Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2013
Views (746)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis towards different agro-climatic conditions

Tika Khan, Shamsher Ali, Imtiaz Ahmed Khan, Jan Alam
Int. J. Biosci. 3(9), 293-297, September 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Seabuckthorn is an important medicinal plant. Present study investigates growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. sinensis cuttings towards different agro-climatic conditions. Experiment was designed according to the Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. Cuttings were treated with 50 ppm NAN solution for 24 hours and growth pattern was monitored closely for 12 months regularly. Results showed significant effect of different climatic conditions and planting periods on sprouting (70.74%-93.16%), plant height (21.10 cm-27.75 cm), number of branches (4.40 – 7.12 per plant), number of roots (2.00 – 3.12 per plant), roots length (7.22 – 10.90 cm), root weight (1.00 – 1.96 g), survival percentage (68.78% – 90.59%) and overall health indicator (25.22 – 33.39). Selection of appropriate species with best suited planting period and established treatment will benefit Seabuckthorn growers for better yield, increased productivity and reasonable cash returns.

Akkermans ADL, Roelofsen W, Blom J, Hussdanell K, Harkink R. 1983. Utilization of carbon and nitrogen compounds of Frankia in synthetic media and in root nodules of Alnus glutinosa, Hippophae rhamnoides and Datisca cannabina. Canadian Journal of Botany 61(11), 2793-2800 Retrieved from. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/b 83-309 on September 8, 2013.

Bailey LH, Bailey EZ. 1978. Hortus third, A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. McMillan Publ. Co., New York. 337.

Baloch A. 1993. Horticulture.phases of plant growth, National Book Foundation, Isamabad. 63 p.

Bernath J, Foldesi D. 1992. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): a promising new medicinal and food crop. Journal ofHerbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 1, 27–35. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J044 v01n01_04#.UjLx5DaD-So on September 13, 2013

Gurevick SK. 1956. The application of sea buckthorn oil on ophthalmology. Vesttin. Ohamologu 2, 30–33.

Heinze M, Fiedler HJ. 1981. Experimental planting of potash waste dumps. I. Communication: Pot experiments with trees and shrubs under various water and nutrient conditions. Archiv Acker Pflanzen. Bodenkunde 25, 315–322.

Hue Shuhua et al. 1989. Studies on the techniques for Seabuckthorn Hardwood Cutting Culture” In: Proceedings of the International symposium on Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides). 217-227 p, Xian, China.

Li TSC, McLoughlin C. 1997. Sea buckthorn production guide. Canada Sea Buckthorn Enterprises Ltd. Peachland, British Columbia.

Li TSC, Schroeder WR. 1996. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A multipurpose plant. Horticultural Technology 6, 370–380.

Li TSC, Wang LCH. 1998. Physiological components and health effects of ginseng, echinacea and sea buckthorn. In: G. Mazza (ed.), Functional foods, biochemical & processing aspects. Technomic Publications & Co. Inc., Lancaster, PA.

Lu R. 1992. Sea buckthorn: A multipurpose plant species for fragile mountains. International. Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Katmandu, Nepal.

Rousi A. 1971. The genus Hippophae L. A taxonomic study. Annales Botanici Fennici 8, 177–227.

Synge PM. 1974. Dictionary of gardening: A practical and scientific encyclopedia of horticulture. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Xu M. 1994. The medical research and exploitation of sea buckthorn. Hippophae 7, 32–34.

Related Articles

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.

Valorisation of table waste and fruit waste by black soldiers (Ullicens hermetica)

Ayaba Adéline Hounnou, Vanessa Chabi, Jomini Marc Sène Alitonou, Franck Sokenou, Mickael Vitus Martin Kpessou Saïzonou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo, Guy Alain Alitonou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 123-128, April 2026.

Murraya koenigii (Linn.) Spreng.: An opulent source of fatty acid

Shahin Aziz*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 116-122, April 2026.

Design and architecture of an IoT-enabled bamboo resource management system: Data-driven approach for sustainable agriculture

Charlot L. Maramag*, Dorothy M. Ayuyang, Richard R. Ayuyang, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 107-115, April 2026.

Physicochemical and microbiological characterization of flours from the local variety of purple corn (Zea mays L.) produced and marketed in Katiola (Côte d’Ivoire)

Moumouny Traore*, N´Zebo Desiré Kouame, Pepiesin Marie Ange Melem Soro, Zamblé Bi Irié Abel Boli, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 98-106, April 2026.

In the shadows of governance: Exploring youth participation in local peacebuilding initiatives

Juramie R. Rubia, Benny R. Rubia, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 85-97, April 2026.

Evaluation of the agronomic performance, beta-carotene content and dry matter content of 228 sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) genotypes in Burkina Faso

Nattan Gamsore*, Koussao Some, Djakaridja Tiama, Pauline Bationo_Kando, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 73-84, April 2026.

Geomatics tools for agricultural and farm disaster risk management and reduction: A survey of farmers in South-South coastal communities, Nigeria

G. O. Nwodo, O. J. Ugwu, E. U. Onah, A. Ugwuoti, E. Elijah Ebinne*, O. P. Nogheghase, S. I. Ogbaa, U. E. Ahuchaogu, T. O. Ogbuji, C. P. Owuamalam-Chidi, C. O. Osuagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, O. E. Mbakaogu, J. U. Chikaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 59-72, April 2026.