Geo-spatial assessment of temporal variation of greenhouse gases emission using GIS in Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/03/2015
Views (200) Download (6)

Geo-spatial assessment of temporal variation of greenhouse gases emission using GIS in Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh

Mohammad Amzad Hosain, Md. Bodrud-Doza, Fahad Ahmed*, Md. Shawon Zoarddar, Mohammad Amir Hossain Bhuiyan
J. Bio. Env. Sci.6( 3), 183-191, March 2015.
Certificate: JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]


To assess the present scenario of GHGs (CO2 and CH4) emission and its distribution, day time emissions of CO2 and CH4 in August 2013 and 2014 in Jahanginagar University area were studied using statistical analysis and GIS interpretation. In 2013, maximum value of CO2 was 500 ppm which was found in Bishmile bio gas plant, Prantic gate and Dairy gate characterized by solid waste dumping site and high way road areas. Similarly in 2014, maximum value of CO2 was 600 ppm which was found around the high way road site area. In 2013 and 2014 maximum value of CH4 was 3500 ppm and 4000ppm respectively which was found in Bishmile situated in the Northern site of study area. These sites are characterized by solid waste dumping site and biogas plant area. The results of the geospatial calculations show that in 2013, 43.355% of total area covers 357.143 to 385.714 ppm concentration of CO2 while in 2014, 45.896% of the total area covers 385.714 to 428.571 ppm concentration of CO2. Apart this in 2013, 38.604% of total area covers 621.418 to 1042.18ppm concentration of CH4 while in 2014, 39.168 % of the total area covers 856.583 to 1434.818 ppm concentration of CH4. From the spatial and temporal analysis it can be said that concentration of CO2 and CH4 in this area in a rising trend. This study would also implicitly provide a mechanism to monitor potential sources of CO2 and CH4 as well as their adverse contribution to enhance GHGs emissions.


Altshuller AP. 1968. Atmospheric analysis by gas chromatography. Advances in Chromatography, 5, 229–262.

Borjesson G, Danielsson A, Svensson BH. 2000. Methane fluxes from a Swedish landfill determined by geostatistical treatment of static chamber measurements. Environmental Science and Technology 34 (18), 4044–4050.

Cicerone RJ. Oremland RS. 1988. Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2 (4), 299–327.

Davis JC. 1986. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. Wiley, New York.

Dlugokencky E, Masarie K, Tans P. 1998. Continuing decline in the growth rate of the atmospheric methane burden. Nature 393, 447.

Gerlach TM, Douglas MP, McGee KA, Kessler R. 2001. Soil efflux and total emission rates of magmatic CO2 at the Horseshoe Lake tree kill, Mammoth Mountain, California, (1995-1999). Chemical Geology 177, 101–116.

Graedel TE, Hawkins DT, Claxton LD. (Eds.). 1986. Atmospheric chemical compound—Sources, occurrences and bioassay. Orlando: Academic. 732.

IPCC 2001. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change (2001): The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

IPCC 2007b. IPCC Forth Assessment report, Climate Change: Synthesis Report. IPCC.

Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW. (Eds.). 1991. Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York.

Nguyen TH, Kim KH, Mab CJ, Cho SJ, Sohn JR. 2010. A dramatic shift in CO and CH4 levels at the urban location in Korea after the implementation of the Natural Gas Vehicle Supply (NGVS) program. Environmental Research, 110, 396–409.

Padhy PK, Varshney CK. 2000. Ambient methane levels in Delhi. Chemosphere – Global Change Science, 2, 185–190.

Rasmussen RA. Khalil MAK. 1984. Atmospheric methane in the recent and ancient atmospheres: concentrations, trends, and inter hemispheric gradient. Journal of Geophysical Research 89, 11599–11605.

Rowland FS, Harries NRP, Blake DR. 1990. Methane in cities. Nature, 347, 432–433.

Sahay Samraj, Ghosh Chirashree. 2012. Monitoring variation in greenhouse gases concentration in Urban Environment of Delhi. Environ Monit Assess 185, 123–142 DOI 10.1007/s10661-012-2538-8.

Shipham M, Bartlett K, Crill P., Harriss R, Blaha D. 1998. Atmospheric methane measurements in central New England: an analysis of the long term trend and the seasonal and diurnal cycles. Journal of Geophysical Research 103 (D9), 10621–10630.

Spokasa K, Graffa, Morcetb M, Aranb C. 2003. Implications of the spatial variability of landfill emission rates on geospatial analyses. Waste Management 23, 599–607.

Sookun Anand, Ravindra Boojhawon, Soonil DDV. Rughooputh, 2014. Assessing greenhouse gas and related air pollutant emissions from road traffic counts: A case study for Mauritius. Transportation Research Part D 32, 35–47.

Wade Tasha and Sommer Shelly 2001. A to Z GIS. -268p. ESRI (Environmental System Research Institute)-USA.

WMO 1998. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion, 1998. World Meteorological Organization, Washington, DC. (Report No. 44).