Growth and yield response of cotton varieties under different methods of fertilizer application

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2016
Views (232) Download (28)

Growth and yield response of cotton varieties under different methods of fertilizer application

Sikandar Ali Jamro, Ahmad Naqi Shah, Muhammad Irfan Ahmad, G. M. Jamro, Aaqil Khan, Waheed Ahmed Siddiqui, Alam Sher, Ghulam Ali Bugti
J. Bio. Env. Sci.9( 4), 198-206, October 2016.
Certificate: JBES 2016 [Generate Certificate]


The cotton crop field experiment was conducted during khraif season 2012 in Soil Chemistry Section, at Agriculture Research Institute, Tandojam Sindh Pakistan. Objective of this study to evaluate the two cotton varieties (CRIS-234 and NIAB-78) were checked for the best performance against two fertilizer application methods (broadcasting method and strip method) in a three replicated randomized complete block design having net plot size of 424m2. It was noted that all the growth and yield contributing characters of cotton crop were significantly (P<0.05) affected without the exception of monopodial branches plant-1which showed non-significant (P>0.05) response to different fertilizer application methods but significant results shows (P<0.05) to varieties. It was concluded that that strip method of fertilizer application is most effective where the cotton plants utilized nutrients more efficiently and resulted higher seed cotton yields as compared to broadcasting method; whereas, cultivar NIAB-78 proved its superiority in terms of seed cotton yield and lint quality traits over its companion variety CRIS-234. It is suggested that for maximization of seed cotton yield and lint quality, the crop may be fertilized through strip fertilizer application method; and variety NIAB-78 may preferably be adopted over CRIS-234. The data thus collected were subjected to statistical analysis using Analysis of variance technique and LSD (Least Significant Test) to determine the superiority of treatment means using Mstat-C Computer Statistical Software, following Gomez and Gomez (1984).


Don Eckert DR. 2010. Efficient Fertilizer Use of Nitrogen Pp. 1-19.

Dorothy M. Stolton S. 1999. Organic cotton: From field to final product pp. 1-21.

Ebelhar MW, Welch RA. 1996. Cotton response to multiple split applications of nitrogen. p. 1345–1348. In P. Dugger and D. Richter (Ed.) 1996 Proc. Belt wide Cotton Conf. Nashville, TN. 9-12 Jan. 1996. Nat. Cotton Counc. Am. Memphis TN.

Gomes AK, Gomez AA. 1984. Statiscial procedures for agricultural research (2nd Edition). John Wiley and Sones. New yark.

Go P. 2015. Agricultural statistics of Pakistan 2014-2015. Government of Pakistan, Minstry of food, Agriculture and livestock, economic wing, Islamabad Pkistan.

Imran M, Shakeel A, Farooq J, Saeed A, Faroo A, Riaz M. 2011. Gentetic studies of fiber quality parameter and earlines related traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirstum L.). AAB Bioflex 3(3), 151-159.

Milford GFJ, Armstrong MJ, Jarvis PJ, Houghton BJ, Bellett-Travers DM, Jones J, Leigh RA. 2000. Effects of potassium fertilizer on the yield, quality and potassium of ftake of sugar beet crops grown on soils of different potassium status. Journal of Agricultural Science 135, 1-10.

Moore SH. 1998. Optimum soil-applied nitrogen levels on a high pH alluvial soil. J. Plant Nutr 21(6), 1139-1144.

Nour A. 2015. Review nitrogen utilization features in cotton crop. 10.4236/ajps.67105 987-1002.

Sawan ZM, Mahmoud H. El-Guibali AH. 2006. Response of yield, yield components and fibre properties of Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) to Nitrogen fertilization and foliar applied potassium and mepiquat chloride. J. Cotton Sci 10, 224-234.

Setatou HB, Simonis AD. 1996. Effect of time and rate of nitrogen application on cotton. Fertilizer Res 43, 49-53.