If a university is a planet, does it have enough resources for its inhabitants? The case of the ecological footprint and biocapacity of Central Mindanao University

Paper Details

Research Paper 03/09/2022
Views (486) Download (52)

If a university is a planet, does it have enough resources for its inhabitants? The case of the ecological footprint and biocapacity of Central Mindanao University

Michael Arieh P. Medina
J. Bio. Env. Sci.21( 3), 11-17, September 2022.
Certificate: JBES 2022 [Generate Certificate]


This study was done to determine the ability of the landholdings of Central Mindanao University in providing for the needs of its populace (students, faculty, and staff). Biocapacity was used to measure how much land is available for the demand of the CMU populace to provide for its needs. Using land area data of the different land uses in CMU as well as calculation values from the Global Footprint Network, the biocapacity of CMU was computed. It was found out that CMU’s biocapacity is equivalent to 6,928.61 ghas which can be used to allocate 0.693 ghas for every member of the CMU populace. Based on ecological footprint calculation of the CMU populace from previous studies, it is revealed that although CMU lands won’t be enough for the lifestyle of the whole populace, it can be able to sustain its food requirements from agricultural crops. Furthermore, changes in some aspects of the ecological footprint of the populace (reduced consumption of animal based food, lessened dependence on wood, cutting down carbon footprint, etc.) and conversion of some crop lands and grazing lands into forest lands can lead to the sustainability of CMU in terms of independently and continuously providing for the resource needs of its inhabitants.


Barrett J, Scott A. 2001. The ecological footprint: a metric for corporate sustainability. Corporate environmental strategy 8(4), 316-325.

Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales J, Wackernagel M, Galli A. 2013 Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecological indicators 24(1), 518-533.

Conway T, Dalton C, Loo J, Benakoun L. 2008. Developing ecological footprint scenarios on university campuses: a case study of the University of Toronto at Mississauga. International journal of sustainability in higher education 9(1), 4-20.

Coto-Millan P, Mantecon I, Quesada J. 2008 Corporate Ecological Footprint: new conversion factors. Research letters in ecology 2008 1-4.

Flint K. 2001. Institutional ecological footprint analysis-A case study of the University of Newcastle, Australia. International journal of sustainability in higher education 2(1), 48-62.

Global Footprint Network. 2013. Restoring balance in Laguna Lake Region: 2013 Ecological Footprint Report. RP and GFN.

Holland L. 2003. Can the principle of the ecological footprint be applied to measure the environmental sustainability of business?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(4), 224-232.

Huijbregts M, Hellweg S, Frischknecht R, Hungerbühler K, Hendriks A. 2008. Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products. Ecological economics 64(4), 798-807.

Kitzes J, Peller A, Goldfinger S, Wackernagel M. 2007. Current methods for calculating national ecological footprint accounts, Science for environment and sustainable society 4(1), 1-9.

Lambrechts W, Van Liedekerke L. 2014. Using ecological footprint analysis in higher education: Campus operations, policy development and educational purposes. Ecological indicators 45(1), 402-406.

Limnios E, Ghadouani A, Schilizzi S, Mazzarol T. 2009. Giving the consumer the choice: A methodology for Product Ecological Footprint calculation. Ecological economics 68(10), 2525-2534.

Medina MAP, Belcena KP. 2018. Measuring a University’s Environmental Impact through its Carbon Emissions. World news of natural sciences 20(1), 78-84.

Medina MAP, Catalon BG. 2015. Reducing our ecological footprint: developing sustainability scenarios for the College of Forestry and Environmental Science, Central Mindanao University, Philippines. Bulletin of environment, pharmacology and life sciences 4(8), 1-6.

Medina MAP, Toledo-Bruno AG. 2016. Ecological footprint of university students: Does gender matter?. Global journal of environmental science and management 2(4), 339-344.

Medina MAP. 2015. The sustainability of on campus residence: a utilization of ecological footprinting in a state university in Mindanao, Philippines. Advances in environmental sciences 7(1), 1-10.

Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D. 2004. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land use policy 21(3), 231-246.

Moran D, Wackernagel M, Kitzes J, Goldfinger S, Boutaud A. 2008. Measuring sustainable development—Nation by nation. Ecological economics 64(3), 470-474.

Nunes L, Catarino A, Teixeira M, Cuesta E. 2013. Framework for the inter-comparison of ecological footprint of universities. Ecological indicators. 32(1), 276-284.

Paquit JC, Mindaña FNW. 2017. Modeling the spatial pattern of carbon stock in Central Mindanao University using inVEST tool. Journal of biodiversity and environmental sciences 10(4), 103-113.

Toledo-Bruno AG, Medina MAP, Patricio JHP. 2016. Ecological footprint of residents in a university town in Mindanao, Philippines. CMU Journal of Science 20(1), 24-34

Venetoulis J. 2004. Assessing the ecological impact of a university: the ecological footprint for the University of Redlands. International journal of sustainability in higher education 2(2), 180-197.

Wackernagel M, Kitzes J, Moran D, Goldfinger S, Thomas M. 2006. The ecological footprint of cities and regions: comparing resource availability with resource demand. Environment and urbanization 18(1), 103-112.

Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Linares A, Falfán I, Garcıa J, Guerrero A, Guerrero M. 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological economics 29(3), 375-390.

Wackernagel M, Schulz N, Deumling D, Linares A, Jenkins M, Kapos V, Monfreda C, Loh J, Myers N, Norgaard R, Randers J. 2002. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(14), 9266-9271.

Wackernagel M. 1998. The ecological footprint of Santiago de Chile. Local environment 3(1), 7-25.