home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GOD method in Boulimat coastal District of Bejaia area North east Algeria

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2018
Views (376) Download (17)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GOD method in Boulimat coastal District of Bejaia area North east Algeria

Khemmoudj Kaddour, Balla El Hacen, Djenadi Hlima, Djerroud Yasmina
J. Bio. Env. Sci.13( 3), 109-116, September 2018.
Certificate: JBES 2018 [Generate Certificate]
Key: AlgeriaBoulimat coastal DistrictGODGroundwaterVulnerability

Abstract

This study constitutes the diagnosis of groundwater assessment vulnerability of the Boulimat coastal district. It has been carried out identify the area at high risk of contamination either by sources of pollution (traffic road, wastewater, pesticides, fungicides, tourist and intrusion of saline waters, for this we used the method of GOD to draw a map of vulnerability, interpretation of this map revealed that the vulnerability represented by four classes: The index of GOD is high between which (0.5 to 0.7) represents 55% of the study area is located to the centre, generally the sources of the pollution is the intensive use of pesticides and fungicides; on the other hand the east side, the west side and the south side the GOD index is average between (0.3 to 0.5) which represents about 20% of the study area. In the coastal zone the index is ranged between (0.7 to1) which represent about 10%. The low vulnerability characterized by the GOD index is ranged between (0.1 to 0.3) which represent 15% localized in south study area. This study is a valuable tool for local authorities for managing groundwater resources, monitoring these problems closely and the act accordingly.

VIEWS 7
Cover PDF

Aller L, Bennet T, Lehre JH, Petty RJ. 1987. DRASTIC : A Standardized system for Evaluating Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Setting. US EPA. Robert S Kerr environmental Research Laboratory. Ada . OK. EPA/600/2-85/0108 pp. 163.

Bekesi G, Mc Conchie J. 2002. The use of aquifer-media characteristics Manawatu region, New Zealand. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 322-331.

Boulabeiz M, Houha B, Bousnoubra H, Agaguenia S. 2017. AGIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in the coastal plain of Collo, Northeastern Algeria, Journal of biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), Vol. 10 , N, 4 p. 81-89, 2017.

Civita M. 1994. Le carte della vulnerability a degli acquiferi all inquinamiento teoria e pratica (Contamination vulnerabilty mapping of the aquifer theory and pratic) Quaderni di techich di Protezione Ambiental, Pitagora, Italy.

Daly D, Dassargues A, Drew D, Dunne S, Goldscheider N, Neale S, Popescu I, Zwahlen F. 2002. Main concepts of the “European approach” to karst-groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 340-345?

Dixon B, Scott HD, Dixon JC, Steele KF. 2002. Prediction of aquifer vulnerability to pesticides using fuzzy rule-based models at the regional scale. Phys. Geogr 23, 130-153.

Foster S. 1987. Fundamental concept in aquifer vulnerability pollution risk and protection strategy. Proc. Intl. Conf. Vulnerability of soil and groundwater pollution. The Netherland. April.

Gemitzi A, Petalas C, Tsihrintzis VA, Pisinaras V. 2006. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques. Environ. Geol 49(3), 653-673.

Gogu RC, Dassargues A. 2000. Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index method. Environmental Geology 39(6), 549-559.

Gogu RC, Hallet V, Dassargues A. 2003. Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques. Application to the Néblon River basin (Belgium). Environ. Geol 44, 881-892.

Gouadia L, Boudoukha A, Djabri L, Guefaifia O. 2011. Evaluation de la vulnerability d une nappe en milieu semi aride et comparaison des methodes appliquees: cas de la nappe de meskiana (Est Algerian) Secheresse, N 22 pp. 35-42.

Kalantari N, Faryabi M, RahimiM H. 2008. Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability with AVI Method and GOD and DRASTIC model by GIS. Journal of Engineering Geology. 2(2), 431-445.

Khemmoudj K, Bendadouche H, Merabet S. 2014. Assessment of the vulnerability of an aquifer by DRASTIC and SYNTACS methods: Aquifer of Bazer-Guelt Zerga (Northeast Algeria) E3 journal of environmental research and Management N 5/9 pp. 169-179.

Khodai K, Shahsavari A, Etebari A. 2006. Join Plain Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Using GOD and DRASTIC Models. Journal of Iran Geology 4, 73-87.

Saadali R, Kherici N. 2018. Groundwater pollution and sustainable development of the Collo plain; Northeastern Algeria, Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), vol. 12, N06 pp. 160-165.

Vrba J, Zoporozec A. 1994. Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. IAH International Contribution for Hydrogeology, vol. 16, Hannover: Heise.

Wang L, Yang YS. 2008. An approach for catchment-scale groundwater nitrate risk assessment from diffuse agricultural sources: a case study in the Upper Bann, Northern Ireland. Hydrol. Processes 22, 4274-4286.

Yang YS, Wang L. 2010. A Review of Modelling Tools for Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Handling Diffuse Water Pollution. Water Resource Management.

Submit Manuscript