-9

Sanjari Pireivatlou A, Yazdansepas A. 2008. Evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under pre-and post-anthesis drought stress conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 10(2), 109-121.

Shafii B, Price WJ. 1998. Analysis of genotype-by-environment interaction using the Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction model and stability estimates. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 3(3), 335–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1400587

Trethowan  RM,  van  Ginkel  M,  Rajaram  S. 2002. Progress in breeding wheat for yield and adaptation in global drought affected environments. Crop Science 42(5), 1441–1446. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1441

Valeriu R, Georgeta D, Mihail M, Daniel S. 2012. Selection and breeding experiments at the haploid level in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 4(5), 72-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS11.089

Vega U, Frey KJ. 1980. Transgressive segregation in inter and intraspecific crosses of barley. Euphytica 29(3), 585-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00023206

Vij S, Tyagi AK. 2007. Emerging trends in the functional genomics of the abiotic stress response in crop plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal 5(3), 361– 380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00239.x

Yan W, Kang MS. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Yang DL, Zhang GH, Li XM, Xing H, Cheng HB, Ni SL, Chen XP. 2012. Genetic characteristics associated with drought tolerance of plant height and thousand-grain mass of recombinant inbred lines of wheat. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 23(6), 1569-1576 (In Chinese with English abstract).

Yue B, Xue W, Xiong L, Yu X, Luo L, Cui K, Jin D, Xing Y, Zhang Q. 2006. Genetic basis of drought resistance at reproductive stage in rice: separation of drought tolerance from drought avoidance. Genetics 172(2), 1213–1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.045062

Zhang J. 2013. Breeding for transgressive segregation in cotton: do we need molecular markers. Plant and Animal Genome XXI, Jan 12-16, San Diego, CA, USA, P0451.

Zhao CX, Guo LY, Jaleel CA, Shao HB, Yang HB. 2008. Prospectives for applying molecular and genetic methodology to improve wheat cultivars in drought environments. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331(8), 579-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2008.05.006

Zwer PK, Qualset CO. 1991. Genes for resistance to stripe rust in four spring wheat varieties. 1. Seedling responses. Euphytica 58(2), 171-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00022818


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background