Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GOD method in Boulimat coastal District of Bejaia area North east Algeria

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2018
Views (779)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GOD method in Boulimat coastal District of Bejaia area North east Algeria

Khemmoudj Kaddour, Balla El Hacen, Djenadi Hlima, Djerroud Yasmina
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 13(3), 109-116, September 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study constitutes the diagnosis of groundwater assessment vulnerability of the Boulimat coastal district. It has been carried out identify the area at high risk of contamination either by sources of pollution (traffic road, wastewater, pesticides, fungicides, tourist and intrusion of saline waters, for this we used the method of GOD to draw a map of vulnerability, interpretation of this map revealed that the vulnerability represented by four classes: The index of GOD is high between which (0.5 to 0.7) represents 55% of the study area is located to the centre, generally the sources of the pollution is the intensive use of pesticides and fungicides; on the other hand the east side, the west side and the south side the GOD index is average between (0.3 to 0.5) which represents about 20% of the study area. In the coastal zone the index is ranged between (0.7 to1) which represent about 10%. The low vulnerability characterized by the GOD index is ranged between (0.1 to 0.3) which represent 15% localized in south study area. This study is a valuable tool for local authorities for managing groundwater resources, monitoring these problems closely and the act accordingly.

Aller L, Bennet T, Lehre JH, Petty RJ. 1987. DRASTIC : A Standardized system for Evaluating Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Setting. US EPA. Robert S Kerr environmental Research Laboratory. Ada . OK. EPA/600/2-85/0108 pp. 163.

Bekesi G, Mc Conchie J. 2002. The use of aquifer-media characteristics Manawatu region, New Zealand. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 322-331.

Boulabeiz M, Houha B, Bousnoubra H, Agaguenia S. 2017. AGIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in the coastal plain of Collo, Northeastern Algeria, Journal of biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), Vol. 10 , N, 4 p. 81-89, 2017.

Civita M. 1994. Le carte della vulnerability a degli acquiferi all inquinamiento teoria e pratica (Contamination vulnerabilty mapping of the aquifer theory and pratic) Quaderni di techich di Protezione Ambiental, Pitagora, Italy.

Daly D, Dassargues A, Drew D, Dunne S, Goldscheider N, Neale S, Popescu I, Zwahlen F. 2002. Main concepts of the “European approach” to karst-groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 340-345?

Dixon B, Scott HD, Dixon JC, Steele KF. 2002. Prediction of aquifer vulnerability to pesticides using fuzzy rule-based models at the regional scale. Phys. Geogr 23, 130-153.

Foster S. 1987. Fundamental concept in aquifer vulnerability pollution risk and protection strategy. Proc. Intl. Conf. Vulnerability of soil and groundwater pollution. The Netherland. April.

Gemitzi A, Petalas C, Tsihrintzis VA, Pisinaras V. 2006. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques. Environ. Geol 49(3), 653-673.

Gogu RC, Dassargues A. 2000. Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index method. Environmental Geology 39(6), 549-559.

Gogu RC, Hallet V, Dassargues A. 2003. Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques. Application to the Néblon River basin (Belgium). Environ. Geol 44, 881-892.

Gouadia L, Boudoukha A, Djabri L, Guefaifia O. 2011. Evaluation de la vulnerability d une nappe en milieu semi aride et comparaison des methodes appliquees: cas de la nappe de meskiana (Est Algerian) Secheresse, N 22 pp. 35-42.

Kalantari N, Faryabi M, RahimiM H. 2008. Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability with AVI Method and GOD and DRASTIC model by GIS. Journal of Engineering Geology. 2(2), 431-445.

Khemmoudj K, Bendadouche H, Merabet S. 2014. Assessment of the vulnerability of an aquifer by DRASTIC and SYNTACS methods: Aquifer of Bazer-Guelt Zerga (Northeast Algeria) E3 journal of environmental research and Management N 5/9 pp. 169-179.

Khodai K, Shahsavari A, Etebari A. 2006. Join Plain Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Using GOD and DRASTIC Models. Journal of Iran Geology 4, 73-87.

Saadali R, Kherici N. 2018. Groundwater pollution and sustainable development of the Collo plain; Northeastern Algeria, Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), vol. 12, N06 pp. 160-165.

Vrba J, Zoporozec A. 1994. Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. IAH International Contribution for Hydrogeology, vol. 16, Hannover: Heise.

Wang L, Yang YS. 2008. An approach for catchment-scale groundwater nitrate risk assessment from diffuse agricultural sources: a case study in the Upper Bann, Northern Ireland. Hydrol. Processes 22, 4274-4286.

Yang YS, Wang L. 2010. A Review of Modelling Tools for Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Handling Diffuse Water Pollution. Water Resource Management.

Related Articles

Heterosis breeding, general and specific combining ability and stability studies in pearl millet: Current trends

Ram Avtar, Krishan Pal, Kavita Rani, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 117-124, August 2025.

Combining ability, heterosis and stability for yield and fibre quality traits in cotton: Breeding approaches and future prospects

Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Krishan Pal, R. P. Saharan, Ram Avtar, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 109-116, August 2025.

Bridging the COPD awareness gap in marginalized populations: Findings from a multicentre study in Khalilabad, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

Anupam Pati Tripathi, Jigyasa Pandey, Sakshi Singh, Smita Pathak, Dinesh Chaudhary, Alfiya Mashii, Farheen Fatima, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 97-108, August 2025.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.

Conservation and trade dynamics of non-timber forest products in local markets in south western Cameroon

Kato Samuel Namuene, Mojoko Fiona Mbella, Godswill Ntsomboh-Ntsefong, Eunice Waki, Hudjicarel Kiekeh, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 58-69, August 2025.

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.