Gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern (Case Study: Isfahan, Iran)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2014
Views (706)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern (Case Study: Isfahan, Iran)

Zahra Mokhtari, Alireza Sofyanian, Seyed Jamaleddin Kajeddin, Hamid Reza Ziaee
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(6), 322-333, June 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Urban landscape is a heterogeneous mosaic of physical and biological patches. Quantifying the landscape pattern is required to assess and monitor economical, social and ecological functions of a city. This study has been developed by the expansion of the fields such as landscape ecology. In this study a combination of gradient analysis and landscape metrics were used to quantify Isfahan city`s landscape. Therefore the land use maps of 1386 was provided in six levels of manmade, agricultural, green space, barren , road and river. Two transects were directed toward north-south and east-west crossing city center to perform the gradient analysis. Moving window method was used to assess metrics along transects and those metrics were quantified in two levels of class and landscape. In total, the highest percentage of class and patch density and the largest patch index belongs to agricultural lands in Isfahan`s landscape and the mean size of barren and pastures` patches has the highest value. In addition to the change of different uses, the change in the values of different metrics was also observed. Patch density and margin density metrics increased toward city center. In general, the results showed that the mean size of patch is higher around transect`s margins and on the contrary, patch density and margin density are higher in city center. It can be understood that the values of patch density and margin density has increased with urbanization. This study showed that in addition to the change of uses, shape and density of patched have changed and they have a different trend in two transects.

The Atlas of Isfahan City. 1997. Geography and Cartography Organization, Tehran.

Shafaghi S. 2001. Isfahan Geography, Isfahan University Publication, Isfahan.

Baker LA, Hope D, Xu Y, Edmonds J, Lauver L. 2001. Nitrogen Balance for the Central Arizona-Phoenix (CAP) Ecosystem, Ecosystems, 4, 582-602.

Gustafson EJ. 1998. Quantifying Landscape Spatial Pattern: What Is the State of theArt?, Ecosystems, 1(1), 143-15.

Herold M, Goldstein NC, Clarke KC. 2003. The Spatiotemporal Form of Urban Growth: Measurement, Analysis and Modeling, Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 286-302.

Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N. 2007, Using GIS and Moving Window Method in theUrban Land Use Spatial Pattern Analyzing, Geospatial Information Science.- 67-53.

Leitao AB, Ahern J. 2002. Applying Landscape Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Sustainable Landscape Planning, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 59, No. 2, PP. 65-93.

Lock M, Wu J. 2002. A Gradient Analysis of Urban Landscape Pattern: from the Phoenix Metropolitan Region, Arizona, USA, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 17, No. 4, PP. 327–339

McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps, Computer Software Program Produced by the Authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/f ragstats.html.

Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Jagadish KS. 2004. Urban Sprawl: Metrics, Dynamicsand Modelling Using GIS, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5, 29-39.

Turner MG. 1989. Landscape Ecology: The Effect of Pattern on Process, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,2, 171-197.

Turner MG, Gardner RH, Dale VH. 1989. Predicting The Spadeof Disturbance Across Heterogeneous Landscapes, Oikos, 55,121-129.

Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag, New York.

Turner MG, Gardner RH. 1994. Quantitative Methods In Landscape Ecology: the Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Ecology, Springer – Verlag, New York.

Wang Y, Li J, Fan Z, Wang X. 2008. GIS- based Urban Mosaic and Its Gradient Analysis, IEEE, the Second International Conference On Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE).

Weng Y. 2007. Spatial Changes of Landscape Pattern in Response to Urbanization, Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, (4)341-353.

Wu J. 2004. Effects of Changing Scale on Landscape Pattern Analysis: Scaling Relations, Landscape Ecology, 19(2), 125-138.

Zhang Q, Yifang B, Jiyuan L, Sha Q, Hu Y. 2008. Analysis of Landscape Dynamics in Shanghai Using Landscape Metrics: Effects of Spatial Resolutions, the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, partB6b.

Zhang Hui-Yuan, NI Jin-ren, 2001. Discussion on the Space Methods of the City Space Ecology Adjusts and Control, City Planning Review, Vol. 25, No. 7, PP. 15-18.

Zhang L, Shu J, Wu J, Zhen Y. 2004. A GIS-based Gradient Analysis of Urban Landscape Pattern of Shanghai Metropolitan Area, China, Landscape Urban Planning, 69 (1), 1-16.

Zhou ZZ, Cai MT, Xu YT. 1999. Land Use and Landscape Dynamics in a Rural Area, Forest Research, 12, 599-65.

Related Articles

In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Brahime Tingueri*, Souleymane Ouattara, Adjima Ouoba, Romain W. Soalla, Mahamadi Hamed Ouedraogo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 141-149, June 2026.

Impact of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) infesting oil palm

M. Malarvizhi, N. Santhana Bharathi, K. Sujatha*, A. Vijaya Anand, R. Manikandan, J. P. Antony Prabhu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 129-140, June 2026.

Typhoon risk perception and preparedness after Sendong in Bayug Island

Dinah Millendez*, Lex Rei Brendon Hilario, Jay Rey Alovera, Elizabeth Edan Albiento, Melgie Alas, Peter Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 120-128, June 2026.

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.