Host range and distribution pattern of Dacus punctatifrons and Helicoverpa armigera : two fruigivorous pests; elucidation of interspecific competition in tomato’s agro-system
Paper Details
Host range and distribution pattern of Dacus punctatifrons and Helicoverpa armigera : two fruigivorous pests; elucidation of interspecific competition in tomato’s agro-system
Abstract
With the aims to use the integrated pest management approach to control Dacus punctatifrons and Helicoverpa armigera two pests of tomato, knowledge on their ecological requirements is crucial. Three years survey was done in tomato gardens, orchard, farm and virgin lands to record infested fruits. Collection sites were noted, potential infested fruits were incubated and the emerged insects identified. The number of infested fruits caused by each of the pest species was recorded monthly. The variance-to-mean ratio (VMR) where used to determine the distribution model of pests in control gardens. Of 40 plant species examined, 5 species belong to 2 families that hosted D. punctatifrons maggots while 23 species belong to 11 families that hosted H. armigera caterpillars and 9 species were exempted of pest attacks. The pests were continuously distributed in the 14 explored localities of the 4 regions of Cameroon. A VMR factor showed that, larvae populations presented a clumped distribution on their hosts (D This can be the fact that female laid their eggs on bunched fruits. The pest’s impact significantly varied with plant varieties, exotic tomato was more susceptible to the pests than the local variety. As result of competition, the pests’ populations responded to their patchy distribution by separating their periods of resource exploitation. This separation can also be the fact of climate, because the overlapping of populations’ larvae were synchronized with change in seasons and was observed at the same period over the years.
Balagawi S, Vijaysegaran S, Drew AIR. 2005. Influence of fruit traits on oviposition preference and offspring performance of Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on three tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) cultivars. Australian Journal of Entomology 44, 97– 103.
Barbault R. 1997. Écologie générale : structure et fonctionnement de la biosphère 4th éd. Masson, Paris, France, p 286.
Borror DJ, De Long Dwight M, Triplehorn CA. 1976. An Introduction to the study of insects. 4th edition. Holt, Rinchart and Wilnston, New York, 851p.
Brown JH. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist 130, 255-79.
Bruno JF, Fridley JD, Bromberg KD, Bertness MD. 2005. Insights into biotic interactions from studies of species invasions. In: SaxDF, GainesSD, StachowiczJJ, eds. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer, 13–40.
Delvare G, Aberlenc HP. 1989. Les insectes d’Afrique et d’Amérique tropicales. Clés pour la reconnaissance des familles. Prifas, Montpellier, France, p 302.
De Meyer M. 2001. Distribution patterns and host-plant relationships within the genus Ceratitis MacLeay (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Africa. Cimbebasia 17, 219-228.
Djiéto-Lordon C, Aléné DC. 2006. Inventaire diagnostique des insectes de quelques cultures dans les exploitations maraîchères périurbaines dans la région de Yaoundé-Cameroun. In Bella Manga F., Harvard M. (eds) «PCP-Grand Sud Cameroun. Actes atelier de présentation des résultats de recherche participative». 21-23 février 2006, Yaoundé, p 7-17.
Drew RAI. 2004. Biogeography and Speciation in the Dacini (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae). Bishop Museum Bulletin in Entomology 12, 165-178.
Duyck P-F, David P, Quilici S. 2004. A review of relationships between interspecific competition and invasion in fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ecological Entomology 29, 511-520.
Duyck PF, David P, Pavoine S, Quilici S. 2008. Can host-range allow niche differentiation of invasive polyphagous fruit flies (Diptera: Tephridtidae) in la reunión. Ecological Entomology 10(1111), 1365-2311.
Elono Azang PS, Aléné CD, Heumou CR, Ngassam P, Djiéto-Lordon C. 2016. Diversity Abundance and incidence of fruits pests insect on tree Solanum Varieties zone (Solanaceae) in two agro-ecological regions of Southern Cameroon. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11(39), 3788-3798.
Erbout N. 2010. Host plant toxicity, stenophagy and evolutionary radiation in phytophagous insects: genus Ceratitis (Diptera: Tephritidae) as ecological model. Thèse de Doctorat/PhD. Université de Gent, p 177.
Futuyma DJ. 2005. Evolution. SINAUER ASSOCIATED, INC. Publishers. Stunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A., p 603.
Nonveiller Guido. 1984. Catalogue commenté et illustré des insectes du Cameroun d’intérêt agricole (apparitions, répartition, importance), (Fond de solidarité avec les pays en voie de développement et du Gouvernement de la république Socialiste Fédérative de Yougoslavie), p 210.
Grubben GJH, Denton OA. 2004. Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale 2. Légumes. Fondation PROTA, Wageningen, p 737.
Heumou CR, Djiéto-Lordon C, Aléné CD, Elono Azang PS. 2015. Diversity and agronomic status of tomato and pepper fruits pests in two agro-ecological zone of Southern Cameroun: Western Highland and Southern Plateau of Cameroon. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10(11), 1224-1232.
Manuel C, Molles J. 2008. Ecology: Concepts Applications. 4th ed. The McGraw-Hill companies, New Mexico, p 604.
Mehta KS, Patyal SK, Rana RS, Sharma KC. 2010. Ecofriendly techniques for the management of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in tomato. Journal of Biopesticides 3, 296-303.
Miller SA, John PH. 2007. Zoology: Seventh Edition. McGraw-Hill, NewsYork. P 588.
Moral Garcıa´ FJ. 2006. Analysis of the Spatio–temporal Distribution of Helicoverpa armigera Hb. in a Tomato Field using a Stochastic Approach. Biosystems Engineering: 93(3), 253–259.
Navarajan PAV. 2007. Insect pests and their management. Indian Agricultural Research Institute Indian, New Dehli, p 68.
Ngamo Tinkeu L, Ladang D, Vayssieres JF, Lyannaz JP. 2010. Diversité des espèces de mouche des fruits (Diptera :Tephritidae) dans un verger mixte dans la localité de Malang (Ngaoundéré, Cameroun). International Journal Biological Chemistry Sciences 4(5), 1425-1434.
Ntonifor NN, Okolle JN. 2006. Bioecology of the fruit fly Dacus punctatifrons on tomato and Host range expansion. Journal Tropical Agriculture and Food Sciences 34(2), 417-425.
Novotny V, Basset Y. 2005. Host specificity of insect herbivores in tropical forests. Proceedings of Royal Society 272, 1083-1090.
Russell JP, Wolfe LS, Hertz, Starr. 2008. Biology: The Dynamic Science, Firt Edition. Thomson Higher Education, Belmont, USA. 1289.
Tindo M, Tamo M. 1999. La mouche des fruits Dacus punctatifrons (Diptera : Tephritidae) comme problème de production de la tomate dans la région de la Lékié (Sud-Cameroun). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 35, 525-527.
Trowell SC, Forrester NW, Garsia KA, Lang GA, Bird LJ, Hill AS, Skerritt JH, Daly JC. 2000. Rapid antibody-based field test to distinguish between Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Helicoverpa punctigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 93(3), 878-891.
Silvie P, Delvard G, Maldes JM. 1989. Arthropodes associes à la culture cotonnière au Tchad : ravageurs, prédateurs et parasites. Coton Fibre Tropical. XLIV fasc. 4-275.
Silvie P, Delvard G, Aberlenc H-p, Songnigbe B. 1993. Contribution à l’inventaire faunistique du cotonnier au Togo dans une optique de lutte intégrée. Coton Fibre Tropical. 44, 1-16.
Vayssières JF, Wharton R, Delvare G, Fatogoma F. 2002. Diversity and pest control potential of Hymenopterans Parasitoids of Ceratitis spp. on mango in Mali. Proceedings of 6th international fruit fly symposium 6-10 May 2002, Stellenbosch, South Africa, p461-464.
Westphal E, Embrechts J, Mbouemboue P, Mouzong Boyomo, Westphal-Stevels JMC. 1981. Agriculture autochtone au Cameroun. Veenman & Zonen B. V. Wageningen, Pays-Bas, p 175.
White Ian M, Elson-Harris Marlene M. 1994. Fruit flies of economic significance: Their identification and Bionomics. CAB International in association with ACIAR (The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research), 601 p.
Virgilio M, De Meyer M, White IM, Backeljau T. 2009. African Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae: Molecular data and host plant associations do not corroborate morphology based classifications. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51, 531–539.
Cyril Roméo Heumou, Pierre Stephan Elono Azang, Chantal Désire Aléné, Pierre Ngassam, Champlain Djiéto-Lordon (2019), Host range and distribution pattern of Dacus punctatifrons and Helicoverpa armigera : two fruigivorous pests; elucidation of interspecific competition in tomato’s agro-system; IJB, V14, N3, March, P16-29
https://innspub.net/host-range-and-distribution-pattern-of-dacus-punctatifrons-and-helicoverpa-armigera-two-fruigivorous-pests-elucidation-of-interspecific-competition-in-tomatos-agro-system/
Copyright © 2019
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0