Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | November 1, 2019

| Download

Growth and yield traits of maize hybrid genotypes as influenced by different priming techniques

Rashid Jalal, Junaid Ahmad, Muhammad Aman Khan, Bibi Safia, Yasmeen Rehmat, Hummaira, Abidullah, Abbas Saleem, Abdul Aziz, Sultan Nawaz, Manzoor Ahmad

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.15(5), 163-172, November 2019

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/15.5.163-172


IJB 2019 [Generate Certificate]


A field study was conducted at university of agriculture Peshawar-Pakistan with the purpose of to investigate the influence on different seed priming techniques on different maize hybrid genotypes. The experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) replicated four times. Two factors experiment was performed i.e. sources of priming (Control, hydro, solid matrix priming, osmo-priming with PEG-6000) and maize hybrids (Gorilla, Pioneer 3025, CS-220). All priming techniques was done for 24 hours. Results of the experiment shows taller plants (227 cm), leaf area plant-1 (3179 cm-2), maximum ear length (19.2 cm), grains ear-1 (556.2 grains), thousand grain weight (331 g), biological yield (150778  kg ha-1), grain yield (5098 kg ha-1) and harvest index (33.9%) was recorded with osmo-priming (PEG-6000). In folder of maize hybrids more leaf area plant-1 (3131 cm-2) maximum ear length (19 cm), grains ear-1 (532.2 grains), thousand grain weight (327.8 g), biological yield (15065 kg ha-1) and grain yield (4564  kg ha-1) was recorded with CS-220. From the experimental results, it is concluded that CS-220 with osmo-priming (PEG-6000) is recommended for cultivation under the agro-ecological conditions of Peshawar Pakistan.


Copyright © 2019
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Growth and yield traits of maize hybrid genotypes as influenced by different priming techniques

Akhter SA, Mahar AR, Mirbahar AA. 2009. Improving yield performance of landrace wheat under salinity stress using on-farm seed priming. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41(5) 2209-2216.

Andoh H, Kobata T. 2002. Effect of seed hardening on the seedling emergence and alpha-amylase activity in the grains of wheat and rice sown in dry soil of Japan. Journal of Crop Science 71, 220-225.

Basra S, Farooq M, Khaliq A. 2003. Comparative study of pre–sowing seed enhancement treatments in indica rice (Oryza sativa L) Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Science 1, p 5–9.

Guan Y, Hu J, Wang X, Shao C. 2009. Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress. Journal of Zheijian University 10(6), p 427-433.

Harris D, Rashid A, Miraj G, Arif M, Shah H. 2007. On-farm seed priming with zinc sulphate solution, a cost effective way to increase the maize yields of resource poor farmers. Field Crop Research. 110, 119-27.

Harris D, Pathan AK, Gothkar P, Joshi A, Chivasa W, Nyamudeza P. 2001. On-farm seed priming: using participatory methods to revive and refine a key technology. Agricultural systems 69(1), 151-164.

Jamal Y, Shafi M, Bakht J, Arif M. 2011. Seed priming improves salinity tolerance of wheat varieties. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43(6), 2683-2686.

Khaliq T, Mahmood T, Masood A. 2004. Effectiveness of farmyard manure, poultry manure and nitrogen for corn productivity. International Journalof Agriculture and Biology 2, 260-263.

Khush GS. 2008. Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice. Journal of Plant Molecular Biology. 35, 25-34.

Kilic H, Yağbasanlar T. 2010. The effect of drought stress on grain yield, yield components and some quality traits of durum wheat (Triticumturgidumssp. durum) cultivars. Notry Botany Horticulture Agrobotan 38(1), 164-170.

Kouio AG. 2003. Chemical and biological changes in seed treatment of rice varietis.Journal of rice Science. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, p 207-215.

Kurdikeri MB, Aswathaiah B, Mahadevappa M, Prasanna KPR, Prasad SR. 1995. Effect of seed invigoration on field performance of maize. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29, p 208‒212.

Liu X, Huang B. 2002.Cytokinin effects on creeping bent grass response to heat stress leaf senescence and antioxidant metabolism. Crop Science 42, 466‒472.

MNFSR. 2016. Agriculture Statistic of Pakistan. 2016. Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Economic Survey of Pakistan.

Murungu FS, Madanzi T. 2010. Seed priming, genotype and sowing date effects on emergence, growth and yield of wheat in a tropical low altitude area of Zimbabwe. African Journalof Agriculture and Forestry 78(3), 172-175.

Rehman H, Basra SMA, Farooq M. 2011. Field appraisal of seed priming to improve the growth, yield and quality of direct seeded rice. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 3, p 994‒1004.

Rehman H, Nawaz MQ, Basra SMA, Afzal I, Yasmeen A, Hassan FU. 2014. Seed priming influence on early crop growth, phenological development and yield performance of linola.Journal of Integration Agriculture 13, 990‒996.

Rouhi HR, Aboutalebian MA. Zadeh SF. 2011. Effects of hydro and osmo priming on drought stress tolerance during germination in four grass species. International journal of Agricultural Science 1(2), 107-114.

Sallam HA. 1999. Effect of some seed soaking treatments on growth and chemical components on faba bean plants under saline conditions. Annual Agricultural Science 44, 159‒171.

Subedi KD, Ma BL. 2005. Seed priming does not improve corn Yield in a humid temperate environment. Agronomy Journal 97, 211-218.

Steel RGD, Terrie JH. 1996. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background