GIS-based approach for optimized place of environmental impact assessment of oil refineries in Iran: A case study of Tehran oil refinery
Paper Details
GIS-based approach for optimized place of environmental impact assessment of oil refineries in Iran: A case study of Tehran oil refinery
Abstract
In this research presented in each of the parameters in the model, such as land, soil, vegetation, lithology, protected areas, climate and water flow rates examined separately. The objective of the proposed model is based on data classification and analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of oil refinery, sum the development zones map, GIS data and rate of effects of oil refinery on environment. The evaluation method was Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) helped to find the possible risk points and zones for Tehran oil refinery. The Geographical Information System (GIS) were used to provide the EIA maps of Tehran oil refinery. In this research EIA oil refinery found that can use in other EIA oil refineries plan in Iran. The 512 maps were provided and all of them were overlapped on together to achieve the final EIA plan. All studies based on the field studies, laboratory experiments, put data in GIS software, make raster for each part of information and find the EIA map. This EIA oil refinery plan can use as a tool for EIA model of other parts of oil refineries in Iran. Tehran oil refinery has sensitive environment and by using this model can achieve to appropriate EIA plan for environmental protection.
Aghaie, Sh. 1986. Environmental Impact Assessment of Oil Refinery. Azad Publication.
Ahammed AKM. R, Nixon B.M, 2006. Environmental impact monitoring in the EIA process of South Australia. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26, 426– 447.
Ahmadvand M, Karami E, Zamani G.H, Vanclay F. 2009. Evaluating the use of Social Impact Assessment in the context of agricultural development projects in Iran. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29, 399– 407.
Al-Rashdan D, Al-Kloub B, Dean A, Al-Shemmeri T. 1999. Theory and Methodology Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan. European Journal of Operational Research 118, 30-45.
Alshuwaikhat HB. 2005. Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 307–317.
Annandale D, Taplin R. 2003. Is Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation A ‘Burden’ To Private Firms? Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23, 383–397.
Ardalanie E. 1989. Environmental policy in Iran. Safi Alisha Publication.
Armitage DR. 2005. Collaborative environmental assessment in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 239– 258.
Backlund A. 2009. Impact assessment in the European Commission – a system with multiple objectives. Journal of Science and Policy 12, 1077-1087.
Bahoush A. 1991. Environmental protection in oil industry. Ney Publication.
Baratto F, Diwekar UM, Manca D. 2005. Impacts assessment and tradeoffs of fuel cell based auxiliary power units Part II. Environmental and health impacts, LCA, and multi-objective optimization. Journal of Power Sources 139, 214– 222.
Bare JC, Gloria TP. 2008. Environmental impact assessment taxonomy providing comprehensive coverage of midpoints, endpoints, damages, and areas of protection. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 1021-1035.
Bass R. 1998. Evaluating Environmental Justice under the National Environmental Policy Act. Journal Of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18, 83–92.
Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M, Ciarapica FE, Giacchetta G. 2009. Development of Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance procedures for an oil refinery. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22, 244–253.
Bevilacqua M, Braglia M. 2002. Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries. Journal of Cleaner Production 10, 85–92.
Blanco Moron A, Delgado Calvo-Flores M, Martín Ramos JM, Polo Almohano MP, 2009. AIEIA: Software for fuzzy environmental impact assessment. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications 36, 9135–9149.
Boyle J. 1998. Cultural influence on implementing environmental impact assessment: insights from Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18, 95-116.
Branis M, Christopoulos S. 2005. Mandated monitoring of post-project impacts in the Czech EIA. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 227–238.
Burris RK, Canter LW. 1997. Cumulative impacts are not properly addressed in environmental assessments. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 17, 5-18.
Cai YP, Huang GH, Lin QG, Nie XH, Tan Q. 2009. An optimization-model-based interactive decision support system for regional energy management systems planning under uncertainty. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications 36, 3470–3482.
Cartalis C, Feidas H, Glezakou M, Proedrou M, Chrysoulakis N. 2000. Use of earth observation in support of environmental impact assessments: prospects and trends. Journal of Environmental Science & Policy 3, 287–294.
Cashmore M. 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24, 403–426.
Cashmore V, Bond A, Cobb D. 2008. The role and functioning of environmental assessment: Theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. Journal of Environmental Management 88, 1233–1248.
Chaytor B. 1995. The Potential of Environmental Impact Assessment Procedures to Enhance Public Participation In Trade Policy Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15, 507-515.
Chen W, Warren KA, Duan N. 1999. Incorporating cleaner production analysis into environmental impact assessment in China. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19, 457–476.
Daniel SE, Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP, Rachaniotis NP. 2004. Aggregating and evaluating the results of different Environmental Impact Assessment methods. Journal of Ecological Indicators 4, 125–138.
Elcock D, Gasper J, Moses DO, Emerson D, Arguero R. 2000. Alternative future environmental regulatory approaches for petroleum refineries. Journal of Environmental Science & Policy 3, 219– 229.
Ghizhanzadeh S. 2005. Environmental Protection in Oil Terminals. Nioc Publication. Golestan M. 1985. Environmental Protection. Vaziri Publication.
Jaafarzadeh MT. 2001. Health, safety and environment in oil refinery. Nioc Publication.
Kalabokas PD, Hatzianestis J, Bartzis JG, Papagiannakopoulos P. 2001. Atmospheric concentrations of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons around a Greek oil refinery. Journal of Atmospheric Environment 35, 2545-2555.
Khan IF, Abbasi AS. 1999. MAXCRED – a new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries. Journal of Environmental Modelling & Software 14, 11–25.
Khosravanie Sh. 2001. A Guidance to Environmental Engineering in Oil Refinery. Nioc Publication.
Lai YJ, Hwang CL. 1993. IFLP-II: A decision support system. Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems 54, 47-56.
Roshanzamir M. 1991. Environmental health in oil industry. Sepehr Publisher.
Sarfehnia, M. 1993. Environmental impact assessment. Safi Ali Shah Publisher.
Sen P, Tan JKG, Spencer D. 1999. An integrated probabilistic risk analysis decision support methodology for systems with multiple state variables. Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety 64, 73–87.
Mohammad Rezaie Narimisa, Manouchehr Rezaie Narimisa (2014), GIS-based approach for optimized place of environmental impact assessment of oil refineries in Iran: A case study of Tehran oil refinery; JBES, V4, N5, May, P195-207
https://innspub.net/gis-based-approach-for-optimized-place-of-environmental-impact-assessment-of-oil-refineries-in-iran-a-case-study-of-tehran-oil-refinery/
Copyright © 2014
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0