GIS-based approach for optimized place of environmental impact assessment of oil refineries in Iran: A case study of Tehran oil refinery

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2014
Views (682)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

GIS-based approach for optimized place of environmental impact assessment of oil refineries in Iran: A case study of Tehran oil refinery

Mohammad Rezaie Narimisa, Manouchehr Rezaie Narimisa
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(5), 195-207, May 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In this research presented in each of the parameters in the model, such as land, soil, vegetation, lithology, protected areas, climate and water flow rates examined separately. The objective of the proposed model is based on data classification and analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of oil refinery, sum the development zones map, GIS data and rate of effects of oil refinery on environment. The evaluation method was Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) helped to find the possible risk points and zones for Tehran oil refinery. The Geographical Information System (GIS) were used to provide the EIA maps of Tehran oil refinery. In this research EIA oil refinery found that can use in other EIA oil refineries plan in Iran. The 512 maps were provided and all of them were overlapped on together to achieve the final EIA plan. All studies based on the field studies, laboratory experiments, put data in GIS software, make raster for each part of information and find the EIA map. This EIA oil refinery plan can use as a tool for EIA model of other parts of oil refineries in Iran. Tehran oil refinery has sensitive environment and by using this model can achieve to appropriate EIA plan for environmental protection.

Aghaie, Sh. 1986. Environmental Impact Assessment of Oil Refinery. Azad Publication.

Ahammed AKM. R, Nixon B.M, 2006. Environmental impact monitoring in the EIA process of South Australia. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26, 426– 447.

Ahmadvand M, Karami E, Zamani G.H, Vanclay F. 2009. Evaluating the use of Social Impact Assessment in the context of agricultural development projects in Iran. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29, 399– 407.

Al-Rashdan D, Al-Kloub B, Dean A, Al-Shemmeri T. 1999. Theory and Methodology Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan. European Journal of Operational Research 118, 30-45.

Alshuwaikhat HB. 2005. Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 307–317.

Annandale D, Taplin R. 2003. Is Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation A ‘Burden’ To Private Firms? Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23, 383–397.

Ardalanie E. 1989. Environmental policy in Iran. Safi Alisha Publication.

Armitage DR. 2005. Collaborative environmental assessment in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 239– 258.

Backlund A. 2009. Impact assessment in the European Commission – a system with multiple objectives. Journal of Science and Policy 12, 1077-1087.

Bahoush A. 1991. Environmental protection in oil industry. Ney Publication.

Baratto F, Diwekar UM, Manca D. 2005. Impacts assessment and tradeoffs of fuel cell based auxiliary power units Part II. Environmental and health impacts, LCA, and multi-objective optimization. Journal of Power Sources 139, 214– 222.

Bare JC, Gloria TP. 2008. Environmental impact assessment taxonomy providing comprehensive coverage of midpoints, endpoints, damages, and areas of protection. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 1021-1035.

Bass R. 1998. Evaluating Environmental Justice under the National Environmental Policy Act. Journal Of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18, 83–92.

Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M, Ciarapica FE, Giacchetta G. 2009. Development of Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance procedures for an oil refinery. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22, 244–253.

Bevilacqua M, Braglia M. 2002. Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries. Journal of Cleaner Production 10, 85–92.

Blanco Moron A, Delgado Calvo-Flores M, Martín Ramos JM, Polo Almohano MP, 2009. AIEIA: Software for fuzzy environmental impact assessment. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications 36, 9135–9149.

Boyle J. 1998. Cultural influence on implementing environmental impact assessment: insights from Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18, 95-116.

Branis M, Christopoulos S. 2005. Mandated monitoring of post-project impacts in the Czech EIA. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 227–238.

Burris RK, Canter LW. 1997. Cumulative impacts are not properly addressed in environmental assessments. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 17, 5-18.

Cai YP, Huang GH, Lin QG, Nie XH, Tan Q. 2009. An optimization-model-based interactive decision support system for regional energy management systems planning under uncertainty. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications 36, 3470–3482.

Cartalis C, Feidas H, Glezakou M, Proedrou M, Chrysoulakis N. 2000. Use of earth observation in support of environmental impact assessments: prospects and trends. Journal of Environmental Science & Policy 3, 287–294.

Cashmore M. 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24, 403–426.

Cashmore V, Bond A, Cobb D. 2008. The role and functioning of environmental assessment: Theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. Journal of Environmental Management 88, 1233–1248.

Chaytor B. 1995. The Potential of Environmental Impact Assessment Procedures to Enhance Public Participation In Trade Policy Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15, 507-515.

Chen W, Warren KA, Duan N. 1999. Incorporating cleaner production analysis into environmental impact assessment in China. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19, 457–476.

Daniel SE, Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP, Rachaniotis NP. 2004. Aggregating and evaluating the results of different Environmental Impact Assessment methods. Journal of Ecological Indicators 4, 125–138.

Elcock D, Gasper J, Moses DO, Emerson D, Arguero R. 2000. Alternative future environmental regulatory approaches for petroleum refineries. Journal of Environmental Science & Policy 3, 219– 229.

Ghizhanzadeh S. 2005. Environmental Protection in Oil Terminals. Nioc Publication. Golestan M. 1985. Environmental Protection. Vaziri Publication.

Jaafarzadeh MT. 2001. Health, safety and environment in oil refinery. Nioc Publication.

Kalabokas PD, Hatzianestis J, Bartzis JG, Papagiannakopoulos P. 2001. Atmospheric concentrations of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons around a Greek oil refinery. Journal of Atmospheric Environment 35, 2545-2555.

Khan IF, Abbasi AS. 1999. MAXCRED – a new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries. Journal of Environmental Modelling & Software 14, 11–25.

Khosravanie Sh. 2001. A Guidance to Environmental Engineering in Oil Refinery. Nioc Publication.

Lai YJ, Hwang CL. 1993. IFLP-II: A decision support system. Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems 54, 47-56.

Roshanzamir M. 1991. Environmental health in oil industry. Sepehr Publisher.

Sarfehnia, M. 1993. Environmental impact assessment. Safi Ali Shah Publisher.

Sen P, Tan JKG, Spencer D. 1999. An integrated probabilistic risk analysis decision support methodology for systems with multiple state variables. Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety 64, 73–87.

Related Articles

Agroforestry in woody-encroached Sub-Saharan savannas: Transforming ecological challenges into sustainable opportunities

Yao Anicet Gervais Kouamé, Pabo Quévin Oula, Kouamé Fulgence Koffi, Ollo Sib, Adama Bakayoko, Karidia Traoré, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 10-22, September 2025.

Extreme rainfall variability and trends in the district of Ouedeme, municipality of Glazoue (Benin)

Koumassi Dègla Hervé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 1-9, September 2025.

Heterosis breeding, general and specific combining ability and stability studies in pearl millet: Current trends

Ram Avtar, Krishan Pal, Kavita Rani, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 117-124, August 2025.

Combining ability, heterosis and stability for yield and fibre quality traits in cotton: Breeding approaches and future prospects

Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Krishan Pal, R. P. Saharan, Ram Avtar, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 109-116, August 2025.

Bridging the COPD awareness gap in marginalized populations: Findings from a multicentre study in Khalilabad, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

Anupam Pati Tripathi, Jigyasa Pandey, Sakshi Singh, Smita Pathak, Dinesh Chaudhary, Alfiya Mashii, Farheen Fatima, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 97-108, August 2025.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.